Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of adaptability of zebu cattle (Bos indicus) breeds in two different climatic conditions: using cytogenetic techniques on genome integrity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the genome integrity so as to assess the adaptability of three breeds of indigenous cattle reared under arid and semi-arid regions of Rajasthan (Bikaner) and Haryana (Karnal) India. The cattle were of homogenous group (same age and sex) of indigenous breeds viz. Sahiwal, Tharparkar and Kankrej. A total of 100 animals were selected for this study from both climatic conditions. The sister chromatid exchanges (SCE’s), chromosomal gaps and chromatid breaks were observed in metaphase plates of chromosome preparations obtained from in vitro culture of peripheral blood lymphocytes. The mean number of breaks and gaps in Sahiwal and Tharparkar of semi-arid zone were 8.56 ± 3.16, 6.4 ± 3.39 and 8.72 ± 2.04, 3.52 ± 6.29, respectively. Similarly, the mean number of breaks and gaps in Tharparkar and Kankrej cattle of arid zone were 5.26 ± 1.76, 2.74 ± 1.76 and 5.24 ± 1.84, 2.5 ± 1.26, respectively. The frequency of SCEs in chromosomes was found significantly higher (P < 0.05) in Tharparkar of semi-arid region (4.72 ± 1.55) compared to arid region (2.83 ± 1.01). Similarly, the frequency of SCEs was found to be 4.0 ± 1.41 in the Sahiwal of semi-arid region and 2.69 ± 1.12 in Kankrej of arid zone. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences (P < 0.05) amongst the different zones, i.e. arid and semi-arid, whereas no significant difference (P > 0.05) was observed in the same zone. The analysis of frequency of CAs and SCEs revealed significant effects of environmental conditions on the genome integrity of animals, thereby indicating an association with their adaptability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed S, Mahrous K, El-Sobhy H (1998) Cytogenetic study of buffalo under pollution of environmental conditions. Mutat Res 419:21–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan CR, Yadav BR, Yadav JS (1985) Spontaneous pericentric inversion in Indian buffalo. Nucleus 28:45–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley DG, Mac Hugh DE, Cunningham P, Loftus RT (1996) Mitochondrial diversity and the origins of African and European cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:5131–5135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan JB, Patel RK, Singh KM, Soni KJ (2009) Impact of a novel cytogenetic finding (unusual X;X translocation) on fertility of a buffalo bull (Bubalus bubalis). Buffalo Bulletin 28:151–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitra CK, Vishwanathan H, Deepa E, Rani MVU (2001) Cytogenetic monitoring of men occupationally exposed to air borne pollutants. Environ Pollut 112:391–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciotola F, Peretti V, Di Meo GP, Perucatti A, Iannuzzi L, Barbieri V (2005) Sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) in the Agerolese cattle population. Vet Res Comm 29(2):359–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das P, John G (1999) Induction of sister chromatid exchanges and chromosome aberrations in vivo in Etroplus suratensis (Bloch) following exposure to organophosphorus pesticides. Toxicol Lett 104:111–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das SK, Upadhyay RC, Madan ML (1999) Heat stress in Murrah buffalo calves. Livest Prod Sci 61:71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Meo GP, Perucatti A, Fornataro D, Incarnato D, Ferrara L, Matassino D, Iannuzzi L (2000) Sister chromatid exchange in chromosomes of sheep (Ovis aries). Cytobios 101:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaughan JB, Mader TL, Holt SM, Josey MJ, Rowan KJ (1999) Heat tolerance of Boran and Tuli crossbred steers. J Anim Sci 77:2398–2405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gauly M, Bollwein H, Breves G, Brugemann K, Danicke S, Das G, Demeler J, Hansen H, Isselstein J, Konig S, Loholter M, Martinsohn M, Meyer U, Potthoff M, Sanker C, Schroder B, Wrage N, Meibaum B, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Stinshof Wrenzycki C (2013) Future consequences and challenges for dairy cow production systems arising from climate change in Central Europe. Animal 7:843–859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HC, Garnett JT (2014) Food security and sustainable intensification. Philos Trans R Soc Biol Sci 369:1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn GL (1999) Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. J Anim Sci 77:10–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen PJ (2004) Physiological and cellular adaptations of zebu cattle to thermal stress. Anim Reprod Sci 82-83:349–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iannuzzi L, Di Meo GP, Perucatti A, Ferrara L, Gustavsson I (1991) Sister chromatid exchange in chromosomes of cattle from