Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

LSTM-CM: a hybrid approach for natural drought prediction based on deep learning and climate models

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Droughts cause severe damage to the economy, society, and environment. Drought forecasting plays an important role in establishing mitigation drought damage plans. In this study, a hybrid model involving long short-term memory and a climate model (LSTM-CM) is constructed for drought prediction. LSTM-CM was compared to the long short-term model stand-alone (LSTM-SA) and climate prediction model GloSea5 (GS5). The performance of models was evaluated based on the Pearson correlation coefficient (CC), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and skill score (SS). GS5 displayed physical robustness in predictions and did not reduce the amplitude or shift results. However, GS5 prediction tends to have a large bias caused by the inputs, model structure, and parameters. The MAEs of GS5 at 1, 2 and 3 months (0.41, 0.68, and 0.89) were higher than those of LSTM-SA (0.38, 0.61, and 0.89). The LSTM-SA reduced bias, but predictions were characterized by shifts, small variance, and failure to capture drought occurrences in long-lead-time cases. LSTM-CM yielded enhanced drought predictions by encompassing the low bias of LSTM-SA and the physical process simulation ability of GS5; thus, it inherited the good features of these models and limited the poor features. The SS values based on the CC, MAE, and RMSE of LSTM-CM compared to those of GS5 for 1-, 2-, and 3-month lead time predictions were improved from 29.17 to 54.29, 22.47 to 34.15, and 1.75 to 35.09%, respectively. LSTM-CM can accurately detect drought events and displayed less uncertainty in prediction than LSTM-SA and GS5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Sejong University Faculty program.

Funding

This work is supported by the Sejong University Faculty program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TQV: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis and investigation, Data curation, Writing—original draft preparation, Writing—review and editing. S-HK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing—review and editing, Project administration. DHN: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—review and editing. D-HB: Conceptualization, Writing—eview and editing, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deg-Hyo Bae.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vo, T.Q., Kim, SH., Nguyen, D.H. et al. LSTM-CM: a hybrid approach for natural drought prediction based on deep learning and climate models. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 37, 2035–2051 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02378-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02378-w

Keywords

Navigation