Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of the Internet in supporting and informing carers of people with cancer: a literature review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Internet is an expanding source of information and support for cancer patients and their families. Studies mostly report patient Internet use. Little is known about how carers (families/informal caregivers/friends) use the Internet and what they find useful.

Aim

The aim of this paper was to review the literature on the role of the Internet in supporting and informing carers of people with cancer.

Materials and methods

Findings are based on a review of published studies identified from 1996–2009 Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and 2002–2009 PsycINFO, Cochrane database and Google Scholar. Key search words used were cancer, patient, information, Internet, online, web, support, family, carer, caregiver and friend.

Results

One hundred forty-five abstracts were reviewed. Fifty-two articles were retrieved in full text. Twenty of the 52 articles were critically appraised using the appropriate Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. All studies retrieved were level IV evidence. Most compared carer and patient Internet use with other cancer information sources or analysed content of postings to web sites. Some reported on patient ‘indirect’ Internet use through carers. Heterogeneity of results related to different study aims, diversity in study tools, varying sample sizes and differing cancer populations. Broadly, Internet use can be divided into information searching and support group activity. Carers access Internet information to problem solve; however, they report doctors as their most preferred information source. They would like to have e-mail communication with Health Care Professionals to ask questions and clarify information. Participation in online support groups provides information tailored to individual needs and peer support.

Implications for practice

The Internet may be a primary or secondary source of information and can be used to access services. Routine assessment of carers’ Internet use, prescribing of Internet sites and e-mail communication with carers are possible areas for practice improvement. The current level of evidence is not ideal to influence policy development.

Conclusions

Research is required to evaluate carer Internet use in the rapidly changing world of health and technology. Interactive Internet applications developed specifically for carer use have the potential to prepare, inform and support the carer in their ever-expanding health care role. The impact of these services on carer quality of life also requires investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson AS, Klemm P (2008) The Internet: friend or foe when providing patient education. Clin J Oncol Nurs 12:55–63. doi:10.1188/08.CJON.55-63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Basch E, Thaler H, Shi W, Yakren S, Schrag D (2004) Use of Internet resources by patients with cancer and their companions. Cancer 100:2476–2483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bastian H (2008) Health literacy and patient information: developing the methodology for a national evidence based health website. Patient Educ Couns 73:551–556. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bevan JL, Pecchioni LL (2008) Understanding the impact of family caregiver cancer literacy on patient health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 71:356–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blackburn C, Read J, Hughes N (2005) Carers and the digital divide: factors affecting Internet use among carers in the UK. Heath Soc Care Community 13:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bovi A (2003) Ethical guidelines for use of electronic mail between patients and physicians. The American Journal of Bioethics 3:W43–W47 (available via http://www.bioethics.net/journal/j_articles.php?aid=85, accessed 29 July 2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burridge L, Winch S, Clavarino A (2007) Reluctance to care. A systematic review and development of a conceptual framework. Cancer Nurs 30:E9–E11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. California Health Foundation (2008) The wisdom of patients: health care meets online social media. Available via http://api.ning.com/files/1mCGcddTIu2NjqO5Z4jyAY-bMIET61aJyvOajFw0c4UViVrRp7Uf3duzSZw0r5ZnrN9BYIeTWJG5hjMHrNEREWb5oydwkhkR/TheWisdomofPatients2008.pdf, accessed March 30 2009

  9. Chen X, Siu L (2001) Impact of the media and the Internet on oncology: survey of cancer patients and oncologists in Canada. J Clin Oncol 19:4291–4297

