Skip to main content
Log in

Distal tibial fractures: evaluation of different fixation techniques

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Purpose

The purpose of this study was the comparison of the most commonly used surgical techniques (external fixation, intramedullary nailing, and plate fixation) for the treatment of distal tibial fractures (AO/OTA classification 42-A, B, C or 43-A, B1).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent surgical treatment for distal tibial fractures between 1992 and 2011 was performed.

Results

A total of 93 patients (52 male/41 female) met inclusion criteria. Statistically significant differences were found regarding the consolidation time of the intramedullary-nailing (147.32 ± 91.16 days) and the plate-fixation group (135.75 ± 110.75 days) versus the external-fixation group (163.12 ± 96.79 days; P = 0.001; P = 0.01). Significant differences were also observed in the range of motion (ROM) of the ankle joint in the intramedullary-nailing and plate-fixation group versus the ROM in the external-fixation group (P = 0.044; P = 0.025). The overall complication rate was 13/93 (14 %). Out of 66 patients treated with intramedullary nailing, 8 (12 %) suffered from complications. Out of the 15 patients treated with plate and 12 patients with external fixation, 2 (13 %) and 3 (25 %) showed complications, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate advantages in terms of shorter mobilization time and a better ROM of the ankle joint for intramedullary nailing and plate fixation compared with external fixation. Due to our results, we suggest internal fixation (intramedullary nailing or plate fixation) whenever patient’s condition and the local fracture situation allow it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sirkin M, Sanders R. The treatment of pilon fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32(1):91–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gao H, Zhang CQ, Luo CF, Zhou ZB, Zeng BF. Fractures of the distal tibia treated with polyaxial locking plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):831–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blauth M, Bastian L, Krettek C, Knop C, Evans S. Surgical options for the treatment of severe tibial pilon fractures: a study of three techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15(3):153–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Endres T, Grass R, Biewener A, Barthel S, Zwipp H. Advantages of minimally-invasive reposition, retention, and Ilizarov-(hybrid)fixation for pilon-tibial-fractures fractures with particular emphasis on C2/C3 fractures. Unfallchirurg. 2004;107(4):273–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang SW, Tzeng HM, Chou YJ, Teng HP, Liu HH, Wong CY. Treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures: plating versus shortened intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2006;37(6):531–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ristiniemi J, Luukinen P, Ohtonen P. Surgical treatment of extra-articular or simple intra-articular distal tibial fractures: external fixation versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(2):101–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duan X, Al-Qwbani M, Zeng Y, Zhang W, Xiang Z. Intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:CD008241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nork SE, Schwartz AK, Agel J, Holt SK, Schrick JL, Winquist RA. Intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1213–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Borg T, Larsson S, Lindsjo U. Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures. Preliminary results in 21 patients. Injury. 2004;35(6):608–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(Suppl. 1):v–ix, 1–154.

  11. Janssen KW, Biert J, van Kampen A. Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail: a retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. Int Orthop. 2007;31(5):709–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Patterson BM. Factors influencing functional outcomes after distal tibia shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(3):178–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deleanu B, Prejbeanu R, Poenaru D, Vermesan D, Haragus H. Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary locked nailing in tibial fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(8):1597–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson CM, McLauchlan GJ, McLean IP, Court-Brown CM. Distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia with minimal involvement of the ankle. Classification and treatment by locked intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77(5):781–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Henley MB, Chapman JR, Agel J, Harvey EJ, Whorton AM, Swiontkowski MF. Treatment of type II, IIIA, and IIIB open fractures of the tibial shaft: a prospective comparison of unreamed interlocking intramedullary nails and half-pin external fixators. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12(1):1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tornetta P, 3rd, Bergman M, Watnik N, Berkowitz G, Steuer J. Treatment of grade-IIIb open tibial fractures. A prospective randomised comparison of external fixation and non-reamed locked nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76(1):13–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Joveniaux P, Ohl X, Harisboure A, Berrichi A, Labatut L, Simon P, et al. Distal tibia fractures: management and complications of 101 cases. Int Orthop. 2010;34(4):583–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zelle BA, Bhandari M, Espiritu M, Koval KJ, Zlowodzki M, Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. Treatment of distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a systematic review of 1125 fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(1):76–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McFerran MA, Smith SW, Boulas HJ, Schwartz HS. Complications encountered in the treatment of pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6(2):195–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lang GJ, Cohen BE, Bosse MJ, Kellam JF. Proximal third tibial shaft fractures. Should they be nailed? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;(315):64–74.

  21. Vaisto O, Toivanen J, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. Anterior knee pain and thigh muscle strength after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a report of 40 consecutive cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(1):18–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kambiz Sarahrudi MD, PD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jöstl, J., Tiefenböck, T., Hofbauer, M. et al. Distal tibial fractures: evaluation of different fixation techniques. Wien Klin Wochenschr 129, 164–168 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0730-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0730-x

Keywords

Navigation