Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation-based training improves applied clinical placement of ultrasound-guided PICCs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Skilled placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) has a profound impact on patient well-being and costs of care. The use of ultrasound-guided methods and prescribed training for cannulation skills are evidence-based practice recommendations. The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of PICC instruction on the acquisition of applied skills.

Methods

Residents were randomly assigned to one of two groups (N = 16/16) of this blind-rater study and were trained to perform ultrasound-guided PICC cannulation using either simulation or apprenticeship methods. All residents were assessed placing a PICC in applied clinical patient care.

Results

Residents who completed simulation training had significantly better transfer of skills to applied clinical practice than residents who received apprenticeship training, having better performance ratings on eight of nine procedure-specific task measures (p < 0.05) and higher success rates in endpoint PICC placement.

Conclusions

These results support the use of prescribed simulation-based training for the acquisition of requisite skills associated with PICC placement and expand on similar studies that suggest the advantages of simulation-based training for central line placement. Additionally, the data suggest that training using a single simulation model may support the acquisition of both central venous catheterization and PICC skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrews JC, Marx MV, Williams DM, Sproat I, Walker-Andrews SC (1992) The upper arm approach for placement of peripherally inserted central catheters for protracted venous access. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:427–429

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blaivas M, Adhikari S (2009) An unseen danger: frequency of posterior vessel wall penetration by needles during attempts to place internal jugular vein central catheters using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med 37:2345–2349, quiz 2359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brannam L, Blaivas M, Lyon M, Flake M (2004) Emergency nurses’ utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients. Acad Emerg Med 11:1361–1363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Britt RC, Novosel TJ, Britt LD, Sullivan M (2009) The impact of central line simulation before the ICU experience. Am J Surg 197:533–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Denys BG, Uretsky BF, Reddy PS (1993) Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique. Circulation 87:1557–1562

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Doniger SJ, Ishimine P, Fox JC, Kanegaye JT (2009) Randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement versus traditional techniques in difficult-access pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care 25:154–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feller-Kopman D (2007) Ultrasound-guided internal jugular access: a proposed standardized approach and implications for training and practice. Chest 132:302–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallieni M, Pittiruti M, Biffi R (2008) Vascular access in oncology patients. CA Cancer J Clin 58:323–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krathwohl D (1998) Methods of educational and social science research: an integrated approach, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leung J, Duffy M, Finckh A (2006) Real-time ultrasonographically-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in the emergency department increases success rates and reduces complications: a randomized, prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 48:540–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lyon SM, Given M, Marshall NL (2008) Interventional radiology in the provision and maintenance of long-term central venous access. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 52:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McBride KD, Fisher R, Warnock N, Winfield DA, Reed MW, Gaines PA (1997) A comparative analysis of radiological and surgical placement of central venous catheters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20:17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Milling T, Holden C, Melniker L, Briggs WM, Birkhahn R, Gaeta T (2006) Randomized controlled trial of single-operator vs. two-operator ultrasound guidance for internal jugular central venous cannulation. Acad Emerg Med 13:245–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paulson PR, Miller KM (2008) Neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters: recommendations for prevention of insertion and postinsertion complications. Neonatal Netw 27:245–257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramakrishna G, Higano ST, McDonald FS, Schultz HJ (2005) A curricular initiative for internal medicine residents to enhance proficiency in internal jugular central venous line placement. Mayo Clin Proc 80:212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith J (2009) Regarding "Arterial trauma during central venous catheter insertion: case series, review, and proposed algorithm". J Vasc Surg 49:1363, discussion 1363–1364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela Andreatta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andreatta, P., Chen, Y., Marsh, M. et al. Simulation-based training improves applied clinical placement of ultrasound-guided PICCs. Support Care Cancer 19, 539–543 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0849-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0849-2

Keywords

Navigation