Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is a specific oncological scoring system better at predicting the prognosis of cancer patients admitted for an acute medical complication in an intensive care unit than general gravity scores?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of a specific oncologic scoring system—the ICU Cancer Mortality model (ICM)—in predicting hospital mortality in comparison to two general severity scores—the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II).

Patients and methods

All 247 patients admitted for a medical acute complication over an 18-month period in an oncological medical intensive care unit were prospectively registered. Their data, including type of complication, vital status at discharge and cancer characteristics as well as other variables necessary to calculate the three scoring systems were retrospectively assessed.

Results

Observed in-hospital mortality was 34%. The predicted in-hospital mortality rate for APACHE II was 32%; SAPS II, 24%; and ICM, 28%. The goodness of fit was inadequate except for the ICM score. Comparison of the area under the ROC curves revealed a better fit for ICM (area 0.79). The maximum correct classification rate was 72% for APACHE II, 74% for SAPS II and 77% for ICM. APACHE II and SAPS II were better at predicting outcome for survivors to hospital discharge, although ICM was better for non-survivors. Two variables were independently predicting the risk of death during hospitalisation: ICM (OR=2.31) and SAPS II (OR=1.05).

Conclusions

Gravity scores were the single independent predictors for hospital mortality, and ICM was equivalent to APACHE II and SAPS II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anonymous (1994) Second European Consensus Conference in Intensive Care: Predictory outcome in ICU patients. Réanimation-Urgences 3:141–234.

  2. Abbott RR, Setter M, Chan S, and Choi K (1991) APACHE II: Prediction of outcome of 451 ICU oncology admissions in a community hospital. Ann Oncol 2:571–574

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azoulay E, Moreau D, Alberti C, Leleu G, Adrie C, Barboteu M, Cottu P, Levy V, Le Gall J, Schlemmer B (2000) Predictors of short-term mortality in critically ill patients with solid malignancies. Intensive Care Med, 26:1817–1823

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blot F , Guignet M , Nitenberg G, Leclercq B, Gachot B, Escudier B(1997) Prognostic factors for neutropenic patients in an intensive care unit: respective roles of underlying malignancies and acute organ failures. Eur J Cancer 33:1031–1037

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boussat S, El’rini T, Dubiez A, Depierre A, Barale F, Capellier G (2000) Predictive factors of death in primary lung cancer patients on admission to the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 26:1811–1816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown M, Crede W (1995) Predictive ability of acute phisiology and chronic health evaluation II scoring applied to human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients. Crit care Med 23:848–853

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunet F, Lanore JJ, Dhainaut JF, Dreyfus F, Vaxelaire JF, Nouira S, Giraud T, Armaganidis A, Monsallier JF (1990) Is intensive care justified for patients with haematological malignancies? Intensive Care Med 16:291–297

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chu D (1993) Predicting survival in AIDS patients with respiratory failure. Application of the APACHE II scoring system. Crit Care Clin 9:89–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giangiuliani G, Gui D, Bonatti P, Tozzi P, Caracciolo F (1990) APACHE II in surgical lung carcinoma patients. Chest 98:627–630

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Groeger J, Lemeshow S, Price K, Nierman D, White P, Klar J, Granovsky S, Horak D, Kish S (1998) Multicenter outcome study of cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a probability of mortality model. J Clin Oncol 16:761–770

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haines IE, Zalcberg J, Buchanan JD (1990) Not for resuscitation orders in cancer patients-principles of decision making. Med J Aust 153:225–229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Headley J, Theriault R , Smith T (1992) Independent validation of APACHE II severity of illness score for predicting mortality in patients with breast cancer admitted to the intensive care unit. Cancer 70:497–503

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York

  15. Knaus W , Draper E , Wagner D, Zimmerman J (1985) APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit care Med 13:818–829

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Le Gall J, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW (1982) A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 115:92–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, Avrunin J, Gehlbach S, Rapoport J (1993) Mortality Probability Models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 270:2478–2486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pierpont G, Parenti C (1999) Physician risk assessment and APACHE scores in cardiac care units. Clin Cardiol 22:366–368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pittet D, Thievent B, Wenzel R, Li N, Gurman G, Suter P (1993) Importance of pre-existing co-morbidities for prognosis of septicemia in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 19:265–272

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sculier J, Paesmans M, Markiewicz E, Berghmans T (2000) Scoring systems in cancer patients admitted for an acute complication in a medical intensive care unit. Crit care Med 28:2786–2792

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith R, Levine S, Lewis M (1989) Prognosis of patients with AIDS requiring intensive care. Chest 96:857–861

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Staudinger T, Stoiser B, Müllner M, Locker GJ, Laczika K, Knapp S, Burgmann H, Wilfing A, Kofler J, Thalhammer F, Frass M (2000) Outcome and prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 28:1322–1328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Berghmans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berghmans, T., Paesmans, M. & Sculier, J.P. Is a specific oncological scoring system better at predicting the prognosis of cancer patients admitted for an acute medical complication in an intensive care unit than general gravity scores?. Support Care Cancer 12, 234–239 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-003-0580-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-003-0580-3

Keywords

Navigation