Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a prospective case–control study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BC) before the diagnosis of BC was known, thus before cystectomy, and until 1 year postcystectomy. The differences in outcomes between a health status (HS) and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires were examined.

Methods

From July 2007 to July 2010, 598 patients with primary hematuria were enrolled in this prospective, multi-centre case–control (CC) study. Patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC; N = 18) were compared with patients with other causes of hematuria (CC, N = 20). Measurement points were before diagnosis as well as 3, 6 and 12 months postcystectomy. Questionnaires used were the WHOQOL-BREF, SF-12, International Index of Erectile Function, and 10-item STAI-Trait scale.

Results

Prediagnosis patients who later appeared to have BC had the same QoL compared to CC patients. The prediagnosis physical component scale of HS and sexual function were significantly lower for RC vs. CC patients. RC patients had a better prediagnostic QoL and HS than postcystectomy at all time points.

Conclusions

This is the first case–control study with a baseline measurement of PROs before the diagnosis of BC was known. It shows lower physical health and sexual function for RC vs. CC before diagnosis is known. Until 1 year postcystectomy, QoL does not return to baseline level. Future studies including comorbidity and smoking history are needed to examine the generalizability of our results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stenzyl A, Witjes JA, Compérat E, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Kuczyk M et al. (2012). Resource document. Guideline bladder cancer, muscle-invasive and metastatic. European Association of Urology. Accessed January, 2013

  2. Goossens-Laan CA, Visser O, Hulshof MCCM, Wouters MW, Bosch JLHR, Coebergh JWW et al (2011) Survival after treatment for carcinoma invading bladder muscle: a Dutch population-based study on the impact of hospital volume. Br J Urol Int 110(2):226–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Elting LS, Pettaway C, Bekele BN, Grossman HB, Cooksley C, Avritscher EB (2005) Correlation between annual volume of cystectomy, professional staffing, and outcomes: a statewide, population-based study. Cancer 104(5):975–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCabe JE, Jibawi A, Javle P (2005) Defining the minimum hospital case-load to achieve optimum outcomes in radical cystectomy. Br J Urol Int 96(6):806–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, Brook CM, Cronin AM, Savage C et al (2008) Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 55(1):164–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dindo D, Dermartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 63336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. National steergroup guideline bladder cancer of the Integral Cancer Centres: Guideline urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. National guideline on diagnostics, treatment and follow-up of urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. version 1.0. Resource document http://www.oncoline.nl/urotheelcarcinoom-van-de-blaas. Accessed Januari 2013.

  8. Cooperberg MR, Porter MP, Konety BR (2009) Candidate quality of care indicators for localized bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 27(4):435–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. WHOQOL Group (1994) Development of the WHOQOL: rationale and current status. Int J Ment Heal 23:24–56

    Google Scholar 

  10. WONCA (1995) An international glossary for general/family practice. WONCA Classification Committee. Fam Pract 12(3):341–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Vries J (2001) Quality of life assesment. In: Vingerhoets AJJM, Assessment in Behavioural Medicine. Brunner-Routlegde, Hove, pp 353–370

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gerharz EW, Mansson A, Hunt S, Skinner EC, Mansson W (2005) Quality of life after cystectomy and urinary diversion: an evidence based analysis. J Urol 174(5):1729–1736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Somani BK, Maclennan SJ, N'dow J (2010) Quality of life with urinary diversion. Eur Urol 9(10):763–771

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porter MP, Penson DF (2005) Health related quality of life after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer: a systematic review and critical analysis of the literature. J Urol 173(4):1318–1322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Steeg AF, De Vries J, Roukema JA (2004) Quality of life and health status in breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 30(10):1051–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. WHOQOL Group (1998) Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 28(3):551–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Vries J, Van Heck GL (1995) De Nederlandse versie van de WHOQOL-100 [The Dutch version of the WHOQOL-100]. Tilburg, the Netherlands, Tilburg University. Thesis/Dissertation

  18. The WHOQOL Group (1998) The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 46(12):1569–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonomi AE, Patrick DL, Bushnell DM, Martin M (2000) Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument. J Clin Epidemiol 53(1):1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Ploeg H, Defares P, Spielberger C (1980) Manual for the Self-Judgment Questionnaire ZBV: a dutch adaptation of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI-DY. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Vries J, Van Heck GL (2013) Development of a short version of the Dutch version of the Spielberger STAI Trait Anxiety scale in women suspected of breast cancer and breast cancer survivors. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 20(2):215–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care 34(3):220–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ware J (1997). SF-36 Health survey manual and interpretation guide: MA: Health Institue, New Engeland Medical Center

  24. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A et al (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11(3):570–579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mansson A, Davidsson T, Hunt S, Mansson W (2002) The quality of life in men after radical cystectomy with a continent cutaneous diversion or orthotopic bladder substitution: is there a difference? Br J Urol Int 90(4):386–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49(6):822–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Norman RW, Currow DC (2005) Supportive care for the urology patient. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Goossens-Laan CA, Kil PJ, Jl B, De Vries J (2013) Pre-diagnosis Quality of Life (QoL) in patients with haematuria: Comparison of bladder cancer with other causes. Qual Life Res. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0163-1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kulaksizoglu H, Toktas G, Kulaksizoglu IB, Aglamis E, Unluer E (2002) When should quality of life be measured after radical cystectomy? Eur Urol 42:350–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yuh B, Butt Z, Fazili A, Piacente P, Tan W, Wilding G et al (2009) Short-term quality-of-life assessed after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a prospective analysis. Br J Urol Int 103:800–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mrs. Yvonne de Vuijst, research nurse, for the help with the data collection and the administration involved in this study. In addition, our gratitude goes to the participating hospitals (University Medical Centre Utrecht; St. Elisabeth Hospital and TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg; Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ‘s Hertogenbosch; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven) for patient inclusion.

Conflict of interest

None

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catharina A. Goossens - Laan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goossens - Laan, C.A., Kil, P.J.M., Bosch, J.L.H.R. et al. Patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a prospective case–control study. Support Care Cancer 22, 189–200 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1946-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1946-9

Keywords

Navigation