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark P, Gomez E (2001) Details on demand: consumers, cancer information, and the Internet. Clin J Oncol Nurs 5:19–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coleman J, Olsen S, Sauter P, Baker D, Hodgin M, Stanfield C, Emerling A, Hruban R, Nolan M (2005) The effect of frequently asked questions module on a pancreatic cancer web site patient/family chat room. Cancer Nurs 28:460–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cornwall A, Moore S, Plant H (2008) Embracing technology: patients’, family members’ and nurse specialist’ experience of communicating using email. Eur J Oncol Nurs 12:198–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dilts D, Ridner SH, Franco A, Murphy B (2009) Patients with cancer and email: implications for clinical communication. Support Care Cancer 17:1049–1056. doi:10.1007/s00520-008-0538-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Doolittle GC, Spaulding A (2005) Online cancer services: types of services offered and associated health outcomes. J Med Internet Res 7(3):e35. doi:10.2196/jmir.7.3.e35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Edgar L, Greenberg A, Remmer J (2001) Providing Internet lessons to oncology patients and family members: a shared project. Psychooncology 11:439–446

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elkin N (2008) iCrossing ‘How America searches: health and wellness’. Available via http://api.ning.com/files/aQ*9UpEJWIfxu4YcpKwCrqAlruSAvElSuXvRBd2v4c5rY4MnaNkuPE96hQp*JxAkduKxQzK4pioEMN7DfQKEGVOGrMiaCd3W/SearchingforHealth2008.pdf, accessed March 30, 2009

  17. Eriksson E, Lauri S (2000) Informational and emotional support for cancer patients’ relatives. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 9:8–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eysenbach G, Köhler C (2002) How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 324:573–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eysenbach G (2003) The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin 53:356–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fox S (2006) Online Health Search 2006 Pew Internet Project. Available via http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/Online-Health-Search-2006.aspx, accessed March 30, 2009

  21. Ferguson T, Frydman G (2004) The first generation of e-patients. BMJ 328:1148–1149. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Future Foundation (2009) The future of remote diagnosis and prescription services. An analysis commissioned by Lloyds Pharmacy. Available via http://www.lloydspharmacy.com/wps/wcm/connect/ebfb41804f30c58482c38bfaff868ea2/Future+Foundation+report+-+FINAL.pdf?MOD=AJPERES, accessed 2 September 2009

  23. Ginnosar T (2008) Online participation: a content analysis of differences in utilization of two online cancer communities by men and women, patients and family members. Health Commun 23:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Given BA, Given CW, Kozachick S (2001) Family support in advanced cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 51:213–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gorini A, Gagglioli A, Vigna C, Riva G (2008) A second life for eHealth: prospects of the use of 3-D virtual worlds in clinical psychology. J Med Internet Res 10:e21 (http//www.jmir.org/2008/3/e21/ doi:10.2196/jmir.1029)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Glajchen M (2004) The emerging role and needs of family caregivers in cancer care. J Support Oncol 2:145–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg E, Pingree S, Serlin RE, Graziano F (1999) Impact of patient-centred, computer based health information/support system. Am J Prev Med 16:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Pingree S, Mc Tavish F, Arora NK, Medenhall J, Cella DF, Serlin RC, Apantaku FM, Stewart J, Salner A (2001) Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med 16:435–445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hansen MM (2008) Versatile, immersive, creative and dynamic virtual 3-D healthcare learning environments: a review of the literature. J Med Internet Res 10:e26 (http//www.jmir.org/2008/3/e26/ doi:10.2196/jmir.1051)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Helft R, Eckles R, Johnson-Calley C, Daugherty C (2005) Use of the Internet to obtain cancer information among cancer patients at an urban county hospital. J Clin Oncol 23:4954–4962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. James N, Daniels H, Rahman R, McConkey C, Derry J, Young A (2007) A study of information seeking by cancer patients and their carers. Clin Oncol 19:356–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jefford M, Black C, Grogan S, Yeoman G, White V, Akkerman D (2005) Information and support needs of callers to the cancer helpline, The Cancer Council Victoria. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 14:113–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim Y, Kashy DA, Spillers RL, Evans TV (2009) Needs assessments of family caregivers of cancer survivors: three cohorts comparison. Psychooncology. doi:10.1002/pon.1597

