Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cancer and complementary medicine: an international perspective

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Boon H, Stewart M, Kennard MA, Gray R, Sawka C, Belle Brown J, McWilliam C, Gavin A, Baron RA, Aaron D, Haines-Kamka T (2000) Use of complementary/alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in Ontario: prevalence and perceptions. J Clin Oncol 18:2515–2521

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Corner J, Harewood J, Maslin-Prothero S, Lewith G, Maher EJ, Young T, Gwilliam C, Roffe L, Haviland J, Davies R (2006) A study of the use of complementary and alternative therapies among people undergoing cancer treatment: a quantitative and qualitative study. University of Southampton

  3. Eastwood HL (2000) Complementary therapies: the appeal to general practitioners. Med J Aust 173:95–98

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ernst E, Cassileth BR (1998) The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer—a systematic review. Cancer 83:777–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ersdal G, Ramstad S. (2006) How are European patients safeguarded when using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)? Jurisdiction, supervision and reimbursement status in the EEA area (EU and EFTA) and Switzerland. http://www.cam-cancer.org/mod_product/uploads/camcancer_legal_report_%28FINAL%29.pdf Accessed April 11, 2007

  6. Fønnebø V, Grimsgaard S, Walach H et al (2007) Researching complementary and alternative treatments—the gatekeepers are not at home. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Howie JGR, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ (1998) A comparison of the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract 15:165–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Launsø L, Drageset BJ, Fønnebø V, Jacobson JS, White JD, Salamonsen A, Horneber M, Egeland E (2006) Exceptional disease courses after the use of CAM: selection, registration, medical assessment, and research. An international perspective. J Altern Complement Med 12:607–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mercer SW (2002) Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pract 52:S9–S12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Molassiotis A, Fernadez-Ortega P, Pud D, Ozden G, Scott JA, Panteli V, Margulies A, Browall M, Magri M, Selvekerova S, Madsen E, Milovics L, Bruyns I, Gudmundsdottir G, Hummerston S, Ahmad AMA, Platin N, Kearney N, Patiraki E (2005) Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. Ann Oncol 16:655–663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagel G, Hoyer H, Katenkamp D (2004) Use of complementary and alternative medicine by patients with breast cancer: observations from a health-care survey. Support Care Cancer 12:789–796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Navo MA, Phan J, Vaughan C, Lynn Palmer J, Michaud L, Jones KL, Bodurka DC, Basen-Engquist K, Hortobagyi GN, Kavanagh JJ, Smith JA (2004) An assessment of the utilization of complementary and alternative medication in women with gynecologic or breast malignancies. J Clin Oncol 22:671–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paterson C, Britten N (2000) In pursuit of patient-centered outcomes: a qualitative evaluation of the Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile. J Health Serv Res Policy 5:27–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Paterson C, Thomas K, Manasse A, Cooke H, Peace G (2007) Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCaW): an individualised questionnaire for evaluating outcome in cancer support care that includes complementary therapies. Complement Ther Med 15:38–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rees L, Weil A (2001) Integrated medicine. BMJ 322:119–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Risberg T, Kolstad A, Bremnes Y, Holte H, Wist EA, Mella O, Klepp O, Wilsgaard T, Cassileth BR (2004) Knowledge of and attitudes toward complementary and alternative therapies: a national multicentre study of oncology professionals in Norway. Eur J Cancer 40:529–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Verhoef MJ, Balneaves LG, Boon HS, Vroegindewey A (2005) Reasons for and characteristics associated with complementary and alternative medicine use among adult cancer patients: a systematic review. Integr Cancer Ther 4:274–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Verhoef MJ, Vanderheyden LC, Dryden T, Mallory D, Ware M (2006) Evaluating complementary and alternative medicine interventions: in search of appropriate patient-centered outcome measures. BMC Complement Altern Med 6:38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Whole systems research in cancer care—report of meeting in Tromsø (Sommaroy), 14–16 September 2005. (2006) Complement Therap Med 14:157–164

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinjar Fønnebø.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fønnebø, V., Verhoef, M. & Paterson, C. Cancer and complementary medicine: an international perspective. Support Care Cancer 15, 999–1002 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0287-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0287-y

Keywords

Navigation