Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A rehabilitation program for patients with gastroesophageal cancer—a pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Gastroesophageal carcinoma has a 5-year survival rate of 20%. Esophagogastrectomy is a significant life-altering operation which interferes with a patient’s ability to eat food as a normal social interaction. Dumping syndrome, delayed gastric emptying, and reflux are encountered after surgery. In addition, loss of appetite and body weight occurs. Fatigue is universally encountered. We conducted this study to evaluate whether a structured cancer nutrition and rehabilitation program has an effect on the symptoms and quality of life of patients with gastroesophageal cancer.

Materials and methods

Fifty-three patients with histologically documented gastroesophageal carcinoma were evaluated before and after an 8-week multidisciplinary program consisting of physicians, oncology nurse, dietitian, physical and occupational therapists, social worker, and psychologist. Twenty-two patients completed all the following questionnaires pre- and post-program: The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), and the Distress Thermometer.

Result

There were 42 male and 11 female patients. The median age was 63 years (22–80 years). Thirty patients had gastric cancer and 23 had esophageal cancer. On the ESAS, appetite, strength, shortness of breath, and constipation all improved (p = 0.01). The PG-SGA score decreased significantly (p = 0.05). Fatigue and general activity as measured on the BFI improved significantly. The 6-min walk increased from 384 to 435 m (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

The Cancer Nutrition and Rehabilitation program offers a multidimensional, holistic treatment approach emphasizing the patient as an individual. Participation in a cancer rehabilitation program ameliorates symptoms, improves nutrition, decreases global distress, and increases physical activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wright TA (1997) High-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Br J Surg 84:760–766. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800840606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaheen N, Ransohoff DF (2002) Gastroesophageal reflux, Barrett esophagus, and esophageal cancer: scientific review. JAMA 287(15):1972–1981. doi:10.1001/jama.287.15.1972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada: Canadian Cancer Statistics 2008, Toronto, Canada, 2008. April 2008, ISSN 0835-2976

  4. American Cancer Society Cancer Facts and Figures 2008. Atlanta, Georgia: American Cancer Society; 2008

  5. Daly JM, Fry WA, Little AG et al (2000) Esophageal cancer: results of an American college of surgeons patient care evaluation study. J Am Coll Surg 190:562–572. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00238-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P et al (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited resection for adenocanrcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347(21):1662–1669. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa022343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bosset JF, Mercier M, Triboulet JP, Conroy T, Seitz JF (2002) Surgical resection with or without chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. Lancet 360(9340):1173–1174. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11218-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Casson AG, van Lanschot JJ (2005) Improving outcomes after esophagectomy: the impact of operative volume. J Surg Oncol 92:262–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donavan JL, Alderson D (2000) A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer 88:1781–1787. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000415)88:8<1781::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-G

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bury M (1982) Chronic Illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness 4:167–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Olson K, Turner AR, Courneya KS, Field C, Man G, Cree M, Hanson J (2008) Possible links between behavioral and physiological indices of tiredness, fatigue, and exhaustion in advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 16:241–249. doi:10.1007/s00520-007-0298-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ottery F (2000) (2000) Patient-generated subjective global assessment. In: Polisena C (ed) The clinical guide to oncology nutrition. American Dietetic Association, Chicago, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Cleeland CS et al (1999) The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer 85:1186–1196. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990301)85:5<1186::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO;2-N

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2003) Distress management clinical practice guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 1:344–374

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wright DJ, Khan KM, Gossage EM, Saltissi S (2001) Assessment of a low-intensity cardiac rehabilitation programme using the six-minute walk test. Clin Rehabil 15:119. doi:10.1191/026921501671364449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Simmonds MJ (2002) Physical function in patients with cancer: psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of a physical performance test battery. J Pain Symptom Manage 24:404–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee J, Park S, Kim S et al (2004) A single institutional phase III trial of preoperative chemotherapy with hyperfractionation radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 15:947–954. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vecht J, Winter M, Chang PC, Lamers CBHW (1996) Acute vasodilatation in early dumping syndrome [abstract]. Gastroenterology 110:A329

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miholic J, Orskov C, Holst JJ et al (1991) Emptying of the gastric substitute, glucogon-like peptide (GLP-1) and reactive hypoglycemia after total gastrectomy. Dig Dis Sci 36:1361–1370. doi:10.1007/BF01296800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gerald Bronfman Centre for Clinical Research in Oncology, McGill University, 546 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC, H2W 1S6, Canada

    Martin Robert Chasen & Ravi Bhargava

Authors
  1. Martin Robert Chasen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravi Bhargava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Robert Chasen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chasen, M.R., Bhargava, R. A rehabilitation program for patients with gastroesophageal cancer—a pilot study. Support Care Cancer 18 (Suppl 2), 35–40 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0828-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0828-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation