Abstract
We aim to understand the relationship between people’s declared bioclimatic comfort, their personal characteristics (age, origin, clothing, activity and motivation, etc.) and the atmospheric conditions. To attain this goal, questionnaire surveys were made concurrently with weather measurements (air temperature, relative humidity, solar and long-wave radiation and wind speed) in two open leisure areas of Lisbon (Portugal), during the years 2006 and 2007. We analysed the desire expressed by the interviewees to decrease, maintain or increase the values of air temperature and wind speed, in order to improve their level of comfort. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyse the quantitative relation between preference votes and environmental and personal parameters. The preference for a different temperature depends on the season and is strongly associated with wind speed. Furthermore, a general decrease of discomfort with increasing age was also found. Most people declared a preference for lower wind speed in all seasons; the perception of wind shows significant differences depending on gender, with women declaring a lower level of comfort with higher wind speed. It was also found that the tolerance of warmer conditions is higher than of cooler conditions, and that adaptive strategies are undertaken by people to improve their level of comfort outdoors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACSE (American Society of Civil Engineers) (2004) Outdoor human comfort and its assessment. ACSE, Reston
Ahmed KS (2003) Comfort in urban spaces: Defining the boundaries of outdoor thermal comfort for the tropical urban environments. Energy Build 35:103–110
Andrade H, Alcoforado MJ (2008) Microclimatic variation of thermal comfort in a city-district of Lisbon (Telheiras). Night-time period. Theor Appl Climatol 92:225–237
Auliciems A, De Dear R (1997) Thermal adaptation and variable indoor climate control. In: Auliciems A (ed) Advances in bioclimatology - 5. Human bioclimatology. Springer, Queensland, Australia, pp 61–86
Bisanti L, Cadum E, Costa G, Michelozzi P, Perucci C, Russo A (2004) Heat waves and mortality in Italy. Epidemiology 15:97
Chen F, Kusaka H, Tewari M, Bao J-W, Hirakuchi H (2004) Utilizing the coupledWRF/LSM/Urban Modeling System withdetailed urban classification to simulate theurban heat island phenomena over theGreater Houston Area. 5th Conference onUrban Environment, Vancouver, BC,Canada, 23–27 August 2004
Conti S, Meli P, Minelli G, Solimini R, Toccaceli V, Vichi M, Beltrano C, Perini L (2005) Epidemiologic study of mortality during the summer 2003 heat wave in Italy. Environ Res 98:390–399
de Dear R, Brager GS (2001) The adaptive model of thermal comfort and energy conservation in the built environment. Int J Biometeorol 45:100–108
de Dear R, Brager GS (2002) Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy Build 34:549–561
INE (Instituto Nacional de Estatística) (2001) Recenseamentos Gerais da População e da Habitação. Dados comparativos 1991-2001. Lisboa, INE (CD-ROM
DeGroot DW, Havenith G, Kenney WL (2006) Responses to mild cold stress are predicted by different individual characteristics in young and older subjects. J Appl Physiol 101:1607–1615
Fanger PO (1972) Thermal comfort. McGraw-Hill, New York
Frank SM, Raja SN, Bulcao C, Goldstein (2000) DS. Age-related thermoregulatory differences during core cooling in humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 279:R349–R354
Gagge AP, Fobelets AP, Berglund LG (1986) A standard predictive index of human response to the thermal environment. ASHRAE Trans 92:709–731
Givoni B (1998) Climate considerations in building and urban design. Wileyc, New York
Givoni B, Noguchi M, Saaroni H, Pochter O, Yaacov Y, Feller N, Becker S (2003) Outdoor comfort research issues. Energy Build 35:77–86
Havenith G (2001) An individual model of human thermoregulation for the simulation of heat stress response. J Appl Physiol 90:1943–1954
Havenith G, Holmer I, Parsons K (2002) Personal factors in thermal comfort assessment: clothing properties and metabolic heat production. Energy Build 34:581–591
