Abstract
Background
Complementary and alternative therapies (CATs) are increasingly being used by cancer patients. These patients often rely on information retrieved from the lay press, which can affect their choices towards unconventional treatments for their disease. In this study, we aimed at assessing UK newspapers’ coverage of CATs for cancer.
Methods
The “Lexis Nexis” database was searched for 3-month periods in 2002, 2003 and 2004. The search terms were combined: “complementary OR alternative AND medicine OR therapy AND cancer”. CATs were grouped and articles’ contents were assessed according to predefined criteria.
Results
A total of 310 articles were found: 117 came from national newspapers; 193 came from local newspaper issues. The UK press showed an increasing interest towards CATs for cancer (in 2002, 81 articles; in 2003, 82 articles and in 2004, 147 articles). The most frequently mentioned alternative therapies were diets and supplements (17.7%). Articles mainly focused on CATs as possible cancer treatments (44.8%), and 53.4% of all CATs mentioned were not backed up by trial data. The tone of the articles was generally positive towards CATs. Promotional articles increased over the years, especially for cancer centres and clinics.
Conclusion
UK national newspapers frequently publish articles on CATs for cancer. Much of this information seems to be uncritical with a potential for misleading patients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett C, Sterne J, Egger M (2002) What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers. BMJ 325:81–84
Ernst E (2000) Risks associated with complementary therapies. In: Dukes MNG, Aronson JK (eds) Meyler’s side effects of drugs, 14th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1649–1681
Grilli R, Freemantle N, Minozzi S, Domenighetti G, Finer D (2000) Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD000389
Moynihan R, Bero L, Ross-Degnan D, Henry D, Lee K, Watkins J, Mah C, Soumerai SB (2000) Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications. N Engl J Med 342:1645–1650
Cassileth BR (1996) Alternative and complementary cancer treatments. Oncologist 1:173–179
Scott JA, Kearney N, Hummerston S, Molassiotis A (2005) Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with cancer: a UK survey. Eur J Oncol Nurs 9:131–137
Ernst E (2003) Complementary therapies for cancer, more good than harm? Wien Klin Wochenschr 115:676–677
Ernst E, Weihmayr T (2000) UK and German media differ over complementary medicine. BMJ 321:707
Schmidt K, Ernst E (2004) Assessing websites on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer. Ann Oncol 15:733–742
Ernst E, Armstrong NC (1998) Lay books on complementary/alternative medicine: a risk factor for good health? Int J Risk Saf Med 11:209–215
Ernst E, Pittler MH, Stevinson C, White AR (2001) The desktop guide to complementary and alternative medicine. Mosby, Edinburgh
Ernst E (2003) Herb–drug interactions—an update. Perfusion 16:175–194
Coppes MJ, Anderson RA, Egeler RM, Wolff JEA (1998) Alternative therapies for the treatment of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med 339:846
Oneschuk D, Bruera E (1999) The potential dangers of complementary therapy use in a patient with cancer. J Palliat Care 15:49–52
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Milazzo, S., Ernst, E. Newspaper coverage of complementary and alternative therapies for cancer—UK 2002–2004. Support Care Cancer 14, 885–889 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0068-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0068-z