Introduction

Breast cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer among women [1]. Endocrine therapy is an essential part of the adjuvant treatment for oestrogen receptor-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer [2]. This treatment exerts its effect by reducing the availability of oestrogen to micro-metastatic tumour cells. Meta-analyses have shown the efficacy of this treatment in improving disease-free and overall survival in women with early-stage as well as advanced breast cancer [37]. Current treatment standards involve (≥) 5 years of endocrine therapy, including tamoxifen for premenopausal women and aromatase inhibitors for postmenopausal women.

As the number of breast cancer patients (including younger women) treated for an extensive period of time is increasing, there is increased concern about long-term treatment-related symptoms and psychological well-being [8]. A better understanding of the psychosocial consequences of breast cancer on the quality of life after breast cancer can assist in recommendations for future treatment [9]. In a review including 125 references on psychosocial functioning of survivors of breast cancer, it is concluded that the majority of breast cancer survivors adjusted well 2 years since their first diagnosis. However, there is a subgroup of survivors reporting after-treatment psychological distress. The estimates for this group range from 5% to 50% [8].

We hypothesized that psychological distress accompanied with breast cancer diagnosis and/or the side effects of adjuvant therapy leads to an increased use of psychotropic medication in female breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy. Therefore, we assessed the use of psychotropic medication in female patients treated with endocrine therapy over time and compared the use of psychotropic medication with an age- and family physician-matched cohort of women without cancer.

Patients and methods

Drug prescription data

The IADB is situated in the North of the Netherlands, covering an area of 3.4 million inhabitants. The IADB.nl is a pharmacy drug prescription database in the North of the Netherlands covering a population of 500,000. All prescriptions for persons living in the IADB area are prospectively and consecutively entered into the pharmacy database. These prescriptions are, regardless of prescriber, insurance or reimbursement status, except over-the-counter (OTC) drugs and drugs dispensed during a hospital stay. So, all prescribed drugs (except in hospital use and OTC drugs) delivered to this population are available in the database. We have compared the drug use in our database with national prescription databases and found for all main drug groups comparable prevalences of drug use among sex and different age groups. Based on that, the IADB.nl can be considered as a database that is representative for the Netherlands regarding drug exposure. We have a methodological article in preparation on this topic.

Each prescription record comprises information about the drug, side effects, date of dispensing, amount dispensed, dose regimen and the prescribing physician. The indication for the prescription is not known. All drugs are coded according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification [11, 12]. For each patient, there are sex, date of birth, family physician and a unique, anonymous identifier. Due to a high patient pharmacy commitment in the Netherlands and sophisticated pharmacy software, the prescription records for each patient are virtually complete [13].

The role of the general practitioner

In the Netherlands, general practitioners hold a key position in health care. They are the first health care professionals to see people when they are ill, and they act as gatekeepers to secondary care. Most cases that present to a general practice are taken care of by the general practitioner alone. Sometime after primary treatment, the care for the patient is shifted back from hospital to general practice. When the care for the patient is shifted back to general practice, the general practitioner is responsible for the prescription of drugs. The most common indication for prescribing drugs in general practice is cardiovascular diseases, followed by diabetes mellitus and depression, respectively [14].

Females treated with endocrine therapy

In the Netherlands, endocrine and psychotropic medications are prescription drugs and cannot be obtained OTC. In the Netherlands, endocrine therapy is not indicated for the prevention of breast cancer, also not in high-risk women.

All women who were over 20 years of age during the study period 1994–2006 and had at least one prescription of anti-oestrogens (tamoxifen, fulvestrant) or aromatase inhibitors (anastrazole, letrozole, exemestane) were selected. Women with at least one prescription of anti-oestrogens or aromatase inhibitors were included in the analysis when there was information in the IADB database for a minimum of 180 days before the start date of adjuvant hormonal treatment. The analysis was based on these anti-oestrogens and aromatase inhibitors because these products are the preferred endocrine treatments for breast cancer in the Netherlands.

