Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Depression in lung cancer patients: is the HADS an effective screening tool?

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The present study aimed at comparing the efficacy in recognizing depression, in 53 patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer, of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a self-report screening questionnaire, and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), a semi-structured clinician-rated interview. Specifically, we aimed at addressing the question of which is the best HADS cutoff for the detection of patients to be further investigated through a clinical semi-structured interview (the MADRS).

Results

The MADRS identified 92% of the patients as depressed; the HADS, 70% and 87%, using a cutoff of 11 and 8, respectively. The results suggest substantial agreement between the HADS and the MADRS when a cutoff of 8 is used (McNemar: p = 0.51; Cohen K = 0.69), while a HADS cutoff of 11 resulted in a significantly lower concordance with the MADRS (McNemar: p = 0.002; Cohen K = 0.49).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ballenger JC, Davidson JR, Lecrubier Y et al (2001) Consensus statement on depression, anxiety and oncology. J Clin Psychiatry 62:64–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berard RMF, Boermeester F, Viljoen G (1998) Depressive disorders in an out-patient oncology setting: prevalence, assessment, and management. Psychooncology 7:112–120. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1099-1611(199803/04)7:2<112::AID-PON300>3.0.CO;2-W

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D (2002) The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52:69–77. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bulli F, Miccinesi G, Maruelli A, Katz M, Paci E (2008) The measure of psychological distress in cancer patients: the use of Distress Thermometer in the Oncological Rehabilitation Center of Florence. Support Care Cancer. doi:10.1007/s00520-008-0543-9

  5. Costantini M, Musso M, Viterbori P, Bonci F, Del Mastro L, Garrone O, Venturini M, Morasso G (1999) Detecting psychological distress in cancer patients: validity of the Italian version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Support Care Cancer 7(3):121–127. doi:10.1007/s005200050241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hopwood P, Stephens RJ (2000) Depression in patients with lung cancer: prevalence and risk factors derived from quality-of-life data. J Clin Oncol 18(4):893–903

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnston M, Pollard B, Hennessey P (2000) Construct validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale with clinical populations. J Psychosom Res 48(6):579–584. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(00)00102-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kearns NP, Cruickshank CA, McGuigan KJ, Riley SA, Shaw SP, Snaith RP (1982) A comparison of depression rating scales. Br J Psychiatry 141:45–49. doi:10.1192/bjp.141.1.45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Landis JR, Koch GG (1997) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lloyd-Williams M, Freidman T, Rudd N (2000) Criterion validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale as a screening tool for depression in patients with advanced metastatic cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 20:259–265. doi:10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00182-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Massie MJ (2004) Prevalence of depression in patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 32:57–71. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Massie MJ, Popkin MK (1998) Depressive disorders. In: Holland JC (ed) Psycho-oncology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 518–540

    Google Scholar 

  13. Montgomery SA, Asberg M (1979) A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 134:382–389. doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Muller MJ, Himmerich H, Kienzle B et al (2003) Differentiating moderate and severe depression using the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS). J Affect Disord 77:255–260. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00120-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Néron S, Correa JA, Dajczman E, Kasymjanova G, Kreisman H, Small D (2007) Screening for depressive symptoms in patients with unresectable lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 15:1207–1212. doi:10.1007/s00520-007-0225-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pignone MP, Gaynes BN, Rushton JL, Burchell CM, Orleans CT, Mulrow CD, Lohr KN (2000) Screening for depression in adults: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 136(10):765–776

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reich M (2008) Depression and cancer: recent data on clinical issues, research challenges and treatment approaches. Curr Opin Oncol 20(4):353–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Uchitomi Y, Mikami I, Kugaya A, Akizuki N, Nagai K, Nishiwaki Y, Akechi T, Okamura H (2000) Depression after successful treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer 89:1172–1179. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20000901)89:5<1172::AID-CNCR27>3.0.CO;2-U

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Walker J, Postma K, McHugh GS, Rush R, Coyle B, Strong V, Sharpe M (2007) Performance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening tool for major depressive disorder in cancer patients. J Psychosom Res 63(1):83–91. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.01.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmerman M, Posternak MA, Chelminski I (2004) Implications of using different cut-offs on symptom severity scales to define remission from depression. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 19(4):215–220. doi:10.1097/01.yic.0000130232.57629.46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zimmerman M, Posternak MA, Chelminski I (2004) Derivation of a definition of remission on the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale corresponding to the definition of remission on the Hamilton rating scale for depression. J Psychiatr Res 38(6):577–582. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.03.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Torta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castelli, L., Binaschi, L., Caldera, P. et al. Depression in lung cancer patients: is the HADS an effective screening tool?. Support Care Cancer 17, 1129–1132 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0604-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0604-8

Keywords

Navigation