Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Resident preparedness in discussing prognosis in patients with advanced lung cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals

Teaching delivery of bad news is part of the standard medical school curriculum. Lung cancer is a common disease with poor outcomes; therefore, “poor prognosis” discussions occur frequently. Trainee preparedness to conduct these has not been studied well to date. We surveyed residents treating lung cancer in Ontario, assessing preparedness to discuss a poor prognosis.

Methods

A 17-question survey was distributed to residents in medical oncology, palliative care, radiation oncology, respirology, and thoracic surgery. The survey questioned demographics, prior communication skills training, lung cancer knowledge, comfort in discussing a poor prognosis, and preferred approach to these consultations.

Results

Of 153 surveys distributed, 46% were completed. Most residents (68%) were Canadian trained and 70% were in the second-half of training. Lung cancer knowledge scores appear to be related to specialty (p = 0.016); medical oncology residents scored higher (mean score 2.7/4) than other specialties (range 0–1.9). Comfort in discussing prognosis increased with years of training (p < 0.0001). Observation of attending physicians was the preferred learning method (58%, p < 0.0001). Similar numbers of residents preferred an optimistic or realistic approach in a poor prognosis consultation (49% versus 45%). Lung cancer knowledge, training location, specialty, age, gender, and level of comfort or preparedness in discussing bad news did not influence the approach taken by residents in a scenario of discussing a poor prognosis.

Conclusion

Comfort in discussing bad news improves with time. Residents rate observation the most useful tool in learning this skill. Efforts to enhance preparedness should include resident attendance and involvement in these consultations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55(2):74–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Cancer Society (2007) Global Cancer Facts and Figures 2007. http://wwwcancerorg/downloads/STT/Global_Cancer_Facts_and_Figures_2007_revpdf.

  3. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, Pereira JR, De Marinis F, von Pawel J, Gatzemeier U, Tsao TC, Pless M, Muller T et al (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22(9):1589–1597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly K, Crowley J, Bunn PA Jr, Presant CA, Grevstad PK, Moinpour CM, Ramsey SD, Wozniak AJ, Weiss GR, Moore DF et al (2001) Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol 19(13):3210–3218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, Zhu J, Johnson DH (2002) Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 346(2):92–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Butow PN, Kazemi JN, Beeney LJ, Griffin AM, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH (1996) When the diagnosis is cancer: patient communication experiences and preferences. Cancer 77(12):2630–2637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH, Boyer MJ (1997) The dynamics of change: cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 8(9):857–863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lobb EA, Kenny DT, Butow PN, Tattersall MH (2001) Women's preferences for discussion of prognosis in early breast cancer. Health Expect 4(1):48–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meredith C, Symonds P, Webster L, Lamont D, Pyper E, Gillis CR, Fallowfield L (1996) Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views. BMJ 313(7059):724–726

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schofield PE, Beeney LJ, Thompson JF, Butow PN, Tattersall MH, Dunn SM (2001) Hearing the bad news of a cancer diagnosis: the Australian melanoma patient's perspective. Ann Oncol 12(3):365–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplowitz SA, Campo S, Chiu WT (2002) Cancer patients' desires for communication of prognosis information. Health Commun 14(2):221–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lobb EA, Butow PN, Kenny DT, Tattersall MH (1999) Communicating prognosis in early breast cancer: do women understand the language used? Med J Aust 171(6):290–294

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Butow PN, Dowsett S, Hagerty R, Tattersall MH (2002) Communicating prognosis to patients with metastatic disease: what do they really want to know? Support Care Cancer 10(2):161–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PM, Lobb EA, Pendlebury SC, Leighl N, MacLeod C, Tattersall MH (2005) Communicating with realism and hope: incurable cancer patients' views on the disclosure of prognosis. J Clin Oncol 23(6):1278–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sapir R, Catane R, Kaufman B, Isacson R, Segal A, Wein S, Cherny NI (2000) Cancer patient expectations of and communication with oncologists and oncology nurses: the experience of an integrated oncology and palliative care service. Support Care Cancer 8(6):458–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PM, Dimitry S, Tattersall MH (2005) Communicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Oncol 16(7):1005–1053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderlik MR, Pentz RD, Hess KR (2000) Revisiting the truth-telling debate: a study of disclosure practices at a major cancer center. J Clin Ethics 11(3):251–259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baile WF, Lenzi R, Parker PA, Buckman R, Cohen L (2002) Oncologists' attitudes toward and practices in giving bad news: an exploratory study. J Clin Oncol 20(8):2189–2196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gordon EJ, Daugherty CK (2003) ‘Hitting you over the head’: oncologists' disclosure of prognosis to advanced cancer patients. Bioethics 17(2):142–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Christakis NA, Lamont EB (2000) Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study. BMJ 320(7233):469–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Glare P, Virik K, Jones M, Hudson M, Eychmuller S, Simes J, Christakis N (2003) A systematic review of physicians' survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BMJ 327(7408):195–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gattellari M, Voigt KJ, Butow PN, Tattersall MH (2002) When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions? J Clin Oncol 20(2):503–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Back AL, Arnold RM (2006) Discussing prognosis: “how much do you want to know?” talking to patients who do not want information or who are ambivalent. J Clin Oncol 24(25):4214–4217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Back AL, Arnold RM (2006) Discussing prognosis: “how much do you want to know?” talking to patients who are prepared for explicit information. J Clin Oncol 24(25):4209–4213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP (2000) SPIKES—a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 5(4):302–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Parkes CM (1972) Accuracy of predictions of survival in later stages of cancer. Br Med J 2(5804):29–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Greisinger AJ, Lorimor RJ, Aday LA, Winn RJ, Baile WF (1997) Terminally ill cancer patients. Their most important concerns. Cancer Pract 5(3):147–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Merriman L, Perez DJ, McGee R, Campbell AV (1997) Receiving a diagnosis of cancer: the perceptions of patients. N Z Med J 110(1049):297–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brogger J, Nystad W, Cappelen I, Bakke P (2007) No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial. J Med Internet Res 9(5):e40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharp L, Cochran C, Cotton SC, Gray NM, Gallagher ME (2006) Enclosing a pen with a postal questionnaire can significantly increase the response rate. J Clin Epidemiol 59(7):747–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor KS, Counsell CE, Harris CE, Gordon JC, Fonseca SC, Lee AJ (2006) In a randomized study of envelope and ink color, colored ink was found to increase the response rate to a postal questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 59(12):1326–1330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wensing M, Schattenberg G (2005) Initial nonresponders had an increased response rate after repeated questionnaire mailings. J Clin Epidemiol 58(9):959–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the program directors and residents from each training program in Ontario for contributing to this survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital/University Health Network, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G 2M9

    Paul Wheatley-Price, Christine Massey, Tony Panzarella & Frances A. Shepherd

  2. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Tony Panzarella

  3. Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA

    Joseph Mikhael

Authors
  1. Paul Wheatley-Price
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine Massey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tony Panzarella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frances A. Shepherd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joseph Mikhael
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Wheatley-Price.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wheatley-Price, P., Massey, C., Panzarella, T. et al. Resident preparedness in discussing prognosis in patients with advanced lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 18, 491–497 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0702-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0702-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation