Skip to main content
Log in

Cubic bipolar fuzzy set with application to multi-criteria group decision making using geometric aggregation operators

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bipolar irrational emotions are implicated in a broad variety of individual actions. For example, two specific elements of decision making are the benefits and adverse effects. The harmony and respectful coexistence between these two elements is viewed as a cornerstone to a healthy social setting. For bipolar fuzzy characteristics of the universe of choices that rely on a small range of degrees, a bipolar fuzzy decision making method utilizing different techniques is accessible. The idea of a simplistic bipolar fuzzy set is ineffective in supplying consistency to the details about the frequency of the rating due to minimal knowledge. In this respect, we present cubic bipolar fuzzy sets (CBFSs) as a generalization of bipolar fuzzy sets. The plan of this research is to establish an innovative multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) based on cubic bipolar fuzzy set (CBFS) by unifying aggregation operators under geometric mean operations. The geometric mean operators are regarded to be a helpful technique, particularly in circumstances where an expert is unable to fuse huge complex unwanted information properly at the outset of the design of the scheme. We present some basic operations for CBFSs under dual order, i.e., \(\mathrm {P}\)-Order and \(\mathrm {R}\)-Order. We introduce some algebraic operations on CBFSs and some of their fundamental properties for both orders. We propose \(\mathrm {P}\)-cubic bipolar fuzzy weighted geometric (\(\mathrm {P}\)-CBFWG) operator and \(\mathrm {R}\)-cubic bipolar fuzzy weighted geometric (\(\mathrm {R}\)-CBFWG) operator to aggregate cubic bipolar fuzzy data. We also discuss the useability and efficiency of these operators in MCGDM problem. In human decisions, the second important part is ranking of alternatives obtained after evaluation. In this regard, we present an improved score and accuracy function to compare the cubic bipolar fuzzy elements (CBFEs). We also discuss a set theoretic comparison of proposed set with other theories as well as method base comparison of the proposed method with some existing techniques of bipolar fuzzy domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alghamdi MA, Alshehri NO, Akram M (2018) Multi-criteria decision-making methods in bipolar fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(6):20–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT, Gargov G (1989) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 31:343–349

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang J, Chen ZS, Xiong S, Zhang J, Chin K (2019) Intuitionistic fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making: a consolidated model with application to emergency plan selection. IEEE Access 7:41958–41980

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZS, Yu C, Chin KS, Martinez L (2019a) An enhanced ordered weighted averaging operators generation algorithm with applications for multi-criteria decision making. Appl Math Model 71:467–490

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZS, Chin KS, Tsui KL (2019b) Constructing the geometric Bonferroni mean from the generalized Bonferroni mean with several extensions to linguistic 2-tuples for decision-making. Appl Soft Comput 78:595–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZS, Yang Y, Wang XJ, Chin KS, Tsui KL (2019c) Fostering linguistic decision-making under uncer tainty: A proportional interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on Hamacher aggregation operators and andness optimization models. Inf Sci 500:229–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZS, Martinez L, Chang JP, Wang XJ, Xionge SH, Chin KS (2019d) Sustainable building material selection: a QFD- and ELECTRE III-embedded hybrid MCGDM approach with consensus building. Eng Appl Artif Intell 85:783–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZS, Li M, Kong WT, Chin KS (2019e) Evaluation and selection of HazMat transportation alter natives: a PHFLTS- and TOPSIS-integrated multi-perspective approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:4116

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng W, Zhao H, Zou L et al (2017a) A novel collaborative optimization algorithm in solving complex optimization problems. Soft Comput 21:4387–4398

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng W, Zhao H, Yang X, Xiong J, Sun M, Li B (2017b) Study on an improved adaptive PSO algorithm for solving multi-objective gate assignment. Appl Soft Comput 59:288–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng W, Xu J, Zhao H (2019a) An improved ant colony optimization algorithm based on hybrid strategies for scheduling problem. IEEE Access 7:20281–20292

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng W, Yao R, Zhao H et al (2019b) A novel intelligent diagnosis method using optimal LS-SVM with improved PSO algorithm. Soft Comput 23:2445–2462

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Arora R (2018) Dual hesitant fuzzy soft aggregation operators and their application in decision making. Cognit Comput 10(5):769–789

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Kumar K (2020) A novel exponential distance and its based TOPSIS method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets using connection number of SPA theory. Artif Intell Revi 53:595–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul Z (2015) Some bipolar fuzzy aggregations operators and their applications in multi-criteria group decision making. M.Phil Thesis

  • Hashmi MR, Riaz M (2020) A novel approach to censuses process by using pythagorean m-polar fuzzy Dombi’s aggregation operators. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 38(2):1977–1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashmi MR, Riaz M, Smarandache F (2020) m-polar neutrosophic topology with applications to multi- criteria decision-making in medical diagnosis and clustering analysis. Int J Fuzzy Syst 22(1):273–292

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jana C, Pal M, Wang JQ (2019a) Bipolar fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its application in multiple—attribute decision-making process. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput 10(9):3533–3549

    Google Scholar 

  • Jana C, Pal M, Wang JQ (2019b) Bipolar fuzzy Dombi prioritized aggregation operators and its application in multiple-attribute decision-making process. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04130-z

