Skip to main content
Log in

The coordination mechanisms of emergency inventory model under supply disruptions

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops a cooperative emergency inventory model to deal with supply disruptions. To achieve a cooperative state between the two sides in supply chain, the game theory is used and three coordination mechanisms are proposed. With the emergency inventory method which has been established, many tests of numerical experiments are made. The aim is to find the optimal mechanism so that the conditions of three mechanisms need to meet are analyzed. Results show that the total profits of the whole supply chain are unchanged in return mechanism. In cost-sharing mechanism, the manufacturer’s profits are smaller than the profits before coordination, and the supplier’s profits are greater than the former, but total profits of the whole supply chain become larger. The proposed model with the introduction of a second manufacturer mechanism performs best, which can make up the expenses by using the new joined manufacturers. It also can help the manufacturers respond to the supply disruptions effectively and that will not harm the profits of both sides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arampantzi C, Minis I (2017) A new model for designing sustainable supply chain networks and its application to a global manufacturer. J Clean Prod 156:276–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackhurst J, Craighead CW, Handfield RB (2006) Towards supply chain collaboration: an operations audit of VMI initiatives in the electronics industry. Int J Integr Supply Manag 2(92):91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookbinder JH (2010) Calculating the benefits of vendor managed inventory in a manufacturer-retailer system. Int J Prod Res 48(19):5549–5571

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, Shen J, Feng M (2014) Disruptions management of a supply chain under strategic subsidy policy for the demand-stimulating inventory. Comput Ind Eng 76(C):169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary D, Shankar R (2015) The value of VMI beyond information sharing in a single supplier multiple retailers supply chain under a non-stationary (\(R^{n}\), \(S^{n})\) policy. Omega 51:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemons R, Slotnick SA (2016) The effect of supply-chain disruption, quality and knowledge transfer on firm strategy. Int J Prod Econ 178:169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan R, Zhao X (2010) On contracts for VMI program with continuous review (r, Q) policy. Eur J Oper Res 207(2):656–667

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hariga M, Gumus M, Daghfous A (2014) Storage constrained vendor managed inventory models with unequal shipment frequencies. Omega 48(10):94–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Zhao X (2016) Contracts and coordination: supply chains with uncertain demand and supply. Nav Res Logist 63(4):305–319

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hou J, Zeng AZ, Zhao L (2010) Coordination with a backup supplier through buy-back contract under supply disruption. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 46(6):881–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui SL, Thai VV (2015) Cost consequences of a port-related supply chain disruption. Asian J Shipp Logist 31(3):319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui SL, Zhou Q, Thai VV et al (2017) Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of port-centric supply chain disruption threats. Ocean Coast Manag 148:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji X, Sun J, Wang Z (2017) Turn bad into good: Using transshipment-before-buyback for disruptions of stochastic demand. Int J Prod Econ 185:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Cho RK (2014) Contracting for vendor-managed inventory with consignment stock and stockout-cost sharing. Int J Prod Econ 151(1):158–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J-Y, Cho RK, Paik S-K (2016) Supply chain coordination in vendor-managed inventory systems with stockout-cost sharing under limited storage capacity. Eur J Oper Res 248(1):95–106

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Chen Y (2010) Impacts of supply disruptions and customer differentiation on a partial-backordering inventory system. Simul Model Pract Theory 18(5):547–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Wang S, Cheng TCE (2010) Competition and cooperation in a single-retailer two-supplier supply chain with supply disruption. Int J Prod Econ 124(1):137–150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mateen A, Chatterjee AK, Mitra S (2014) VMI for single-vendor multi-retailer supply chains under stochastic demand. Comput Ind Eng 79:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meena PL, Sarmah SP (2016) Supplier selection and demand allocation under supply disruption risks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(1):265–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ming Y, Grabot B, Houé R (2014) A typology of the situations of cooperation in supply chains. Comput Ind Eng 67:56–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nia AR, Far MH, Niaki STA (2015) A hybrid genetic and imperialist competitive algorithm for green vendor managed inventory of multi-item multi-constraint EOQ model under shortage. Appl Soft Comput 30(C):353–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Park YW, Hong P, Roh JJ (2013) Supply chain lessons from the catastrophic natural disaster in Japan. Bus Horiz 56(1):75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park K, Min H, Min S (2016) Inter-relationship among risk taking propensity, supply chain security practices, and supply chain disruption occurrence. J Purch Supply Manag 22(2):120–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray P, Jenamani M (2016) Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: a newsvendor approach. Ann Oper Res 237(1):237–262

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ru J, Wang Y (2010) Consignment contracting: who should control inventory in the supply chain? Eur J Oper Res 201(3):760–769

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Samvedi A, Jain V, Chan FTS (2013) Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Int J Prod Res 51(8):2433–2442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargut FZ, Qi L (2012) Analysis of a two-party supply chain with random disruptions. Oper Res Lett 40(2):114–122

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Kumar S (2015) A behavioral experiment on inventory management with supply chain disruption. Int J Prod Econ 169(11):169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt AJ (2011) Strategies for customer service level protection under multi-echelon supply chain disruption risk. Transp Res Part B Methodol 45(8):1266–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CX (2009) Random yield and uncertain demand in decentralized supply chains under the traditional and VMI arrangements. Int J Prod Res 47(7):1955–1968

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XF, Zhang W, Li N et al (2015) A bi-level programming model of resource matching for collaborative logistics network in supply uncertainty environment. J Frankl Inst 352(9):3873–3884

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XF, Hao J, Deng YR et al (2017) Design optimization of resource combination for collaborative logistics network under uncertainty. Appl Soft Comput 56(7):684–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan R, Lu B, Wu J (2016) Contract coordination strategy of supply chain with substitution under supply disruption and stochastic demand. Sustainability 8(7):676–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Martin D (2008) The inventory value of information sharing, continuous replenishment, and vendor-managed inventory. Transp Res Part E 44(3):361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye F, Li Y (2011) A Stackelberg single-period supply chain inventory model with weighted possibilistic mean values under fuzzy environment. Appl Soft Comput 11(8):5519–5527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanoni S, Jaber MY, Zavanella LE (2012) Vendor managed inventory (VMI) with consignment considering learning and forgetting effects. Int J Prod Econ 140(2):721–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Wang S, Cheng TCE et al (2010) Coordination of supply chains by option contracts: a cooperative game theory approach. Eur J Oper Res 207(2):668–675

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Studies in this paper were supported by Natural Science Foundation (71402038, 71774019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiaguo Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal participants performed by the author.

Additional information

Communicated by X. Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Zhou, H. & Wang, J. The coordination mechanisms of emergency inventory model under supply disruptions. Soft Comput 22, 5479–5489 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3147-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3147-4

Keywords

Navigation