Women in the reference population

To compare the use of psychotropic medication among women using anti-oestrogens with the use of psychotropic medication among women not using anti-oestrogens, there were two options. Firstly, we could use the data of all women not using anti-oestrogens and correct for bias due to age and time in follow-up in the analysis. The second option was to draw a stratified sample of women not using anti-oestrogens from the cohort and correct in this way for bias due to age and time in follow-up. The reference population included women without any prescription of anti-oestrogens or aromatase inhibitors. In addition, women with any prescription of anti-neoplastic and immuno-modulating agents (ATC classification group L) were excluded. From this group, three to four women were matched for age at the start date of the anti-oestrogens or aromatase inhibitors prescription and family physician of the women in the index group. This start date was considered as the “theoretical” start date for women in the reference population. Women in the reference population could only be matched if there was information available in the IADB for at least 180 days before the theoretical start date. On average, there was a match of 3.7 reference women per woman with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Psychotropic medication

Psychotropic medication was classified with the use of the following ATC codes: N05B (anxiolytics), N05C (hypnotics and sedatives) and N06A (anti-depressants).

Analyses

For females treated with endocrine therapy, the date of the first prescription of anti-oestrogens or aromatase inhibitors was considered as the starting date in the analysis. The women from the reference population received the starting date from the women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to whom they were matched.

To assess whether the start of psychotropic medication was increased, the cohort of female breast cancer survivors (index group, n = 2,172) was compared with an age- and family physician-matched group of women without cancer (the reference population, n = 8,129), and the incidence risk ratio (IRR) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. The IRR was calculated as the incidence rate (IR) of the index group divided by the IR of the reference group [10]. For calculation of the IR, given the distribution of the data, 1 year before the starting date of adjuvant therapy was chosen as the starting point for follow-up. The number of patient days in the database was measured from this starting point for follow-up up until either the prescription date of psychotropic medication or the last known date of that person in the database. The incidence of drug prescribing was calculated as the number of incidence cases divided by the total number of patient days at risk. An incidence case was defined as a woman who did not receive a prescription for this medication for the last 180 days.

To assess the prescriptions of psychotropic medication over time, the half-year prevalence of these psychotropic medication prescriptions and the 95% CIs were calculated in the index as well as the reference group. The half-year prevalence was defined as the proportion of women having a psychotropic medication prescription during a half year and was calculated as the number of women who use psychotropic medication per 182 days (half year), divided by the total number of women present in that period. All statistical analyses were performed by Excel and SPSS 16.0. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The women in the study

In the IADB database, there were 2,172 female breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy. The reference group consisted of 8,129 women. The median age of the breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy was 64 (20–93), with a median follow-up time of 2.6 years. The median age of women in the reference group was 62 (20–93), with a median follow-up time of 3.8 years (see Table 1). The number of women per year that started with tamoxifen, fulvestrant, anastrazole, letrozole and exemestane is shown in Table 2.

Table 1 Characteristics of women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the index group and women in the reference group
Table 2 Number of starters per year

Starting psychotropic medication

There are significantly more starting prescriptions of psychotropic medication for female breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy when compared to women in the reference group (see Table 3). This increase is observed for all three groups of psychotropic medication, anxiolytics (IRR 2.07, 95% CI 1.87–2.29), hypnotics and sedatives (IRR 2.59, 95% CI 2.34–2.87) and anti-depressants (IRR 1.46, 95% CI 1.28–1.65). Table 4 presents the specific drugs in the three psychotropic groups that were mostly prescribed. Of the 552 breast cancer patients who started anxiolytics, 313 received oxazepam. Of the 580 who started with hypnotics and sedatives, 383 received temazepam. Among the 331 who started an anti-depressant, 144 received amitriptyline, and 66 (20%) received the combination paroxetine and tamoxifen (Table 4).

