Abstract
This study investigates the behavior of flux and head in a strongly heterogeneous three-dimensional aquifer system. The analyses relied on data from 520 slug tests together with 38,000 one-foot core intervals lithological data from the site of the General Separations Area in central Savannah River Site, South Carolina, USA. The skewness in the hydraulic conductivity histograms supported the geologic information for the top two aquifers, but revealed stronger clay content, than was reported for the bottom aquifer. The log-normal distribution model described adequately the hydraulic conductivity measurements for all three aquifers although, other distributions described equally well the bottom aquifer measurements. No apparent anisotropy on the horizontal plane was found for the three aquifers, but ratios of horizontal to vertical correlation lengths between 33 and 75 indicated a strong stratification at the site. Three-dimensional Monte Carlo stochastic simulations utilized a grid with larger elements than the support volume of measurements, but of sub-REV (representative elementary volume) dimensions. This necessitated, on one hand, the use of upscaled hydraulic conductivity expressions, but on the other hand did not allow for the use of anisotropic effective hydraulic conductivity expressions (Sarris and Paleologos in J Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 18: 188–197, 2004). Flux mean and standard deviations components were evaluated on three vertical cross-sections. The mean and variance of the horizontal flux component normal to a no-flow boundary tended to zero at approximately two to three integral scales from that boundary. Close to a prescribed head boundary both the mean and variance of the horizontal flux component normal to the boundary increased from a stable value attained at a distance of about five integral scales from that boundary. The velocity field 〈qx〉 was found to be mildly anisotropic in the top two aquifers, becoming highly anisotropic in the bottom aquifer; 〈qy〉 was anisotropic in all three aquifers with directions of high continuity normal to those of the 〈qx〉 field; finally, 〈qz〉 was highly anisotropic in all three aquifers, with higher continuity along the east–west direction. The mean head field was found to be continuous, despite the high heterogeneity of the underlying hydraulic conductivity field. Directions of high continuity were in alignment with field boundaries and mean flow direction. Conditioning did not influence significantly the expected value of the flux terms, with more pronounced being the effect on the standard deviation of the flux vector components. Conditioning reduced the standard deviations of the horizontal flux components by as much as 50% in the bottom aquifer. Variability in the head cross-sections was affected only marginally, with an average 10% reduction in the respective standard deviation. Finally, the location of the conditioning data did not appear to have a significant effect on the surrounding area, with uniform reduction in standard deviations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aadland RK, Gellici JA, Thayer PA (1995) Hydrogeologic framework of west-central south Carolina, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Division Report 5, pp 200 + 47 plates
Dagan G (1989) Flow and transport in porous formations. Springer-Verlag, New York, p 465
Desbarats AJ (1988) Estimation of effective permeabilities in the lower Stevens formation of the Paloma field, San Juaquin Valley, California, SPE Reservoir Eng Nov: 1301–1307
Desbarats AJ, Srivastava RM (1991) Geostatistical characterization of groundwater flow parameters in a simulated aquifer. Water Resour Res 27(5):687–698
Faust CR, Mercer JW (1984) Evaluation of slug tests in wells containing a finite thickness skin. Water Resour Res 20(4):504–506
Fenton GA, Griffiths DV (1993) Statistics of block conductivity through a simple bounded stochastic medium. Water Resour Res 29(6):1825–1830
Flach GP, Harris MK (1999) Integrated hydrogeological modeling of the general separations area, vol 2: groundwater flow model, Westinghouse Savannah River Site Report: WSRC-TR-96-0399
Gelhar LW, Axness CL (1983) Three-dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers. Water Resour Res 19(l):161–180
Gómez-Hernández JJ (1991) A stochastic approach to the simulation of block conductivity fields conditioned upon data measured at a smaller scale, Ph.D dissertation, Department of Applied Earth Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Gómez-Hernández JJ, Gorelick SM (1989) Effective groundwater model parameter values: influence of spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity, leakance, and recharge. Water Resour Res 25(3):405–419
