Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic neuro-fuzzy local modeling system with a nonlinear feature extraction for the online adaptive warning system of river temperature affected by waste cooling water discharge

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a dynamic modeling methodology based on a dynamic neuro-fuzzy local modeling system (DNFLMS) with a nonlinear feature extraction technique for an online dynamic modeling task. Prior to model building, a nonlinear feature extraction technique called the Gamma test (GT) is proposed to compute the lowest mean squared error (MSE) that can be achieved and the quantity of data required to obtain a reliable model. Two different DNFLMS modes are developed: (1) an online one-pass clustering and the extended Kalman filtering algorithm (mode 1); and (2) hybrid learning algorithm (mode 2) of extended Kalman filtering algorithm with a back-propagation algorithm trained to the estimated MSE and number of data points determined by a nonlinear feature extraction technique. The proposed modeling methodology is applied to develop an online dynamic prediction system of river temperature to waste cooling water discharge at 1 km downstream from a thermal power station from real-time to time ahead (2 h) sequentially at the new arrival of each item of river, hydrological, meteorological, power station operational data. It is demonstrated that the DNFLMS modes 1 and 2 shows a better prediction performance and less computation time required, compared to a well-known adaptive neural-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) trained with the back propagation (BP) learning algorithm, due to local generalization approach and one-pass learning algorithm implemented in the DNFLMS. It is shown that the DNFLMS mode 1 is that it can be used for an online modeling task without a large amount of training set required by the off-line learning algorithm of MLP-BP and ANFIS. The integration of the DNFLMS mode 2 with a nonlinear feature extraction technique shows that it can improve model generalization capability and reduce model development time by eliminating iterative procedures of model construction using a stopping criterion in training and the quantity of required available data in training given by the GT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacanli UG, Firat M, Dikbas F (2009) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for drought forecasting. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(8):1143–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brocard DN, Harleman DRF (1976) One-dimensional temperature predictions in unsteady flows. J Hydraul Eng 102(HY3):227–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RD, Ouellette RP, Chermisinoff PN (1983) Pollution control at electric power stations: comparisons for U.S. and Europe. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang F-J, Chang Y-T (2006) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for prediction of water level in reservoir. Adv Water Resour 29:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves P, Kojiri T (2007) Deriving reservoir operational strategies considering water quantity and quality objectives by stochastic fuzzy neural networks. Adv Water Resour 30(5):1329–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon B (2005) Applicability of neuro-fuzzy techniques in predicting ground-water vulnerability: a GIS-based sensitivity analysis. J Hydrol 309:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans D, Jones AJ (2002) A proof of the Gamma test. Proc R Soc Ser A 458:2759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH, Bentley JL, Finkel RA (1979) An algorithm for finding best matches in logarithmic expected time. ACM Trans Math Softw 3(3):209–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu DZ, Li YP, Huang GH (2011) A fuzzy-Markov-chain-based analysis method for reservoir operation. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. doi:10.1007/s00477-011-0497-1

  • Gelb A (1974) Applied optimal estimation. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykin S (1994) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Y-ST, White P (2009) Hydrological modeling using a dynamic neuro-fuzzy system with online and local learning algorithm, Adv Water Resour. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.10.006

  • Hong Y-S, Rosen MR, Reeves R (2002) Dynamic fuzzy modeling of storm water infiltration in urban fractured aquifers. J Hydrol Eng 7(5):380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang J-SR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23:665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobson HE, Keefer TN (1979) Modeling highly transient flow, mass and heat transport in the Chattahoochee River near Atlanta, Georgia. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1139

  • Jones AJ, Evans D, Margetts S, Durrant PJ (2002) The Gamma test. In: Sarker R et al (eds) Heuristic and optimization for knowledge discovery. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasabov N, Song Q (2002) DENFIS: dynamic, evolving neural-fuzzy inference systems and its application for time-series prediction. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(2):144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford TE (1990) Ecological effects of thermal discharges. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford TE, Aston RJ (1972) The ecology of some British rivers in relation to warm water discharges from power stations. Proc R Soc Lond B 180:407–419. doi:10.1098/rspb.1972.0027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CT, Lee CSG (1996) Neuro fuzzy system. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybeck PS (1982) Stochastic models, estimation and control, vol 2. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Polehn RA, Kinsel WC (1997) Transient temperature solution for stream flow from a controlled temperature source. Water Resour Res 33(1):261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinokot BA, Stefan HG (1993) Stream temperature dynamics: measurement and modeling. Water Resour Res 29(7):2299–2312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Q, Kasabov N (2001) ECM—a novel online, evolving clustering method and its applications. In: ANNES 2001, Dunedin, New Zealand, pp 87–92

  • Stefánsson A, Koncar N, Antonia JJ (1997) A note on the Gamma test. Neural Comput Appl 5(3):131–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun C (1994) Rule-base structure identification in an adaptive network based inference system. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2(1):64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 15:116–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Theurer FD, Voos KA, Miller WJ (1984) Instream Water Temperature Model. Instream Flow Information Paper 16, FWS/OBS-84/15. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

  • Wang L, Mendel JM (1992) Fuzzy basis functions, universal approximation, and orthogonal least squares. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(5):807–814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Genesis Power Ltd. New Zealand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoon-Seok Timothy Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, YS.T., Bhamidimarri, R. Dynamic neuro-fuzzy local modeling system with a nonlinear feature extraction for the online adaptive warning system of river temperature affected by waste cooling water discharge. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 26, 947–960 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0543-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0543-z

Keywords

Navigation