Skip to main content
Log in

War and peace? The oncologic and the palliative care perspective on personalized cancer treatment in a patient with advanced cancer

  • case report
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Personalized cancer treatment utilizing targeted therapies in a tailored approach is based on tumor and/or patient-specific molecular profiles. Recent clinical trials continue to look for new potential targets in heavily pretreated patients or rare disease entities. Careful selection of patients who may derive benefit from such therapies constitutes a challenge. This case report presents an experimental personalized cancer treatment in an advanced cancer patient and provides a list of issues for discussion: How can we combine treatment goals and simultaneously meet the individual needs in advanced cancer reconciling both perspectives: oncology and palliative care?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ng PC, Murray SS, Levy S, Venter JC. An agenda for personalized medicine. Nature. 2009;461(7265):724–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yanagihara Y, Tanji N, Miura N, Shirato A, Nishimura K, Fukumoto T, et al. Modified FOLFOX6 chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urachal cancer. Chemotherapy. 2013;59(6):402–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fojo T, Mailankody S, Lo A. Unintended consequences of expensive cancer therapeutics-the pursuit of marginal indications and a me-too mentality that stifles innovation and creativity: the John Conley Lecture. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;28(10):1225-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cassell EJ. Diagnosing suffering: a perspective. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(7):531–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oostendorp LJ, Ottevanger PB, van de Wouw AJ, Schoenaker IJ, de Graaf H, van der Graaf WT, et al. Expected survival with and without second-line palliative chemotherapy: who wants to know? Health Expect. 2014;10(10):12275.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jones JW, McCullough LB. Extending life or prolonging death: when is enough actually too much? J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(2):521–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weeks JC, Catalano PJ, Cronin A, Finkelman MD, Mack JW, Keating NL, et al. Patients’ expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(17):1616–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saunders C. The philosophy of terminal cancer care. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1987;16(1):151–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellershaw JE, Lakhani M. Best care for the dying patient. BMJ. 2013;347:f4428. doi:10.1136/bmj.f4428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strasser F, Blum D, Bueche D. Invasive palliative interventions: when are they worth it and when are they not? Cancer J. 2010;16(5):483–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Feinstein AR. Clinimetric perspectives. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):635–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Burki TK. End-of-life discussions are being left too late. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(3):e94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mack JW, Block SD, Nilsson M, Wright A, Trice E, Friedlander R, et al. Measuring therapeutic alliance between oncologists and patients with advanced cancer: the Human Connection Scale. Cancer. 2009;115(14):3302–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meier DE, Back AL, Morrison RS. The inner life of physicians and care of the seriously ill. JAMA. 2001;286(23):3007–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith TJ, Temin S, Alesi ER, Abernethy AP, Balboni TA, Basch EM, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: the integration of palliative care into standard oncology care. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(8):880–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ellis LM, Bernstein DS, Voest EE, Berlin JD, Sargent D, Cortazar P, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology perspective: raising the bar for clinical trials by defining clinically meaningful outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(12):1277–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cherny NI, de Vries EG, Emanuel L, Fallowfield L, Francis PA, Gabizon A, et al. Words matter: distinguishing “personalized medicine” and “biologically personalized therapeutics”. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014. doi:10.1093/jnci/dju321.

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no actual or potential conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva K. Masel MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masel, E., Schur, S., Posch, D. et al. War and peace? The oncologic and the palliative care perspective on personalized cancer treatment in a patient with advanced cancer. Wien Klin Wochenschr 127, 635–638 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0803-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0803-x

Keywords

Navigation