Abstract
Does the silvopastoral system (SPS) promote a satisfactory thermal environment for dairy cows to perform their natural behaviors and perform a suitable thermoregulatory function? To answer this, peer-reviewed articles, written in English and evaluating the effects of silvopastoral systems on thermal environment, dairy cows’ behavior, and physiology were used in this systematic review; additionally, a bibliometric approach was performed. Web of Science and Google Scholar were used to compile the literature. The resulting articles (1448) underwent a 4-step appraisal process and resulted in 19 articles that fitted our inclusion criteria. Microclimate variables and thermal comfort indicators were the most researched topics (discussed in 89% of studies); 47% of studies addressed cattle behavior and 36% physiological responses. Our review highlights different benefits of silvopastoral systems for grazing dairy cows. For example, the SPS provides a more comfortable thermal environment than treeless pasture, which increases feeding behaviors; furthermore, dairy cows in SPS show lower drinking events, surface temperature, and respiratory rate than cows raised in treeless pasture. However, for nine of the variables related to cows’ behavior (e.g., resting, rumination) and physiology responses (e.g., internal temperature), the results of the studies were unclear. Furthermore, behaviors associated with lying down (e.g., idling and rumination) and milk production in SPS were explored only in six and two studies, respectively. These findings provide consistent evidence that the silvopastoral systems are beneficial to thermal comfort of dairy cows; nonetheless, the effect on cows’ behavioral and physiological responses is still scarce and unclear.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00484-023-02431-5/MediaObjects/484_2023_2431_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00484-023-02431-5/MediaObjects/484_2023_2431_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00484-023-02431-5/MediaObjects/484_2023_2431_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abreu AS, Fischer V, Thaler A et al (2020) Access to shade reduces DNA damage of Holstein cows under mild heat stress. Anim Prod Sci 60:1539–1546. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19075
Améndola L, Solorio FJJ, Ku-Vera JCC et al (2016) Social behaviour of cattle in tropical silvopastoral and monoculture systems. Animal 10:863–867. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115002475
Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 11:959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Arias PA, Bellouin N, Coppola E et al (2021) Technical summary. In Climate Change 2021: The physical science basis. In: Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA
Armstrong DV (1994) Heat stress interaction with shade and cooling. J Dairy Sci 77:2044–2050. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77149-6
Beaver A, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG (2021) Invited review : the welfare of dairy cattle housed in tiestalls compared to less-restrictive housing types : a systematic review. J Dairy Sci. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19609
Becker CA, Stone AE (2020) Graduate student literature review: heat abatement strategies used to reduce negative effects of heat stress in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 103:9667–9675
Blanco-Penedo I, Velarde A, Kipling RP, Ruete A (2020) Modeling heat stress under organic dairy farming conditions in warm temperate climates within the Mediterranean basin. Clim Change 162:1269–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02818-y
Bouissou MF, Boissy A, Neindre P, Veissier I (2001) The social behaviour of cattle. In: Keeling LJ, Gonyou HW (eds) Social behaviour in farm animals, 1st ed., Wallingford UK, pp 113–145
Brown-Brandl TM, Eigenberg RA, Nienaber JA (2006) Heat stress risk factors of feedlot heifers. Livest Sci 105:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.04.025
Burhans WS, Rossiter Burhans CA, Baumgard LH (2022) Invited review: lethal heat stress: the putative pathophysiology of a deadly disorder in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21080
Cardoso CS, von Keyserlingk MAG, Hötzel MJ (2019) Views of dairy farmers, agricultural advisors, and lay citizens on the ideal dairy farm. J Dairy Sci 102:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14688
Carnevalli RA, de Mello ACT, Coletti AJ, Garcia LF, Xavier DB (2020) Shade controls the ruminating and idleness times of dairy heifers in tropical integrated systems. Agroforestry Systems 94(3):779–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00448-7
Chang-Fung-Martel J, Harrison MT, Brown JN et al (2021) Negative relationship between dry matter intake and the temperature - humidity index with increasing heat stress in cattle : a global meta - analysis. Int J Biometeorol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-021-02167-0
Chará J, Reyes E, Peri P et al (2019) Silvopastoral systems and their contribution to improved resource use and sustainable development goals: evidence from Latin America. FAO, California
Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2011) An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. J Informetr 5:146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
Cox B, Gasparrini A, Catry B et al (2016) Mortality related to cold and heat. What do we learn from dairy cattle? Environ Res 149:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.05.018
Crump A, Jenkins K, Bethell EJ et al (2021) Optimism and pasture access in dairy cows. Sci Rep 11:4882. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84371-x
