Skip to main content
Log in

Drought indicator analysis and forecasting using data driven models: case study in Jaisalmer, India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agricultural droughts are a prime concern for economies worldwide as they negatively impact the productivity of rain-fed crops, employment, and income per capita. In this study, Standard Precipitation Index (SPI) has been used to evaluate different drought indices for Rajasthan of India. In agricultural, hydrological, and meteorological applications such as irrigation scheduling, crop simulation, water budgeting, reservoir operations, and weather forecasting, the accurate estimation of the drought indices such as the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) plays an important role. Thus, the present study was conducted to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of the Random Subspace (RSS) model and its hybridization with the M5 Pruning tree (M5P), Random Forest (RF), and Random Tree (RT) to estimate the SPI at 3, 6, and 12 droughts during 2000–2019. Performances of RSS and hybridized algorithms were assessed and compared using performance indicators (i.e., MAE, RMSE, RAE, RRSE, and R2) and various graphical interpretations. Results indicated that the RSS-M5P provided the most accurate SPI prediction (MAE = 0.497, RMSE = 0.682, RAE = 81.88, RRSE = 87.22, and R2 = 0.507 for SPI-3; MAE = 0.452, RMSE = 0.717, RAE = 69.76, RRSE = 85.24, and R2 = 0.402 for SPI-6. And MAE = 0.294, RMSE = 0.377, RAE = 55.79, RRSE = 59.57, and R2 = 0.783 for SPI-12) compare to RSS alone, RSS-RF, and RSS-RT models for study the drought situation in Jaisalmer Rajasthan. The M5P algorithms have improved the performance of the RSS structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

SPI:

Standard Precipitation Index

RSS:

Random Subspace

M5P:

M5 Pruning tree

RF:

Random Forest

RT:

Random Tree

MAE:

Mean absolute error

RMSE:

Root mean square error

RAE:

Relative absolute error

RRSE:

Root relative squared error

R2 :

Coefficient of determination

P:

Precipitation

PET:

Potential evapotranspiration

°C:

Degree celsius

mm:

Millimetre

DrinC:

Drought Indices Calculator

SDR:

Standard deviation reduction factor

SE:

Standard error

ML:

Machine learning

MPMR:

Minimum probability machine regression

ELM:

Extreme learning machine

OSELM:

Online sequential-ELM

ANNs:

Artificial neural networks

SVR:

Support vector regression

WA-ANN:

Coupled wavelet-anns

MLP:

Multilayer perceptron

MLP-ICA:

Imperialistic Competitive Algorithm-MLP

MSPI:

Multivariate Standardized Precipitation Index

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are also thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve this manuscript further.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AE, MK and NLK: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Software, Writing-Original draft preparation. NLK, DKV, MK, CBP, PD, and AS: Visualization, Comments and Revisions recommendations, Writing-Reviewing and Editing. AE, CBP, PD: Supervision, Comments and Revisions Recommendations, Writing-Reviewing and Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. L. Kushwaha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

All authors comply with the guidelines of the journal Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

Consent to participate

All authors agreed to participate in this study.

Consent to publication

All authors agreed to the publication of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elbeltagi, A., Kumar, M., Kushwaha, N.L. et al. Drought indicator analysis and forecasting using data driven models: case study in Jaisalmer, India. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 37, 113–131 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02277-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02277-0

Keywords

Navigation