three different breeds reared under similar conditions. Hereditas 114:201–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iannuzzi L, Perucatti A, Di Meo GP (2004) Chromosome fragility in two sheep flocks dioxins during pasturage. Mutagenesis 19:355–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers in climate change 2007. The physical science basis contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp JR, Laur GL, Vadas PA, Weiss WP, Tricarico JM (2014) Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. J Dairy Sci 97:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koluman N, Silanikove N (2014) Impacts of climate change on the goat farming sector in harsh environments. Small Rumin. doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.11.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacetera N, Bernabucci U, Scalia D, Basiricò L, Morera P, Nardone A (2006) Heat stress elicits different responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from Brown Swiss and Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 89:4606–4612. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (06)72510-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lioi MB, Barbieri R, Borzacchiello G, Dezzi S, Roperto S, Santoro A, Russo V, Roperto F (2004) Chromosome aberration in cattle with chronic enzootic haematuria. J Comp Path 113:233–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretti V, Ciotiola F, Di Meo GP, Perucatti A, Iannuzzi L, Barbieri V (2005) Comparison of genome stability in two pig breeds by using the sister chromatid exchange (SCE) test. Ital J Anim Sci 4(2):97–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Peretti V, Ciotola F, Albarella S, Russo V, Meo Di GP (2007) Chromosome fragility in cattle with chronic enzootic haematuria. Mutagenesis 22:317–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perry P, Wolff S (1974) New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature 251:156–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renaudeau D, Collin A, Yahav S, de Basilio V, Gourdine JL, Collier RJ (2012) Adaptation to hot climate and strategies to alleviate heat stress in livestock production. Animal 6:707–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossner Jr P, Rossnerova A, Spatova M, Beskid O, Uhlirova K, Libalova H, Solansky I, Topinka J, Sram RJ (2013) Analysis of biomarkers in a Czech population exposed to heavy air pollution. Part II: chromosomal aberrations and oxidative stress. Mutagenesis 28(1):97–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Segnalini M, Bernabucci U, Vitali A, Nardone A, Lacetera NN (2013) Temperature humidity index scenarios in the Mediterranean basin. Int J Biometeorol 57:451–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seung HK, Jee YK, Jong KL, Young RS (2013) Recent advances in in vivo genotoxicity testing: prediction of carcinogenic potential using comet and micronucleus assay in animal models. J Cancer Prev 18(4):277–288. doi:10.15430/JCP.2013.18.4.277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom EC (1959) The discomfort index. Weatherwise 12:57–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojcik E, Smalec E, Danielewicz A (2011) Sister chromatid exchange in selected horse breeds (Equus caballus). Arch Tierz 54(2):107–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav BR (2000) Autosomal trisomy in zebu calf (Sahiwal breed of cattle). Cytogenet Cell Genet 71:76

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav BR, Kumar P, Tomar OS, Kumar S, Balin DS (1990) Monosomy-X and gonadal dysgenesis in buffalo heifer. Theriogenology 34:90

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project. Investigators are thankful to the director of ICAR-NDRI, Karnal for providing all facilities; vice chancellor of Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (RAJUVAS), Bikaner, Rajasthan for their help in providing the blood samples and the director of ICAR-CSSRI, Karnal for providing metrological data for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

All the animals were closely monitored and were provided similar managemental inputs during experimental period. The animals were treated following the compliance of the institute’s norms for ethical treatment. The experiment was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) constituted as per the article number 13 of the CPCSEA rules laid down by government of India. Norms regarding the ethical treatment of animals during the whole operation were strictly followed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Waiz, S.A., Sridhar Goud, T. et al. Assessment of adaptability of zebu cattle (Bos indicus) breeds in two different climatic conditions: using cytogenetic techniques on genome integrity. Int J Biometeorol 60, 873–882 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-015-1080-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-015-1080-0

Keywords

Navigation