Harter T (2000) Application of stochastic theory in groundwater contamination risk analysis: suggestions for the consulting geologist and engineer. In: Zhang D, Winter L (eds) Theory, modeling and field investigation in hydrogeology: a special volume in honor of Shlomo P. Neuman’s 60th birthday. GSA Special Volume, pp 43–52
Hubbard JE (1984) Water budget for the SRP burial ground area, DPST-83-742 Report
Hubbard JE (1985) An update on the SRP burial ground area water balance and hydrology, DPST-85-958 Report
Journel AG, Huijbregts ChJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, London, UK
Journel AG, Gomez-Hernandez JJ (1989) Stochastic imaging of the Wilmington clastic sequence. In: 64th annual technical conference and exhibition of the society of petroleum engineers, San Antonio, TX, October 8–11, SPE 19857, pp 591–606
Law AM, Kelton WD (1982) Simulation modeling and analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York
Naff RL, Vecchia AV (1986) Stochastic analysis of three-dimensional flow in a bounded domain. Water Resour Res 22(5):695–704
Naff RL, Haley DF, Sudicky EA (1998) High-resolution Monte Carlo simulation of flow and conservative transport in heterogeneous porous media, 1. Methodology and flow results. Water Resour Res 34(4):663–677
Paleologos EK, Sarris T (2000) Upscaling of hydraulic conductivity in three-dimensional, heterogeneous, bounded formations. In: Bentley et al (eds) XIII computational methods in water resources. Balkema Pub., Rotterdam, 2, pp 743–747
Paleologos EK, Neuman SP, Tartakovsky D (1996) Effective hydraulic conductivity of bounded, strongly heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour Res 32(5):1333–1341
Paleologos EK, Sarris T, Desbarats A (2000) Numerical estimation of effective hydraulic conductivity in leaky heterogeneous aquitards, In Zhang D, Winter L (eds) Theory, modeling and field investigation in hydrogeology: a special volume in honor of Shlomo P. Neuman’s 60th birthday, GSA Special Volume, pp 119–127
Paleologos EK, Sarris T, Tolika M (2005) Integration of an analytic element model in a stochastic analysis of infiltration into a complex unconfined aquifer system. J Hydroinform 7:53–59
Parizek RR, Root RW Jr (1986) Development of a ground-water velocity model fro the Radioactive Waste Management Facility, Savannah River Plant, South Carolina, DPST-86-658 Report
Peres AMM, Onur M, Reynolds AC (1989) A new analysis procedure for determining aquifer properties from slug test data. Water Resour Res 25(7):1591–1602
Renard Ph, de Marsily G (1997) Calculating equivalent permeability: a review. Adv Water Resour 20(5–6):253–278
Rubin Y, Dagan G (1988) Stochastic analysis of boundaries effects on head spatial variability in heterogeneous aquifers, 1, constant head boundary. Water Resour Res 24(10):1689–1697
Sadler WR (1995) Groundwater model calibration and remediation well network design at the F-area seepage basins, Westinghouse Savannah River Site Report: WSRC-RP-95-237, Rev. 0
Sarris TS (2003) Stochastic analysis of flow in three-dimensional, heterogeneous, anisotropic aquifers: synthetic simulations and case study, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Geological Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, pp 173
Sarris TS, Paleologos EK (2004) Numerical investigation of the anisotropic hydraulic conductivity behavior in heterogeneous porous media. J Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 18:188–197
Smith L (1981) Spatial variability of flow parameters in a stratified sand. Math Geol 13(1):1–21
Smits AD, Harris MK, Hawkins KL, Flach GP (1997) Integrated hydrogeological modeling of the general separations area, volume 1, hydrogeologic framework (U), Westinghouse Savannah River Site Report: WSRC-TR-96-0399
Woodbury AD, Sudicky EA (1991) The geostatistical characteristics of the Borden aquifer. Water Resour Res 27(4):533–546
Zhang D (2002) Stochastic methods for flow in porous media: coping with uncertainties. Academic Press, San Diego, p 349
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Mary Harris and Dr. Greg Flach, Savannah River Site National Lab, for their helpful suggestions during the modeling phase and for providing us with the data for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paleologos, E.K., Sarris, T.S. Stochastic analysis of flux and head moments in a heterogeneous aquifer system. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25, 747–759 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0459-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0459-7