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kirschning S, von Kardorff E, Merai K (2007) Internet use by the families of cancer patients—help for disease management? J Public Health (Bangkok) 15:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Klemm P, Bunnell D, Cullen M, Soneji R, Gibbons P, Holecek A (2003) Online cancer support groups. Comput Inform Nurs 21:136–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Klemm P, Wheeler E (2005) Cancer caregivers online. Hope, emotional roller coaster, and physical/emotional/psychological responses. Comput Inform Nurs 23:38–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lieberman MA, Golant M, Giese-Davis J, Winzlenberg A, Benjamin H, Humphreys K, Kronenwetter C, Russo S, Spiegel D (2003) Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma. Cancer 97:920–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lopez-Gomez M, Feliu J, Sereno M, Gomez-Raposo C, Casado-Saenz E (2008) Internet use for medical research among cancer patients and their relatives in Spain. Ann Oncol 19:1976–1977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Monnier J, Laken M, Carter C (2002) Patient and caregiver interest in Internet-based cancer services. Cancer Pract 10:305–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Morris SM, Thomas C (2001) The carer’s place in the cancer situation: where does the carer stand in the medical setting? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 10:87–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Morris SM, Thomas C (2002) The need to know; informal carers and information’. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 11:183–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. NHMRC (2003) Clinical practice guidelines for the psycho-social care of adults with cancer. National Breast Cancer Centre, NSW

  44. Newnham G, Burns W, Snyder R, Dowling A, Ranieri N, Gray E, McLachlan S-A (2006) Information from the Internet: attitudes of Australian oncology patients. J Intern Med 36:718–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Pecchioni L, Sparks L (2007) Health information sources of individuals with cancer and their family members. Health Commun 21:143–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Reis J, McGinty B, Jones S (2003) An e-learning care giving program for prostate cancer patients and family members. J Med Syst 27:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rutten LJ, Squiers L, Trieman K (2006) Requests for information by family and friends of cancer patients calling the national cancer institutes cancer information service. Psychooncology 15:664–672. doi:10.1002/pon.995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schultz P, Stava C, Beck M, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R (2003) Internet message board use by patients with cancer and their families. Clin J Oncol Nurs 7:663–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Seale C (2006) Gender accommodation in online cancer support groups. Health 10:345–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shaw BR, Han JY, Baker T, Witherly J, Hawkins RP, McTavish F, Gustafson DH (2007) How women with breast cancer learn using interactive cancer communication systems. Health Educ Res 22:108–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Simon C, Schramm S (2008) Cancer and the computerized family: towards a clinical ethics of ‘indirect’ Internet use. Med Health Care Philos 11:337–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Soothill K, Morris SM, Harman JC, Francis B, Thomas C, McIllmurray MB (2001) Informal carers of cancer patients: what are their unmet psychosocial needs? Health Soc Care Community 9:464–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Thomas C, Morris SM (2002) Informal carers in cancer contexts. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 11:178–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. van Uden-Kraan C, Drossart CHC, Taal E, Seydel ER, van der Laar MAFJ (2008) Self-reported differences in empowerment between lurkers and posters in online patient support groups. J Med Internet Res 10:e18. doi:10.2196/jmir.992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Walther JB, Pingree S, Hawkins RP, Buller DB (2005) Attributes of interactive online health information systems. J Med Internet Res 7:e33 (http//www.jmir.org/2005/7/e33/ doi:10.2196/jmir.7.3.e33)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L (2004) How the Internet affects patient’s experience of cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ 328:564–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett Street, Victoria, 8006, Australia

    Nicole A. Kinnane & Donna J. Milne

Authors
  1. Nicole A. Kinnane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donna J. Milne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole A. Kinnane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kinnane, N.A., Milne, D.J. The role of the Internet in supporting and informing carers of people with cancer: a literature review. Support Care Cancer 18, 1123–1136 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0863-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0863-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation