Abstract
Purpose
Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are in need of specialized information about late effects of treatment. In the current study, we assessed the perceived usability and satisfaction with the content of a national website with information on late effects and analyzed possible determinants related to website usability and content satisfaction.
Methods
CCS and their parents were contacted through our local follow-up program and via online media to complete an online questionnaire regarding their baseline characteristics, medical decision style, and the usability and content of the website. Usability was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a validated questionnaire resulting in a score from 0 to 100. For the content rating, we constructed a six-item scale resulting in a score from 1 to 5 (Cronbach's α, 0.83). Comments were analyzed qualitatively.
Results
Fifty-five survivors and forty-three parents of survivors completed the questionnaire. Median age of respondents was 41 years (range, 17–58). Respondents rated the website's usability with a mean SUS score of 72.5 (95 % CI, 69.2–74.9). The mean content rating was 3.7 (95 % CI, 3.5–3.8). No determinants were significantly related to the perceived usability or content satisfaction in multivariate analyses. Qualitative analysis revealed respondents' preference for more detailed and even scientific information on late effects.
Conclusion
Respondents were satisfied with the usability and the contents of a website that targeted at their information needs. As knowledge about late effects is still limited among survivors, a website can be a valuable resource to improve their knowledge, promote healthy behavior, and in the end, improve their quality of life.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stiller CA, Marcos-Gragera R, Ardanaz E et al (2006) Geographical patterns of childhood cancer incidence in Europe, 1988–1997. Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer 42:1952–1960
Gatta G, Zigon G, Capocaccia R et al (2009) Survival of European children and young adults with cancer diagnosed 1995–2002. Eur J Cancer 45:992–1005
Reulen RC, Winter DL, Frobisher C et al (2010) Long-term cause-specific mortality among survivors of childhood cancer. JAMA 304:172–179
Geenen MM, Cardous-Ubbink MC, Kremer LC et al (2007) Medical assessment of adverse health outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. JAMA 297:2705–2715
Hess SL, Johannsdottir IM, Hamre H et al (2011) Adult survivors of childhood malignant lymphoma are not aware of their risk of late effects. Acta Oncol 50:653–659
Kadan-Lottick NS, Robison LL, Gurney JG et al (2002) Childhood cancer survivors' knowledge about their past diagnosis and treatment: Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. JAMA 287:1832–1839
Byrne J, Lewis S, Halamek L et al (1989) Childhood cancer survivors' knowledge of their diagnosis and treatment. Ann Intern Med 110:400–403
Bashore L (2004) Childhood and adolescent cancer survivors' knowledge of their disease and effects of treatment. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 21:98–102
Caprino D, Wiley TJ, Massimo L (2004) Childhood cancer survivors in the dark. J Clin Oncol 22:2748–2750
Landier W, Wallace WH, Hudson MM (2006) Long-term follow-up of pediatric cancer survivors: education, surveillance, and screening. Pediatr Blood Cancer 46:149–158
Kremer LCM, Jaspers MWM, van Leeuwen FE et al (2006) National guidelines for follow-up of childhood cancer survivors. Tijdschr Kindergeneeskd 74:214–218
Ossebaard HC, Seydel ER, van Gemert-Pijnen L (2012) Online usability and patients with long-term conditions: a mixed-methods approach. Int J Med Inform 81:374–387
Kelders SM, Van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Werkman A et al (2011) Effectiveness of a Web-based intervention aimed at healthy dietary and physical activity behavior: a randomized controlled trial about users and usage. J Med Internet Res 13:e32
Moore BD III (2005) Neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 30:51–63
Knijnenburg SL, Kremer LC, Van den Bos C et al (2010) Health information needs of childhood cancer survivors and their family. Pediatr Blood Cancer 54:123–127
Pierce PF (1993) Deciding on breast cancer treatment: a description of decision behavior. Nurs Res 42:22–28
Pierce PF (1995) Michigan Assessment of Decision Style (MADS). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Jaspers MW (2009) A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence. Int J Med Inform 78:340–353
Pierce PF (1996) When the patient chooses: describing unaided decisions in health care. Hum Factors 38:278–287
Koedoot CG, de Haan RJ, Stiggelbout AM et al (2003) Palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care? A prospective study explaining patients' treatment preference and choice. Br J Cancer 89:2219–2226
Molenaar S, Sprangers MA, Rutgers EJ et al (2001) Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 19:1676–1687
Kadmon I, Pierce P, Antonakos CL (2012) Elder women's decision-making in breast cancer care: an Israeli study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 16:233–237
Brooke J (1996) SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL (eds) Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 189–194
Tullis TS, Stetson JN (2004) A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. Paper presented at the UPA 2004 conference, Minneapolis, MN, 7–11 June 2004, p 1–12
Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J (2009) Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud 4:114–123
Blaauwbroek R, Tuinier W, Meyboom-de JB (2008) Shared care by paediatric oncologists and family doctors for long-term follow-up of adult childhood cancer survivors: a pilot study. Lancet Oncol 9:232–238
Brouwer W, Oenema A, Crutzen R (2008) An exploration of factors related to dissemination of and exposure to internet-delivered behavior change interventions aimed at adults: a Delphi study approach. J Med Internet Res 10:e10
Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, Brouwer W (2009) A conceptual framework for understanding and improving adolescents' exposure to Internet-delivered interventions. Health Promot Int 24:277–284
Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, Brouwer W (2008) Internet-delivered interventions aimed at adolescents: a Delphi study on dissemination and exposure. Health Educ Res 23:427–439
Eysenbach G (2005) The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res 7:e11
Wangberg SC, Bergmo TS, Johnsen JA (2008) Adherence in Internet-based interventions. Patient Prefer Adherence 2:57–65
Rosser BA, Vowles KE, Keogh E (2009) Technologically-assisted behaviour change: a systematic review of studies of novel technologies for the management of chronic illness. J Telemed Telecare 15:327–338
Ward AM, Heneghan C, Perera R (2010) What are the basic self-monitoring components for cardiovascular risk management? BMC Med Res Methodol 10:105
Lustria ML, Cortese J, Noar SM, Glueckauf RL (2009) Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the Web: review and analysis of key components. Patient Educ Couns 74:156–173
Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, Brouwer W (2009) Effectiveness of online word of mouth on exposure to an Internet-delivered intervention. Psychol Health 24:651–661
Stinson JN, White M, Breakey V (2011) Perspectives on quality and content of information on the internet for adolescents with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 57:97–104
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Valerie Strategier for her efforts in recruiting respondents through the DCCPO. We would also like to express our gratitude to the following members of the steering board of the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group's Late Effects Registry for their support: Wim J. Tissing, Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Flora E. van Leeuwen, Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, Dennis de Jongh, Bep Verkerk, Cécile Ronckers, Dorine Bresters, Jacoba J. Groot-Loonen, Hanneke de Ridder, Liedeke Postma, Willemtje V. Dolsma, Martha A. Grootenhuis, Sebastiaan Neggers, and Valerie Strategier.
Conflict of interest
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knijnenburg, S.L., Kremer, L.C., Versluys, A.B. et al. Evaluation of a patient information website for childhood cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 21, 919–926 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1604-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1604-7