Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lidocaine 5 % patches as an effective short-term co-analgesic in cancer pain. Preliminary results

  • Special Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the short-term efficacy and patients’ subjective perception of the use of lidocaine 5 % patches for painful scars (post-thoracotomy and post-mastectomy) and pain caused by chest wall tumors.

Methods

This is a prospective, descriptive, non-controlled, non-randomized, open-label study of patients seen in the palliative care outpatient clinic. Demographic data, variables relating to the severity of the pain, and concomitant therapy both at the start and end of treatment, the need for interventional anesthetic techniques (IAT), patients’ subjective perception and treatment-related side effects were all recorded.

Results

Twenty patients were included with a mean follow-up of 29.2 days. The treatment led to a statistically significant clinical improvement in pain severity. There was no clinically significant opioid dose escalation during the treatment period. Only three patients required IAT to relieve the pain. Sixty five percent of patients were very satisfied with the therapy. No systemic or local adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

The addition of lidocaine 5 % patches is effective in the short term for the treatment of neuropathic cancer pain accompanied by allodynia, whether deriving from a painful scar or chest wall tumor. These findings need to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials with larger samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garcia de Paredes ML, Moral González F, Martínez del Prado P, Martí Ciriquian JL, Enrech Francés S, Cobo Dols M et al (2011) First evidence of oncologic neuropathic pain prevalence alter screening 8615 cancer patients. Results of the On study. Ann Oncol 22:924–930

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Faisinger R, Nekolaichuk C, Lawlor P, Neumann C, Hanson J, Vigano A (2005) A multicenter study of the revised edmonton staging system for classifying cancer pain in advanced cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 29(3):224–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caraceni A, Portenoy R (1999) An international survey of cancer pain characteristics and syndromes. Pain 82:263–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vadauloca A, Raptis E et al (2012) Pharmacological treatment on neuropathic cancer pain: a comprehensive review of the current literature. Pain Pract 12(3):219–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stute P, Soukup J, Menzel M et al (2003) Analysis and treatment of different types of neuropathic cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 26:1123–1131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Muguruza I, Aranda JL, García-Yuste M (2011) Tratamiento del cáncer de pulmón con invasión de la pared torácica. Arch Bronconeumol 47:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stoeben E, Ludwig C (2009) Chest wall resection for lung cancer: indications and techniques. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 35:450–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers ML, Duffy JP (2000) Surgical aspects of chronic post-thoracotomy pain. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 18:711–716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf C (2006) Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet 367:1618–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pertunnen K, Tasmuth T, Kalso E (1999) Chronic pain after thoracic surgery: a follow up study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43:563–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Macdonald L, Bruce J, Scott NW, Smith WCS, Chambers WA (2005) Long-term follow up of breast cancer survivors with post-mastectomy pain syndrome. Br J Cancer 92:225–230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dworkin R, O’Connor A, Audette J, Baron R, Gourlay GK, Haanpää ML et al (2010) Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain: an overview and literature update. Mayo Clin Proc 85:S3–S14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meier T, Wasner G, Faust M, Kuntzer T, Ochsner F, Hueppe M et al (2003) Efficacy of lidocaine patch 5 % in the treatment of focal peripheral neurophatic pain syndromes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Pain 106:151–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Galer BS, Rowbotham MC, Perander J, Friedman E (1999) Topical lidocaine patch relieves postherpetic neuralgia more effectively than a vehicle topical patch: results of an enrichment enrollment study. Pain 80:533–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rowbotham MC, Davies PS, Verkempinck C, Galer BS (1996) Lidocaine patch: double-blind, controlled study of a new treatment for post-herpetic neuralgia. Pain 65:39–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fleming JA, O’Connor BD (2009) Use of lidocaine patches for neuropathic pain in a comprehensive cancer centre. Pain Res Manage 14:381–388

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cheville A, Sloan J, Northfelt D, Jillella A, Wong G, Bearden J et al (2009) Use of a lidocaine patch in the management of postsurgical neuropathic pain in patients with cancer: a phase III double-blind crossover study (N01CB). Support Care Canc 17:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Freynhagen R, Baron R, Gockel V, Tölle TR (2006) PainDETECT: a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Curr Med Res Opin 22:1911–1920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Krumova E, Zeller M, Westermann A, Maier C (2012) Lidocaine patch (5 %) produces a selective, but incomplete block of Adelta and C fibers. Pain 153:273–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hans G, Joukes E, Verhulst J, Vercauteren M (2009) Management of neuropathic pain after surgical and non-surgical trauma with lidocaine 5 % patches: study of 40 consecutive cases. Curr Med Res Opin 25:2737–2743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gammaitoni AR, Davis MW (2002) Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of lidocaine patch 5 % with extended doping. Ann Pharmacother 36:236–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Financial disclosure

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Garzón-Rodríguez.

Additional information

This paper was presented as a poster at the MASCC/ISOO 2012. International Symposium on Supportive Care in Cancer New York City on June 28–30 2012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garzón-Rodríguez, C., Casals Merchan, M., Calsina-Berna, A. et al. Lidocaine 5 % patches as an effective short-term co-analgesic in cancer pain. Preliminary results. Support Care Cancer 21, 3153–3158 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1948-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1948-7

Keywords

Navigation