Cubbage F, Balmelli G, Bussoni A et al (2012) Comparing silvopastoral systems and prospects in eight regions of the world. Agroforestry Systems 86:303–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9482-z
Daros RR, Bran JA, Hötzel MJ, Von Keyserlingk MAG (2019) Readily available water access is associated with greater milk production in grazing dairy herds. Animals 9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9020048
De Rensis F, Garcia-Ispierto I, López-Gatius F (2015) Seasonal heat stress: clinical implications and hormone treatments for the fertility of dairy cows. Theriogenology 84:659–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.04.021
de Sousa KT, Deniz M, do Vale MM et al (2021a) Influence of microclimate on dairy cows’ behavior in three pasture systems during the winter in south Brazil. J Therm Biol 97:102873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.102873
de Sousa KT, Deniz M, Moro MF et al (2021b) Developing of a model to predict lying behavior of dairy cows on silvopastoral system during the winter season. Int J Biometeorol 65:1781–1786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-021-02121-0
De Souza W, Barbosa OR, Marques JDA et al (2010) Microclimate in silvipastoral systems with eucalyptus in rank with different heights. Rev Bras Zootec 39:685–694. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000300030
Deniz M, Schmitt Filho AL, Farley J et al (2019) High biodiversity silvopastoral system as an alternative to improve the thermal environment in the dairy farms. Int J Biometeorol 63:83–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-1638-8
Deniz M, Schmitt Filho AL, Hötzel MJ et al (2020) Microclimate and pasture area preferences by dairy cows under high biodiversity silvopastoral system in Southern Brazil. Int J Biometeorol 64:1877–1887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-020-01975-0
Deniz M, De Sousa KT, Gomes IC et al (2021b) Classification of environmental factors potentially motivating for dairy cows to access shade. J Dairy Res:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029921000509
Deniz M, de Sousa KT, Moro MF et al (2021a) Social hierarchy influences dairy cows’ use of shade in a silvopastoral system under intensive rotational grazing. Appl Anim Behav Sci 244:105467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105467
Dudley N, Alexander S (2017) Agriculture and biodiversity: a review. Biodiversity 18:45–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2017.1351892
England JR, O’Grady AP, Fleming A et al (2020) Trees on farms to support natural capital: an evidence-based review for grazed dairy systems. Sci Total Environ 704:135345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135345
Fournel S, Ouellet V, Charbonneau É (2017) Practices for alleviating heat stress of dairy cows in humid continental climates: a literature review. Animals 7:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7050037
Gaughan JB, Mader TL, Holt SM et al (2010) Assessing the heat tolerance of 17 beef cattle genotypes. Int J Biometeorol 54:617–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0233-4
Gebremedhin KG, Wu B, Perano K (2016) Modeling conductive cooling for thermally stressed dairy cows. J Therm Biol 56:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.01.004
Giro A, Pezzopane JRM, Barioni Junior W et al (2019) Behavior and body surface temperature of beef cattle in integrated crop-livestock systems with or without tree shading. Sci Total Environ 684:587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.377
Guimarães-Yamada KL, dos Santos GT, Osório JAC et al (2022) Influence of different heat-stress-reducing systems on physiological and behavioral responses and social dominance of Holstein and Jersey Cows and Heifers on pasture. Animals 12:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12182318
Habeeb AA, Gad AE, Atta MA (2018) Temperature-Humidity indices as indicators to heat stress of climatic conditions with relation to production and reproduction of farm animals. Int J Biotechnol Recent Adv 1:35–50. https://doi.org/10.18689/ijbr-1000107
Hanisch AL, Negrelle RR, Bonatto RA et al (2019) Evaluating sustainability in traditional silvopastoral systems (caívas): looking beyond the impact of animals on biodiversity. Sustainability 11:3098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113098
Harrison PA, Berry PM, Simpson G et al (2014) Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecosyst Serv 9:191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006
Hawke MF, Dodd MB (2003) Livestock shelter from trees - a review. In: NZGA: Research and Practice Series. pp 65–72
Herbut P, Angrecka S (2018) Relationship between THI level and dairy cows’ behaviour during summer period. Ital J Anim Sci 17:226–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1333892
Herbut P, Angrecka S, Walczak J (2018) Environmental parameters to assessing of heat stress in dairy cattle—a review. Int J Biometeorol 62:2089–2097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-1629-9
Herbut P, Angrecka S, Godyń D, Hoffmann G (2019) The physiological and productivity effects of heat stress in cattle-a review. Ann Anim Sci 19:579–593. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2019-0011
Herbut P, Hoffmann G, Angrecka S et al (2021) The effects of heat stress on the behaviour of dairy cows-a review. Ann Anim Sci 21:385–402. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2020-0116
Hill DL, Wall E (2015) Dairy cattle in a temperate climate: the effects of weather on milk yield and composition depend on management. Animal 9:138–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114002456
Hill DL, Wall E (2017) Weather influences feed intake and feed efficiency in a temperate climate. J Dairy Sci 100:2240–2257. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11047
