Skip to main content
Log in

Hamate hook nonunion initially mistaken for ulnar nerve compression: a case report with review of literature

  • case report
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Hamate hook (HH) stress fractures are rare, often presenting with misleading symptoms and easily overlooked/misdiagnosed. These fractures occur frequently in individuals participating in sports activities involving racquets, bats, or clubs. Symptoms are non-specific and often mimic other clinical conditions, such as ulnar nerve entrapment or ulnar vessel thrombosis.

Case report

A 17-year-old tennis player with no history of trauma presented with dominant hand weakness together with pain and paresthesia on the ulnar side, which exacerbated with tennis play. The patient was treated for ulnar nerve compression with activity cessation and rest for 2 months. After 6 months of persistent symptoms, the patient underwent open Guyon tunnel release, although preoperative electromyoneurography revealed no signs of nerve damage and bone scans showed a small area of increased uptake in the hypothenar region. Postoperatively, symptoms resumed and the patient reported to our department for a second opinion. Point tenderness over HH, hypothenar muscles hypotrophy, paresthesia, hand weakness and pain with ulnar deviation, and flexion of distal phalanges of the two ulnar fingers were observed. HH fracture was suspected. Computerized tomography scan revealed fractured HH and the patient underwent hook excision. One month postoperatively, the pain intensity reduced together with function and strength improvement; 2 months postoperatively, the patient was pain free and had returned to tennis.

Conclusions

In patients involved in racquet sports with hypothenar pain and paresthesia of the ulnar side of the hand, HH fracture should be suspected. Symptoms can mimic ulnar nerve entrapment and may lead to overlooking the correct diagnosis. Treatment of choice is fractured fragment excision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Court-Brown CM. The epidemiology of fractures and dislocations. In: Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, McQueen MM, Ricci WM, Tornetta P III, editors. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 8th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2015. pp. 59–108.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hirano K, Inoue G. Classification and treatment of hamate fractures. Hand Surg. 2005;10(2–3):151–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parker RD, Berkowitz MS, Brahms MA, Bohl WR. Hook of the hamate fractures in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14(6):517–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bachoura A, Wroblewski A, Jacoby SM, Osterman AL, Culp RW. Hook of hamate fractures in competitive baseball players. Hand (N Y). 2013;8(3):302–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Evans MW Jr. Hamate hook fracture in a 17-year-old golfer: importance of matching symptoms to clinical evidence. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27(8):516–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aldridge JM 3rd, Mallon WJ. Hook of the hamate fractures in competitive golfers: results of treatment by excision of the fractured hook of the hamate. Orthopedics. 2003;26(7):717–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Grady W, Hazle C. Persistent wrist pain in a mature golfer. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(4):425–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta A, Risitano G, Crawford R, Burke F. Fractures of the hook of the hamate. Injury. 1989;20(5):284–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Futami T, Aoki H, Tsukamoto Y. Fractures of the hook of the hamate in athletes. 8 cases followed for 6 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;64(4):469–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Foucher G, Schuind F, Merle M, Brunelli F. Fractures of the hook of the hamate. J Hand Surg Br. 1985;10(2):205–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Schrijver F, De Smet L. Fracture of the hook of the hamate, often misdiagnosed as “wrist sprain”. J Emerg Med. 2001;20(1):47–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stark HH, Jobe FW, Boyes JH, Ashworth CR. Fracture of the hook of the hamate in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59(5):575–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ploger MM, Kabir K, Friedrich MJ, Welle K, Burger C. Ulnar-sided wrist pain in sports: TFCC lesions and fractures of the hook of the hamate bone as uncommon diagnosis. Unfallchirurg. 2015;118(6):484–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sorensen AA, Howard D, Tan WH, Ketchersid J, Calfee RP. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(4):641–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Franchignoni F, Vercelli S, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Bravini E, Ferriero G. Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(1):30–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2(7889):1127–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Medical Research Council. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system, Memorandum no. 45. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guha AR, Marynissen H. Stress fracture of the hook of the hamate. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(3):224–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nisenfield FG, Neviaser RJ. Fracture of the hook of the hamate: a diagnosis easily missed. J Trauma. 1974;14(7):612–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shimizu H, Beppu M, Matsusita K. Clinical outcomes of hook of hamate fractures and usefulness of the hook of hamate pull test. Hand Surg. 2012;17(3):347–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wright TW, Moser MW, Sahajpal DT. Hook of hamate pull test. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(11):1887–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gill NW, Rendeiro DG. Hook of the hamate fracture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(5):325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Andresen R, Radmer S, Scheufler O, Adam C, Bogusch G. Optimization of conventional X‑ray images for the detection of hook of hamate fractures. Rontgenpraxis. 2006;56(2):59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Andresen R, Radmer S, Brossmann J, et al. The imaging of hamate fractures in the conventional X‑ray and CT: experimental results and clinical experiences. Rofo. 1998;169(1):53–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Demark RE Jr, Van Demark RE, Helsper E. Stress fracture of the hook of the hamate: a case report. S D Med. 2015;68(4):157–159,161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Whalen JL, Bishop AT, Linscheid RL. Nonoperative treatment of acute hamate hook fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 1992;17(3):507–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dermirkan F, Calandruccio JH, Diangelo D. Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon function after hamate hook excision. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(1):138–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. David TS, Zemel NP, Mathews PV. Symptomatic, partial union of the hook of the hamate fracture in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(1):106–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scheufler O, Andresen R, Radmer S, Erdmann D, Exner K, Germann G. Hook of hamate fractures: critical evaluation of different therapeutic procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(2):488–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Watson HK, Rogers WD. Nonunion of the hook of the hamate: an argument for bone grafting the nonunion. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14(3):486–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tomaru M, Osada D, Fujita S, Tamai K. Treatment of hook of the hamate fractures in adults using low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Hand Surg. 2014;19(3):433–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sakuma Y, Iwamoto T, Momohara S. Ununited fracture of the hook of hamate treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in an older middle-aged patient. Clin J Sport Med. 2014;24(4):358–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ahsoh K, Kondo M, Torisu T, Masumi S. The lateral approach compared with the volar approach for exposure of the hook of the hamate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;239:217–21.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tolat AR, Humphrey JA, McGovern PD, Compson J. Surgical excision of ununited hook of hamate fractures via the carpal tunnel approach. Injury. 2014;45(10):1554–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Devers BN, Douglas KC, Naik RD, Lee DH, Watson JT, Weikert DR. Outcomes of hook of hamate fracture excision in high-level amateur athletes. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(1):72–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Klausmeyer MA, Mudgal CS. Hook of hamate fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(12):2457–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not received grant support or research funding, and have no proprietary interest in the materials described in the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Bohacek MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M. Josipovic, D. Bozic, I. Bohacek, T. Smoljanovic and I. Bojanic declare that they have no competing interests.

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was obtained from patient for being included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Josipovic, M., Bozic, D., Bohacek, I. et al. Hamate hook nonunion initially mistaken for ulnar nerve compression: a case report with review of literature. Wien Klin Wochenschr 129, 136–140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-016-1114-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-016-1114-6

Keywords

Navigation