Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can the distress thermometer (DT) identify significant psychological distress in long-term cancer survivors?: a comparison with the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

As the number of cancer survivors continues to grow, identification of brief, valid psychological screening measures is critical for providing these survivors with appropriate psychosocial care. The distress thermometer (DT) is a one-item distress screening recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for screening cancer patients during their treatment.

Method

In this study, the validity of the DT for identifying psychological distress in cancer survivors was evaluated by comparing results of the DT to the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) in a sample of 120 survivors of adult onset cancer.

Results

Results indicated that when using the NCCN suggested cutoff score of 5, the DT only identified 10 of the 21 BSI-18 positive cases of psychological distress (sensitivity 47.6%; specificity 90.9%). Using an alternative DT cutoff score of 4, 12 of the 21 BSI-18 positive cases were identified (sensitivity 51.7%; specificity 89.9%).

Conclusions

The results do not support the validity of the DT in survivors of adult cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) Cancer survivors—United States, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 60(9):269–272

    Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Medicine (2008) Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial needs. In: Adler NE, Page AEK (eds) The National Academies, Washington

  3. Institute of Medicine (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. In: Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (eds) The National Academics, Washington

  4. Living beyond cancer: finding a new balance. President’s Cancer Panel 2003–2004 Annual Report 2003

  5. Deimling GT et al (2002) Cancer survivorship and psychological distress in later life. Psychooncology 11(6):479–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffman BM et al (2004) Screening for distress in cancer patients: the NCCN rapid-screening measure. Psychooncology 13(11):792–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Patrick DL et al (2004) National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference statement: symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue, July 15–17, 2002. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 32:9–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryan H et al (2005) How to recognize and manage psychological distress in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 14(1):7–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobsen PB et al (2005) Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients: a multicenter evaluation of the distress thermometer. Cancer 103(7):1494–1502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell A (2007) Pooled results from 38 analyses of the accuracy of distress thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders. J Clin Oncol 25(29):4670–4681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. NCCN (2003) Distress management clinical practice guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 1:344–374

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ransom S, Jacobsen PB, Booth-Jones M (2006) Validation of the distress thermometer with bone marrow transplant patients. Psychooncology 15(7):604–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zwahlen D et al (2008) Screening cancer patients’ families with the distress thermometer (DT): a validation study. Psychooncology 17(10):959–966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coscarelli A, Recklitis CJ, Ahmed K (2011) Long-term psychological well-being: strategies for assessment and intervention. In: Feuerstein M, Ganz PA (eds) Health services for cancer survivors. Springer, New York, pp 125–152

  15. Recklitis CJ et al (2007) Screening adult survivors of childhood cancer with the distress thermometer: a comparison with the SCL-90-R. Psychooncology 16(11):1046–1049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Derogatis LR. BSI 18: Brief Symptom Inventory 18. 2000, Minneapolis: National Computer Systems, Inc.

  17. Recklitis CJ et al (2006) Factor structure of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 in adult survivors of childhood cancer: results from the childhood cancer survivor study. Psychol Assess 18(1):22–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Galdon MJ et al (2008) Psychometric properties of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 in a Spanish breast cancer sample. J Psychosom Res 65(6):533–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zabora J et al (2001) A new psychosocial screening instrument for use with cancer patients. Psychosomatics 42(3):241–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nekolaichuk CL et al (2011) Referral patterns and psychosocial distress in cancer patients accessing a psycho-oncology counseling service. Psychooncology 20(3):326–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz MR et al (2004) Screening for depression in head and neck cancer. Psychooncology 13(4):269–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Recklitis CJ, Rodriguez P (2006) Screening childhood cancer survivors with the Brief Symptom Inventory-18: classification agreement with the symptom checklist-90-revised. Psychooncology

  23. Snowden A et al (2011) The clinical utility of the distress thermometer: a review. Br J Nurs 20(4):220–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Craike MJ, Livingston PM, Warne C (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of the distress impact thermometer for the detection of psychological distress among CRC survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol 29(3):231–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vodermaier A, Linden W, Siu C (2009) Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: a systematic review of assessment instruments. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(21):1464–1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Recklitis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merport, A., Bober, S.L., Grose, A. et al. Can the distress thermometer (DT) identify significant psychological distress in long-term cancer survivors?: a comparison with the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Support Care Cancer 20, 195–198 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1269-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1269-7

Keywords

Navigation