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jana C, Pal M, Wang JQ (2019c) A robust aggregation operators for multi-criteria decision making method with bipolar fuzzy soft environment. Iran J Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijfs.2019.4575

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jun YB, Kim CS, Yang KO (2012) Cubic set. Ann Fuzzy Math Inf 4(1):83–98

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lu M, Busemeyer JR (2014) Do traditional chinese theories of Yi Jing Yin-Yang and Chinese medicine go beyond western concepts of mind and matter. Mind Matter 12(1):37–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem K, Riaz M, Peng XD, Afzal D (2019a) Pythagorean fuzzy soft MCGDM methods based on TOPSIS, VIKOR and aggregation operators. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 37(5):6937–6957

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem K, Riaz M, Afzal D (2019b) Pythagorean m-polar fuzzy sets and TOPSIS method for the selection of advertisement model. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 37(6):8441–8458

    Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S (2011) Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Syst Appl 38:12983–12990

    Google Scholar 

  • Riaz M, Hashmi MR (2019a) MCGDM for agribusiness in the environment of various cubic m-polar fuzzy averaging aggregation operators. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-182809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz M, Hashmi MR (2019b) Linear Diophantine fuzzy set and its applications towards multi-attribute decision making problems. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 37(4):5417–5439

    Google Scholar 

  • Riaz M, Hashmi MR (2020) Soft rough pythagorean m-polar fuzzy sets and pythagorean m-polar fuzzy soft rough sets with application to decision-making. Comput Appl Math 39(1):1–36

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz M, Tehrim ST (2019a) Cubic bipolar fuzzy ordered weighted geometric aggregation operators and their application using internal and external cubic bipolar fuzzy data. Comput Appl Math 38(2):1–25

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz M, Tehrim ST (2019b) Multi-attribute group decision making based cubic bipolar fuzzy information using averaging aggregation operators. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 37(2):2473–2494

    Google Scholar 

  • Riaz M, Tehrim ST (2019c) Bipolar fuzzy soft mappings with application to bipolar disorders. Int J Biomath 12(7):1950080

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar M, Akram M, Zafar F (2018) Decision making approach based on competition graphs and extended TOPSIS method under bipolar fuzzy environment. Math Comput Appl 23(4):68

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrim ST, Riaz M (2019) A novel extension of TOPSIS to MCGDM with bipolar neutrosophic soft topol ogy. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 37(4):5531–5549

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuei HJ, Tsai WH, Pan FT, Tzeng GH (2018) Improving search engine optimization (SEO) by using hybrid modified MCDM models. Artif Intell Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9644-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei G (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision-making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33:2119–2132

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wei GW, Wei C, Gao H (2018a) Multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued bipolar fuzzy information and their application to emerging technology commercialization evaluation. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2875261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei GW, Gao H, Wang J, Huang YH (2018b) Research on risk evaluation of enterprise human capital investment with interval-valued bipolar 2-tuple linguistic information. IEEE Access 6:35697–35712

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Alsaadi FE, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2018c) Bipolar fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(1):1–12

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong SH, Chen ZS, Chang JP, Chin KS (2019) On extended power average operators for decision-making: a case study in emergency response plan selection of civil aviation. Comput Ind Eng 130:258–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q, Yu K, Zeng S, Liu J (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy induced generalized OWA operator and its application to multi-criteria group decision-making. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 13:1527–1536

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18(1):183–190

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon KP, Kim WK (2017) The behavioral TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl 89:266–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1971) Similarity relations and fuzzy ordering. Inf Sci 3:199–249

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan J, Alcantud JCR (2018) A novel type of soft rough covering and its application to multi-criteria group decision-making. Artif Intell Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9617-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan J, Xu W (2018) Two types of coverings based multi-granulation rough fuzzy sets and applications to decision making. Artif Intell Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09729-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WR (1994) Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: a computational frame work for cognitive modeling and multi-agent decision analysis. In: Proceedings of IEEE conference, pp 305–309

  • Zhang WR (1998) Bipolar fuzzy sets. In: Proceedings of fuzzy IEEE, pp 835–840

  • Zhang WR (2013) Bipolar quantum logic gates and quantum cellular combinatorics a logical extension to quantum entanglement. J Quantum Inf Sci 3(2):93–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WR, Pandurangi KA, Peace KE, Zhang Y, Zhao Z (2011) Mental squares: a generic bipolar support vector machine for psychiatric disorder classification, diagnostic analysis and neurobiological data mining. Int J Data Min Bio-inform 5(5):532–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Gao W, Deng W, Sun M (2018) Study on an adaptive co-evolutionary ACO algorithm for complex optimization problems. Symmetry 10(4):104

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Liu H, Xu J, Deng W (2019) Performance prediction using high-order differential mathematical morphology gradient spectrum entropy and extreme learning machine. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2019.2948414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Zheng J, Deng W, Song Y (2020) Semi-supervised broad learning system based on manifold regu larization and broad network. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 67(3):983–994

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the editor in chief, associate editor and anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments and suggestions that have been helpful for providing a better version of the present work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syeda Tayyba Tehrim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Muhammad Riaz declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Syeda Tayyba Tehrim declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riaz, M., Tehrim, S.T. Cubic bipolar fuzzy set with application to multi-criteria group decision making using geometric aggregation operators. Soft Comput 24, 16111–16133 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04927-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04927-3

Keywords

Navigation