Hodder S, Parsons KC (2006) The effects of solar radiation on thermal comfort. Int J Biometeorol 51:233–250
Höppe P (1993) Heat balance modelling. Experientia 49:741–747
Höppe P (1997) Aspects of human biometeorology in past, present and future. Int J Biometeorol 40:19–23
Höppe P (1999) The physiological equivalent temperature - an universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment. Int J Biometeorol 43:71–75
Höppe P (2002) Different aspects of assessing indoor and outdoor thermal comfort. Energy Build 34:661–665
Hwang RL, Lin TP (2007) Thermal comfort requirements for occupants of semi-outdoor and outdoor environments in hot-humid regions. Archit Sci Rev 50:60–67
ISO (International Standards Organisation) (1990) Ergonomics of the thermal environment: estimation of metabolic heat production. International Standards Organisation, Geneva
Jendritzky G, Nübler W (1981) A model analysing the urban thermal environment in physiologically significant terms. Arch Met Geoph Biokl B 29:313–326
Kleinbaum DG, KupperAssistant LL, Nizam A, Muller KA (1998) Applied regression analysis and multivariable methods. Duxbury, Pacific Grove
Knes I, Thorsson S (2006) Influences of culture and environmental attitude on thermal, emotional and perceptual evaluations of a public square. Int J Biometeorol 50:258–268
Lin TP (2009) Thermal perception, adaptation and attendance in a public square in hot and humid regions. Build Environ 44:2017–2026
Lin TP, Matzarakis A (2008) Tourism climate and thermal comfort in Sun Moon Lake, Taiwan. Int J Biometeorol 52:281–290
Matzarakis A, Mayer H, Iziomom E (1999) Applications of a universal thermal index: physiological equivalent temperature. Int J Biometeorol 43:76–84
Memon RA, Chirarattananon S, Vangtook P (2008) Thermal comfort assessment and application of radiant cooling: a case study. Build Environ 43:1185–1196
Nikolopoulou M, Lykoudis S (2006) Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: analysis across different European countries. Build Environ 41:1455–1470
Oliveira S, Andrade H (2007) An initial assessment of the bioclimatic comfort in an outdoor public space in Lisbon. Int J Biometeorol 52:69–84
Parsons KC (1993) Human thermal environments. Taylor & Francis, London
Spagnolo J, de Dear R (2003) A human thermal climatology of subtropical Sydney. Int J Climatol 23:1383–1395
Stathopoulos T, Wu H, Zacharias J (2004) Outdoor human comfort in an urban climate. Build Environ 39:297–305
Steadman RG (1979) The assessment of sultriness. Part I: a temperature humidity index based on human physiology and clothing science. J Appl Meteorol 18:861–873
Thorsson S, Lindqvist M, Lindqvist S (2004) Thermal bioclimatic conditions and patterns of behaviour in an urban park in Göteborg, Sweden. Int J Biometeorol 48:149–156
Van Marken Lichtenbelt WD, Frijns AJ, van Ooijen MJ, Fiala D, Kester AM, van Steenhoven AA (2007) Validation of an individualised model of human thermoregulation for predicting responses to cold air. Int J Biometeorol 51:169–179
Vitinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, McCulloch CE (2005) Regression methods in biostatistics, linear, logistic and repeated measures models. Springer, New York
Walton D, Dravitzki V, Donn M (2007) The relative influence of wind, sunlight and temperature on user comfort in urban outdoor spaces. Build Environ 42:3166–3175
Acknowledgements
This study was developed in the framework of the project “URBKLIM: Climate and urban sustainability. Perception of comfort and climatic risks” (POCI/GEO/61148/2004), co-financed by FCT and FEDER (Operational Programme for Science and Innovation 2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andrade, H., Alcoforado, MJ. & Oliveira, S. Perception of temperature and wind by users of public outdoor spaces: relationships with weather parameters and personal characteristics. Int J Biometeorol 55, 665–680 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-010-0379-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-010-0379-0