Table 3 Population at risk (n), incident cases (cases), incident rate (per 100,000 patient days) and IRR with 95% CI for psychotropic medication
Table 4 Number of psychotropic drug users per group and specific drugs

Psychotropic medication use

The prevalence of psychotropic medication use (anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives and anti-depressants) is presented in Fig. 1. The prevalence of psychotropic medication use (prevalence 0.45, 95% CI 0.43–0.47) is significantly increased among breast cancer patients using endocrine therapy when compared to the reference group (prevalence 0.32, 95% CI 0.31–0.32). In the period a half year after the start, there is still an increase of psychotropic medication use, although from this period, a decrease is observed.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Prevalence of psychotropic medication use in index and reference groups. Medication groups included: anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives and anti-depressants

In Fig. 2, the prevalence of psychotropic use among the female breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy is stratified for anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives and anti-depressants. Before the start of hormonal therapy, anxiolytics are most frequently prescribed, followed by hypnotics and sedatives, and anti-depressants. After the start of hormonal therapy, hypnotics and sedatives are prescribed most frequently. In the period 6 months before the start of hormonal therapy, the prevalences of anxiolytics and hypnotics and sedatives are significantly increased as compared with the use of these drugs longer before. For anxiolytics, the prevalence is 0.26 (95% CI 0.24–0.27), and for hypnotics and sedatives, the prevalence is 0.24 (95% CI 0.23–0.26) (Fig. 2). The prevalence of anti-depressant use is not increased.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence of psychotropic medication per subgroup: anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives and anti-depressants among index group

Discussion

This large cohort study examined the use of psychotropic medication in women with breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy (n = 2,172) as compared to a group of matched women without cancer (n = 8,129). An increased prescribing of psychotropic medication in these women treated with endocrine therapy was shown, as was hypothesized. There was an increased start for anxiolytics (IRR 2.07, 95% CI 1.87–2.29), hypnotics and sedatives (IRR 2.59, 95% CI 2.34–2.87) and anti-depressants (IRR 1.46, 95% CI 1.28–1.65). Anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives were used for a longer time, whereas such a continuous increased use was not observed for anti-depressants. Among the women with anti-depressants, 20% received the drug combination of paroxetine and tamoxifen.

The increased percentage of women with breast cancer starting to use anxiolytics, hypnotics, sedatives and anti-depressants indicates that in these women, there is an increased risk for psychological disorders. This is also mentioned in literature. Psychological problems are frequently mentioned in women treated for breast cancer, though there is a wide range in the estimated incidence [8, 9, 15]. To give an example, in a study including 1,083 women with a history of breast cancer (median 4 years after diagnosis) recruited through a population-based cancer registry (66% response rate), 38% of patients reported moderate to high anxiety, 22% moderate to high depression and 12% posttraumatic disorder [16]. In addition, two reviews on women with a history of breast cancer concluded that there is a substantial effect of adjuvant endocrine therapy on the health-related quality of life [9, 17]. Potential explanations for this impact on health-related quality of life are side effects of treatment due to premature menopause and mood disturbances [9]. High depression and anxiety levels in patients after breast cancer influence the coping with cancer and quality of life adversely [18].

We observed a statistically significant increase in the prescription of anti-depressants (IRR 1.46, 95% CI 1.28–1.65). The prevalence of depression among early breast cancer women is estimated to be twice as many as that seen in the general population [19]. In addition, in our study, anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives were used for a longer time, whereas such a continuous increased use was not observed for anti-depressants. In literature, the increased prevalence of depression in women with a history of breast cancer is seen especially during the first year after diagnosis [19]. It can be stated that depression is undertreated among the breast cancer population [20]. On the other hand, problems of depression are not always treated with anti-depressants, but also with anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives, and not all patients are willing to use medication for their depressed feelings. One of the most prescribed anti-depressants in this study was amitriptyline. In a low dose, amitriptyline can be prescribed for neuropathy as well as for sleep disturbances. As the prescribed dose distribution of amitriptyline was equal for women with breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy and for women without cancer (data not presented), we expected no effect on the presented incidence risk ratios. The relatively high prevalence of hypnotics (such as temazepam) and anti-depressants after start of endocrine treatment may also be related to the increased incidence of sleeping disorders due to hot flashes as one of the menopausal symptoms after starting endocrine treatment [21]. Improved sleeping quality on a combination of venlafaxine and anti-hypnotics was recently found to contribute to improved quality of life in a similar group of breast cancer patients [22].