Huzzey JM, DeVries TJ, Valois P, von Keyserlingk MAG (2006) Stocking density and feed barrier design affect the feeding and social behavior of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 89:126–133. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72075-6
Kadzere CT, Murphy MR, Silanikove N, Maltz E (2002) Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: a review. Livest Prod Sci 77:59–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00330-X
Karvatte N, Klosowski ES, de Almeida RG et al (2016) Shading effect on microclimate and thermal comfort indexes in integrated crop-livestock-forest systems in the Brazilian Midwest. Int J Biometeorol 60:1933–1941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-016-1180-5
Karvatte N, Miyagi ES, Carvalho de Oliveira C et al (2021) Spatiotemporal variations on infrared temperature as a thermal comfort indicator for cattle under agroforestry systems. J Therm Biol 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.102871
Kohari D, Kosako T, Fukasawa M, Tsukada H (2007) Effect of environmental enrichment by providing trees as rubbing objects in grassland: grazing cattle need tree-grooming: ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Anim Sci J 78:413–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2007.00455.x
Kondo S, Hurnik JF (1990) Stabilization of social hierarchy in dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 27:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90125-W
Lees AM, Lees JC, Lisle AT et al (2018) Effect of heat stress on rumen temperature of three breeds of cattle. Int J Biometeorol 62:207–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-017-1442-x
Lopes LB, Eckstein C, Pina DS et al (2016) The influence of trees on the thermal environment and behaviour of grazing heifers in Brazilian Midwest. Trop Anim Health Prod 48:755–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1021-x
Machado Filho LCP, Seó HLS, Daros RR et al (2021) Voisin rational grazing as a sustainable alternative for livestock production. Animals 11:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123494
Mader TL, Johnson LJ, Gaughan JB (2010) A comprehensive index for assessing environmental stress in animals. J Anim Sci 88:2153–2165. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2586
Magalhães CASS, Zolin CA, Lulu J et al (2020) Improvement of thermal comfort indices in agroforestry systems in the southern Brazilian Amazon. J Therm Biol 91:102636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102636
Martins CF, Fonseca-Neto AM, Bessler HC et al (2021) Natural shade from integrated crop–livestock–forestry mitigates environmental heat and increases the quantity and quality of oocytes and embryos produced in vitro by Gyr dairy cows. Livest Sci 244:104341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104341
McConnachie E, Thompson AJ, Smid AMC et al (2018) Cows are highly motivated to access a grooming substrate. Biol Lett 14:20180303. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0303
McDonald PV, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM (2020) Hot weather increases competition between dairy cows at the drinker. J Dairy Sci 103:3447–3458. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17456
Mee JF, Boyle LA (2020) Assessing whether dairy cow welfare is “better” in pasture-based than in confinement-based management systems. N Z Vet J 68:168–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2020.1721034
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4:1–9
Morignat E, Gay E, Vinard JL et al (2018) Impact of heat and cold waves on female cattle mortality beyond the effect of extreme temperatures. J Therm Biol 78:374–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.11.001
Nordlund KV, Strassburg P, Bennett TB et al (2019) Thermodynamics of standing and lying behavior in lactating dairy cows in freestall and parlor holding pens during conditions of heat stress. J Dairy Sci 102:6495–6507. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15891
Oliveira CC, Alves FV, Almeida RG et al (2017) Thermal comfort indices assessed in integrated production systems in the Brazilian savannah. Agrofor Syst 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0114-5
Peri PL, Dube F, Varella A (2016) Silvopastoral systems in the subtropical and temperate zones of South America: an overview. In: Silvopastoral Systems in Southern South America (Advances i, pp. 1–8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24109-8
Pezzopane JRM, Nicodemo MLF, Bosi C et al (2019) Animal thermal comfort indexes in silvopastoral systems with different tree arrangements. J Therm Biol 79:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.12.015
Polsky L, von Keyserlingk MAG (2017) Invited review: effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. J Dairy Sci 100:8645–8657. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12651
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
Rasmussen LV, Bierbaum R, Oldekop JA, Agrawal A (2017) Bridging the practitioner-researcher divide: indicators to track environmental, economic, and sociocultural sustainability of agricultural commodity production. Glob Environ Chang 42:33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.001
Reis NS, Ferreira IC, Mazocco LA et al (2021) Shade modifies behavioral and physiological responses of low to medium production dairy cows at pasture in an integrated crop-livestock-forest system. Animals 11:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082411
Saizi T, Mpayipheli M, Idowu PA (2019) Heat tolerance level in dairy herds: a review on coping strategies to heat stress and ways of measuring heat tolerance. J Anim Behav Biometeorol 7:39–51. https://doi.org/10.31893/2318-1265jabb.v7n2p39-51
Santos CMC, Pimenta CAM, Nobre MRC (2007) The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 15:508–511. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-11692007000300023
