Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic risk assessment model for flood disaster on a projection pursuit cluster and its application

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aiming at reducing the losses from flood disaster, a dynamic risk assessment model for flood disaster is studied in this article. This model is built upon the projection pursuit cluster principle and risk indexes in the system, proceeding from the whole structure to its component parts. In this study, a fuzzy analytic hierarchy approach is employed to screen out the index system and determine the index weight, while the future value of each index is simulated by an improved back-propagation neural network algorithm. The proposed model adopts a dynamic evaluation method to analyze temporal data and assesses risk development by comprehensive analysis. The projection pursuit theory is used for clustering spatial data. The optimal projection vector is applied to calculate the risk cluster type. Therefore, the flood disaster risk level is confirmed and then the local conditions for presenting the control strategy. This study takes the Tunxi area, Huangshan city, as an example. After dynamic risk assessment model establishment, verification and application for flood disasters between the actual and simulated data from 2001 to 2013, the comprehensive risk assessment results show that the development trend for flood disaster risk is still in a decline on the whole, despite the rise in a few years. This is in accordance with the actual conditions. The proposed model is shown to be feasible for theory and application, providing a new way to assess flood disaster risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Begum S, Stive MJF, Hall JW (2010) Flood risk management in Europe: innovation in policy and practice. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH, Van den Bergh JCJM (2013) Individual preferences for reducing flood risk to near zero through elevation. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 18(2):229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Changjiang Water Resources Commission Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research (2004) Feasibility study on recent flood control engineering in Xin’anjiang River, Huangshan city, Anhui Province. Huangshan Water Conservancy Bureau, Huangshan (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Emma JT, Michael JC, Sally JP (2006) Confronting flood risk: implications for insurance and risk transfer. J Environ Manage 81(4):351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson K, Danielson M, Ekenberg L (2008) A framework for evaluation of flood management strategies. J Environ Manage 86(3):465–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang ZW, Zhou JZ, Song LX (2010) Flood disaster loss comprehensive evaluation model based on optimization support vector machine. Expert Syst Appl 37(5):3810–3814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huangshan Local Chronicles Office (1997–2008) Huangshan yearbook. Huangshan Book Press, Huangshan

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeyaseelan R, Sharma MK, Agrawal SK (2005) Flood management, flood risk assessment and flood plain zoning. China Water Resour 20:52–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji Z, Li N, Xie W, Jidong W, Zhou Y (2010) Comprehensive assessment of flood risk using the classification and regression tree method. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24(8):1175–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang WG, Deng L, Chen LY et al (2008a) Risk assessment and validation of flood disaster based on fuzzy mathematics. Prog Nat Sci 19(10):1419–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang WG, Li J, Chen YH (2008b) Risk assessment system for regional flood disaster (I): principle and method. J Nat Disasters 17(6):53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin JL, Yang XH, Wei YM (2005) System evaluation method based on fuzzy preferential relation matrix. Syst Eng-Theory Methodol Appl 14(4):364–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin JL, Hong TQ, Wang WS (2007) Entropy and FAHP based fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of water resources sustaining utilization. J Hydroelectr Eng 26(4):22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin JL, Wang YT, Wei YM et al (2009) Theoretical analysis frame based on general entropy and intelligence integration methodology for flood disaster risk management. Adv Water Sci 20(6):894–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HY, Liu HB, Yuan XM et al (2002) Peak value recognition theory of artificial neural network and its application to flood forecasting. J Hydraul Eng 6:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchi L, Borga M, Preciso E, Gaume E (2010) Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management. J Hydrol 394(1–2):118–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marco Costa A, Gonçalves M (2012) Clustering and forecasting of dissolved oxygen concentration on a river basin. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 26(4):519–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller A (2013) Flood risks in a dynamic urban agglomeration: a conceptual and methodological assessment framework. Nat Hazards 65(3):1931–1950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukesh KT, Chandranath C (2010) Uncertainty assessment and ensemble flood forecasting using bootstrap based artificial neural networks (BANNs). J Hydrol 382(1–4):20–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin GH, Ding J, Liu GD (2002) River flow prediction using artificial neural networks: self-adaptive error back-propagation algorithm. Adv Water Sci 13(1):37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel P (2008) Flood risk management: research and practice. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical bureau in Anhui province, Statistical bureau in China (1989–2008) Statistical yearbook. National Bureau of Statistics of China, Beijing (in Chinese)

  • Tian Z et al (2008) Projection pursuit method and its application. Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, Xi’an

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S (2005) Resource water conservancy-man and nature in harmony (revised edition). China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SJ, Li YQ (2007) A dynamic cluster model based on projection pursuit with its application to climate zoning. J Appl Meteorol Sci 18(5):722–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Cai SH, Yang YW et al (2010) Study on comprehensive grade evaluation of river health to Yihe River based on projection pursuit of entropy. J Water Resour Water Eng 21(3):120–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Barber ME, Chen S, Wu JQ (2014) SWAT modeling with uncertainty and cluster analyses of tillage impacts on hydrological processes. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water conservancy yearbook editing office in Anhui province (1999–2008) Water conservancy yearbook in Anhui province. Changjiang Press, Wuhan (in Chinese)

  • Wu KY, Jin JL, Wei YM (2009) Intelligent integrated model for forewarning evaluation of watershed water security. Adv Water Sci 20(4):518–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Lien H, Chang C (2013) Modeling risk analysis for forecasting peak discharge during flooding retention and warning operation. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(3):713–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XH, Yang ZF, Li JQ (2004) A genetic projection pursuit interpolation model for comprehensive assessment of water quality. Eng Sci 22(3):66–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu SW, Zhu KJ, Diao FQ (2008) A dynamic all parameters adaptive BP neural networks model and its application on oil reservoir prediction. Appl Math Comput 195(1):66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J (2011) Study on the risk assessment of regional flood disaster and forewarning system. Doctorial dissertation, Hohai University, Nanjing

  • Zhao J, Jin J, Zhang X et al (2012a) Dynamic risk assessment model for water quality on projection pursuit cluster. Hydrol Res 43(6):798–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Huang Z, Jin J et al (2012) Risk assessment of regional water resources and forewarning model at different time scales. J Hydrol Eng

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the support of the National Natural Science Funds of China (No. 71273081, No. 51309004, No. 51309072, No. 91337108, and No. 41375099), and Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology Research Foundation (S8112077001). The authors also want to thank the anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions and corrections on the earlier draft of our paper according to which we improved the content.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Jin, J., Guo, Q. et al. Dynamic risk assessment model for flood disaster on a projection pursuit cluster and its application. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28, 2175–2183 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0881-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0881-8

Keywords

Navigation