Skip to main content
Log in

An exploratory study on the Italian patients’ preferences regarding how they would like to be told about their cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goal

Major cross-cultural differences in truth-telling attitudes and practices have been demonstrated. Until recently, in Italy the doctor could conceal both diagnosis and prognosis to seriously ill patients out of beneficence. Signs of change have been reported, but the extent and way patients would be informed is still unknown. The aim of the study was to assess Italian patients’ preferences regarding how they would like to be told about their cancer and its treatment. We examined the factor structure of the Measure of Patients’ Preferences—Italian version (MPP-It) and whether demographical and medical variables were associated with the dimensions of patients’ preferences.

Materials and methods

Patients were invited to participate during a visit to the oncology department of the Lecco hospital (Italy) for chemotherapy or follow-up. An Italian version of the MPP-It was administered. Data were analyzed through a factor analysis.

Main results

A total of 210 cancer patients agreed to participate. Three main factors were identified: (1) Information (Talking About the Disease). Items in this factor were concerned with the dialogue about the disease and treatment options; (2) Support (The Emotional World of the Patient). These items referred to the supportive and relational aspects of the physician–patient encounter; (3) Care (The Ideal Doctor). These items related to the patients’ desires about the doctor’s personal attributes.

Conclusions

The first two factors, information and support, were comparable to those of similar American and Asian studies. The study suggests a cross-cultural uniformity among cancer patients who appreciate the informative and clearness of the communication aspects as being primarily important, while also giving high points to relationship aspects. The third factor appears unique to the Italian context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderlik MR, Pentz RD, Hess KR (2000) Revisiting the truth-telling debate: a study of disclosure practices at a major cancer center. J Clin Ethics 11:251–259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cavanna L, Anselmi E, Lazzaro A, Seghini P, Di Nunzio C, Dallanegra L, Monfredo M (2007) Cancer diagnosis disclosure in a northern Italian hospital. Report on 312 consecutive cancer patients. Tumori 93:290–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiu L-Q, Lee W-S, Gao F, Parker PA, Ng G-Y, Toh C-K (2006) Cancer patients’ preferences for communication of unfavourable news: an Asian perspective. Support Care Cancer 14:818–824. doi:10.1007/s00520-005-0911-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Costantini M, Marasso G, Montella M, Borgia P, Cecioni R, Beccaro M, Sguazzotti E, Bruzzi P (2006) Diagnosis and prognosis disclosure among cancer patients. Results from an Italian mortality follow-back survey. Ann Oncol 17:853–859. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Lorenzo F, Ballatori E, Di Costanzo F, Giacalone A, Ruggeri B, Tirelli U (2004) Improving information to Italian cancer patients: results of a randomized study. Ann Oncol 15:721–725. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fallowfield L (1996) Things to consider when teaching doctors how to deliver good, bad and sad news. Med Teach 18:27–30. doi:10.3109/01421599609040258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fontanesi S, Goss C, Rimondini M (2007) How to involve patients in the decision making process. Recenti Prog Med 98:611–618

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujimori M, Akechi T, Morita T, Inagaki M, Azikuki N, Sakano Y, Uchitomi Y (2007) Preferences of cancer patients regarding the disclosure of bad news. Psychooncology 16:573–581. doi:10.1002/pon.1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grassi L, Girali T, Messina EG, Magnani K, Valle E, Cartei G (2000) Physicians’ attitudes to and problems with truth-telling to cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 8:40–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. The Italian Group for the Evaluation of Outcomes in Oncology (IGEO) (1999) Awareness of disease among Italian cancer patients: Is there a need for further improvement in patient information? Ann Oncol 10:1095–1100. doi:10.1023/A:1017278918524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kusec S, Oreskovic S, Skegro M, Korolija D, Busic Z, Horzic M (2006) Improving comprehension of informed consent. Patient Educ Couns 60:294–300. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lamiani G, Meyer EC, Rider EA, Browning DM, Vegni E, Mauri E, Moja EA, Truog RD (2008) Assumptions and blind spots in patient-centeredness: action research between American and Italian healthcare professionals. Med Educ 42:712–720. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03038.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mobeireek AF, Al-Kassimi F, Al-Zahrani K, Al-Shimemeri A, Al-Damegh S, Al-Amoudi O, Al-Eithan S, Al-Ghamdi B, Gamal-Eldin M (2008) Information disclosure and decision-making: the Middle East versus the Far East and the West. J Med Ethics 34:225–229. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Novack DH, Plumer R, Smith RL, Ochitill H, Morrow GR, Bennett JM (1979) Changes in physicians’ attitudes toward telling the cancer patient. JAMA 241:897–900. doi:10.1001/jama.241.9.897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parker PA, Baile WF, de Moor C, Lenzi R, Kudelka AP, Cohen L (2001) Breaking bad news about cancer: patients’ preferences for communication. J Clin Oncol 19:2049–2056

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ptacek JT, Fries EA, Eberhardt TL, Ptacek JJ (1999) Breaking bad news to patients: physicians’ perceptions of the process. Support Care Cancer 7:113–120. doi:10.1007/s005200050240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Searight HR, Gafford J (2005) Cultural diversity at the end of life: issues and guidelines for family physicians. Am Fam Physician 71:515–522

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sokol DK (2006) How the doctor’s nose has shortened over time; a historical overview of the truth-telling debate in the doctor–patient relationship. J R Soc Med 99:632–636. doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.12.632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Surbone A (1992) Truth telling to the patient. JAMA 268:1661–1663. doi:10.1001/jama.268.13.1661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Surbone A (2006) Telling the truth to patients with cancer: what is the truth? Lancet Oncol 7:944–950. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70941-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Surbone A (2008) Cultural aspects of communication in cancer care. Support Care Cancer 16:235–240. doi:10.1007/s00520-007-0366-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Surbone A, Ritossa C, Spagnolo AG (2004) Evolution of truth-telling attitudes and practices in Italy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 52:165–172. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vincent JL (1998) Information in the ICU: are we being honest with our patients? The results of a European questionnaire. Intensive Care Med 24:1251–1256. doi:10.1007/s001340050758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Whitney SN, McCullough LB (2007) Physicians’ silent decisions: because patient autonomy does not always come first. Am J Bioeth 7:33–38. doi:10.1080/15265160701399735

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the medical and nursing staff of the Department of Oncology of the Hospital in Lecco, Italy, and in particular the head physician, Dr. G. Ucci. We thank Drs. Francesca Pistarini and Alessandro Gabetta for their input and hard work on this project. We thank Dr. Cristina Nova for her participation on the research. We also thank scientific editors Kathryn Carnes and Sue Moreau from The Office of Scientific Publications at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center for their help with this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuela Mauri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mauri, E., Vegni, E., Lozza, E. et al. An exploratory study on the Italian patients’ preferences regarding how they would like to be told about their cancer. Support Care Cancer 17, 1523–1530 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0621-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0621-7

Keywords

Navigation