Schütz KE, Cave VM, Cox NR et al (2019) Effects of 3 surface types on dairy cattle behavior, preference, and hygiene. J Dairy Sci 102:1530–1541. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14792
Sejian V, Bhatta R, Gaughan JB et al (2018) Review: adaptation of animals to heat stress. Animal 12:S431–S444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001945
Sharpe KT, Heins BJ, Buchanan ES, Reese MH (2020) Evaluation of solar photovoltaic systems to shade cows in a pasture-based dairy herd. J Dairy Sci 104:2794–2806. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18821
Shu H, Wang W, Guo L, Bindelle J (2021) Recent advances on early detection of heat strain in dairy cows using animal-based indicators: a review. Animals 11:1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11040980
Skonieski FR, de Souza ER, Gregolin LCB et al (2021) Physiological response to heat stress and ingestive behavior of lactating Jersey cows in silvopasture and conventional pasture grazing systems in a Brazilian subtropical climate zone. Trop Anim Health Prod 53:213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02648-9
Souza EC, Salman AKD, da Cruz PG, Veit HM, de Carvalho GA, da Silva FRF, Schmitt E (2019) Thermal comfort and grazing behavior of Girolando heifers in integrated crop-livestock (ICL) and crop-livestock-forest (ICLF) systems. Acta Scientiarum - Animal Sciences 41(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.46483
St-Pierre NR, Cobanov B, Schnitkey G (2003) Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries1. J Dairy Sci 86:E52–E77. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74040-5
Sullivan AP, Bird DW, Perry GH (2017) Human behaviour as a long-term ecological driver of non-human evolution. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-016-0065
Thompson AJ, Weary DM, Bran JA et al (2019) Lameness and lying behavior in grazing dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 102:6373–6382. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15717
Thornton P, Nelson G, Mayberry D, Herrero M (2022) Impacts of heat stress on global cattle production during the 21st century: a modelling study. Lancet Planet Heal 6:e192–e201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00002-X
Tresoldi G, Schütz KE, Tucker CB (2018) Cooling cows with sprinklers: spray duration affects physiological responses to heat load. J Dairy Sci 101:4412–4423. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13806
Tresoldi G, Schütz KE, Tucker CB (2020) Sampling strategy and measurement device affect vaginal temperature outcomes in lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 103:5414–5421. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16667
Tucker CB, Jensen MB, de Passillé AM, et al (2020) Invited review: lying time and the welfare of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 0: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-18074
Tullo E, Finzi A, Guarino M (2019) Review: environmental impact of livestock farming and Precision Livestock Farming as a mitigation strategy. Sci Total Environ 650:2751–2760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.018
Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2014) Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding Y (ed) Measuring scholarly impact: methods and practice. Y. Ding, R. Springer, Switzerland, pp 285–320
Van Laer E, Moons CPHH, Ampe B et al (2015) Effect of summer conditions and shade on behavioural indicators of thermal discomfort in Holstein dairy and Belgian Blue beef cattle on pasture. Animal 9:1536–1546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000804
Vieira FMC, Deniz M, Vismara ES et al (2020) Thermoregulatory and behaviour responses of dairy heifers raised on a silvopastoral system in a subtropical climate. Ann Anim Sci 20:613–627. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2019-0074
Vieira FMC, Soares AA, Herbut P et al (2021) Spatio-thermal variability and behaviour as bio-thermal indicators of heat stress in dairy cows in a compost barn: a case study. Animals 11:1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051197
Vitali A, Felici A, Esposito S et al (2015) The effect of heat waves on dairy cow mortality. J Dairy Sci 98:4572–4579. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9331
Vizzotto EF, Fischer V, Thaler Neto A et al (2015) Access to shade changes behavioral and physiological attributes of dairy cows during the hot season in the subtropics. Animal 9:1559–1566. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000877
Volpi D, Alves FV, Arguelho S et al (2021) Environmental variables responsible for Zebu cattle thermal comfort acquisition. Int J Biometeorol 66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-021-02124-x
Young BA (1981) Cool stress as it affects animal production. J Anim Sci 52:154–163
Zimmer T, Buligon L, de Arruda SV et al (2020) Influence of clearness index and soil moisture in the soil thermal dynamic in natural pasture in the Brazilian Pampa biome. Geoderma 378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114582
Acknowledgements
M. Deniz and K.T. de Sousa acknowledge CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of High Education Personnel, Brazil) for the scholarship. Maria J. Hötzel acknowledge support from CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
Suplemantal Tables (XLSX 19.4 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Deniz, M., De-Sousa, K.T., Vieira, F.M.C. et al. A systematic review of the effects of silvopastoral system on thermal environment and dairy cows’ behavioral and physiological responses. Int J Biometeorol 67, 409–422 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-023-02431-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-023-02431-5