Abstract
Study objectives
To examine how outpatient cancer patients assess their cancer care in private oncology practices and day hospitals, and to identify the extent to which staff meet the expectations of their patients.
Setting
Private practices (n = 41) and day hospitals (n = 8) in Germany, including 16 “repeater” practices who had already participated in the 2002 Patient Satisfaction and Quality in Oncological Care (PASQOC)® survey.
Participants
n = 4,615 patients with cancer. Diagnoses: 25% breast cancer, 21% colorectal cancer, 12% haematologic malignancies, 11% lymphomas; mean age 63.5 years; 57% female; n = 1,639 patients from repeater practices.
Measurements
The 2004 PASQOC® questionnaire contained 63 problem-oriented items which covered 15 different dimensions of care. Practice staff invited their patients to participate and surveys were mailed to all sampled patients. For statistical analysis, the problem frequency (PF) was calculated for each item.
Results
Of 5,600 patients who received the questionnaire, 4,615 replied (response rate: 82%). The best results were obtained for the dimensions “further support in daily life” (3% PF), “nurses” (5% PF), and “physician-patient-relationship” (8% PF). Potential for improvement was most pronounced for “handling of side effects” (39% PF), “partnership and shared decision making” (30% PF), “side effects” (30% PF) and “communication with other patients” (26% PF). Considerable differences in PFs between practices were observed. Mean results from the 16 repeater practices revealed only few changes compared to the 2002 PASQOC® survey, although some practices had greatly improved their performance.
Conclusions
The PASQOC® questionnaire identified strengths and weaknesses of outpatient care for cancer patients. By providing a comparison with other practices, PASQOC® can help staff of individual practices to improve their performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chisholm A, Askham J (2006) What do you think of your doctor? A review of questionnaires for gathering patients’ feedback on their doctor. Picker Institute Europe, Oxford
Barlesi F, Chabert-Greillier L, Loundou A, Simeoni MC, Greillier L, Doddoli C et al (2006) Validation of the French version of the Princess Margaret hospital patient satisfaction with their doctor questionnaire. Rev Mal Respir 23(3 Pt 1):227–236
Vingerhoets E, Wensing M, Grol R (2001) Feedback of patients’ evaluations of general practice care: a randomised trial. Qual Health Care 10(4):224–228
Wensing M, Vingerhoets E, Grol R (2003) Feedback based on patient evaluations: a tool for quality improvement. Patient Educ Couns 51(2):149–153 Oct
Rao M, Clarke A, Sanderson C, Hammersley R (2006) Patients’ own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study. BMJ 1;333(7557):19
Cleary PD (2006) The increasing importance of patient surveys. Qual Saf Health Care 8(4):212
Sen S, Fawson P, Cherrington G, Douglas K, Friedman N, Maljanian R et al (2005) Patient satisfaction measurement in the disease management industry. Dis Manag 8(5):288–300
National Research Corporation (2003) Development and validation of the picker ambulatory Oncology Survey Instrument in Canada, Jul 11. National Research Corporation, Lincoln
Kleeberg UR, Tews JT, Ruprecht T, Hoing M, Kuhlmann A, Runge C (2005) Patient satisfaction and quality of life in cancer outpatients: results of the PASQOC study. Support Care Cancer 13(5):303–310
Coulter A (2006) Can patients assess the quality of health care. BMJ 1;333(7557):1–2
Gesell SB, Gregory N (2004) Identifying priority actions for improving patient satisfaction with outpatient cancer care. J Nurs Care Qual 19(3):226–233
Liekweg A, Eckhardt M, Taylor SC, Erdfelder E, Jaehde U (2005) Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient: satisfaction with information on cancer treatment. Pharm World Sci 27(2):96–103
Sandoval G, Brown AD, Sullivan T (2006) Factors that influence cancer patients’ overall perceptions of the quality of care. Int J Qual Health Care 18:226–274
Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V (1980) Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 92(6):832–836
Eide H, Graugaard P, Holgersen K, Finset A (2003) Physician communication in different phases of a consultation at an oncology outpatient clinic related to patient satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns 51(3):259–266
Kravitz RL (2001) Measuring patients’ expectations and requests. Ann Intern Med 1;134(9 Pt 2):881–888
Barr DA, Vergun P (2000) Using a new method of gathering patient satisfaction data to assess the effects of organizational factors on primary care quality. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 26(12):713–723
Bergenmar M, Nylen U, Lidbrink E, Bergh J, Brandberg Y (2006) Improvements in patient satisfaction at an outpatient clinic for patients with breast cancer. Acta Oncol 45(5):550–558
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to the participating study sites, the dedicated staff, Prof. Mühlig for validation of the questionnaire and in particular the participating patients and their relatives. We thank Prof. Dr. Gratiana Steinkamp, Hannover, who provided medical writing services on behalf of GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG, Munich, Germany. This study has been sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. PASQOC® is a trade mark of GlaxoSmithKline.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kleeberg, U.R., Feyer, P., Günther, W. et al. Patient satisfaction in outpatient cancer care: a prospective survey using The PASQOC® questionnaire. Support Care Cancer 16, 947–954 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0362-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0362-4