There are many reported side effects associated with use of psychotropic drugs. Side effects include but are not limited to: dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, urinary retention, sedation, sleep disruption, weight gain or loss, headache, nausea, agitation, inability to achieve an orgasm, decreased libido and anxiety [clinicaldepression.com]. Long-term use of anxiolytics has been a cause for concern because of the possibility of dependency and other adverse consequences. Long-term effects of anxiolytics are the following: dependence, rebound anxiety, memory impairment and an increased risk of falling in elderly persons taking benzodiazepines [23]. Among the women with anti-depressants, 20% received the drug combination of paroxetine and tamoxifen. The use of paroxetine in this study is remarkable. A recent study showed that the use of paroxetine during tamoxifen treatment is associated with an increased risk of death from breast cancer [24]. Tamoxifen is a prodrug that is metabolised to active metabolite endoxifen by the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme system. Paroxetine is a potent irreversible CYP 2D6 inhibitor that can prevent the metabolic activation of tamoxifen into the active metabolite endoxifen. Based on the study of Kelly et al., it is recommended to avoid this combination, and in case an anti-depressant is necessary, an anti-depressant with little or no inhibition of CYP 2D6 should be given. This is supported in the recently published guidelines on the use of co-medication with tamoxifen [25]. However, because only short-term use of anti-depressants was found in this study, this may narrow the scope of this issue.

A strong point of the analysis presented here is that the used IADB database includes virtually complete prescription records for the patients covered by this database, except OTC drugs and drugs dispensed during a hospital stay [13]. As neither psychotropic medication nor endocrine therapies are OTC drugs in the Netherlands, this will not influence the outcomes. The estimated population size covered by the IADB.nl increased from 264.664 persons in 1996 to approximately 500,000 persons in 1999 and has remained stable since. The women from the index group could be considered as representative of the Dutch population. In addition, the IADB.nl can be considered as a database that is representative for the Netherlands regarding drug prescriptions (manuscript in preparation). Regarding other prescriptions, there were no differences between women from the index group and women from the reference group.

A weak point is that there are no diagnoses of diseases in this database. As we have very strict guidelines for the prescription of endocrine treatment in the Netherlands [http://www.oncoline.nl/], we were able to use a prescription of endocrine treatment as a proxy for a diagnosis of breast cancer. As a consequence, the following women were not included in our analysis: women with hormone-negative tumours, women with primary metastases and women with very small tumours. As our included sample is large, we do not expect that missing these groups might have a strong impact on the presented incidence risk ratios. In addition, we cannot analyse whether the increased use of psychotropic medication among breast cancer patients treated with endocrine treatment is related to the diagnosis of breast cancer or the related treatment. There is no formal evaluation of patients for mood disorder, anxiety or panic. We cannot be certain that the increased use of psychotropic medication is related to depression or anxiety. Benzodiazepines can also be prescribed for sleep and anti-depressants for pain.

In conclusion, in this large cohort study on breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy, we found an increased use of psychotropic medication, compared to the reference group. This may be related to the reported increased psychological distress in these patients. Anti-depressants were only prescribed for a short time. We do not know whether this is related to the condition of the patient with breast cancer or to the diagnostics of the prescriber. These data can contribute to an improved awareness of the impact of breast cancer (treatment) on quality of life and therefore potentially to the optimizing of support for these patients.