Skip to main content
Log in

How to measure stand density

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foresters have produced many measures of stand density. Yet, none of these is entirely satisfactory. A majority of the measures (stand density index, basal area, and leaf area) present number of trees per unit area as a function of one factor: average tree size. This paper identifies the second factor driving self-thinning: the accumulation of gaps between tree crowns inevitable even in dense stands with a sizeable overlap of crowns. A model accounting for both factors allows us to quantify stand density and find a single number characterizing the density of undisturbed stands. The number changes with species, being higher for more shade tolerant ones. It is found that the second factor affects survival of trees but not their growth. This means that there are two kinds of stand density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alban DH, Laidly PR (1982) Generalized biomass equations for jack and red pine in the Lake States. Can J For Res 12:913–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann E (1970) The principles of forest yield study. Pergamon, New York, p 506

  • Avery TE, Burkhart HE (2002) Forest measurements, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 456

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1996) Ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell, London

  • Bickford CA, Baker FS, Wilson FG (1957) Stocking, normality, and measurement of stand density. J For 55:99–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Briegleb PA (1952) An approach to density measurement in Douglas-fir. J For 50:529–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman HH (1953) Effects of thinning on yields of forest-grown longleaf and loblolly pines at Urania, LA. J For 51:16–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Clason TR (1994) Impact of intraspecific competition on growth and financial development of loblolly pine plantations. New For 8:185–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on standardization of volume and yield tables (1926) Methods of preparing volume and yield tables. J For 24:653–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Craib IJ (1947) The silviculture of exotic conifers in South Africa. British Empire Forestry Conference. City Printing Works, Pietermaritzburg

  • Gadow K (1986) Observations on self-thinning in pine plantations. S Afr J Sci 82:364–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich SF (1967) Measuring and evaluating stocking and stand density in upland hardwood forests in the central states. For Sci 13:38–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding RB, Grigal DF (1985) Individual tree biomass estimation equations for plantation-grown white spruce in northern Minnesota. Can J For Res 15:738–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic, New York

  • Kays S, Harper JL (1974) The regulation of plant and tiller density in a grass sward. J Ecol 62:97–105 (The key point is reprinted as Figure 10.6 in Gurevitch et al. 2002. Ecology of plants. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski TT, Kramer PJ, Pallardy SG (1991) The physiological ecology of woody plants. Academic, New York

  • Lohrey RE (1985) Aboveground biomass of planted and direct-seeded slash pine in the West Gulf Region. In: Saucier JR (ed) The 1984 southern forest biomass workshop. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Fort Collins, pp 75–82

  • MacKinney AL, Chaiken LE (1935) A method of determining density of loblolly pine stands. Technical Note No. 15. USDA Forest Service, Appalachian Forest Experiment Station, West Virginia

  • Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, New York

  • Meyer WH (1938) Yield of even-aged stands of ponderosa pine. Technical Bulletin 630. USDA, Washington

  • Meyer WH (1942) Yield of even-aged stands of loblolly pine in northern Louisiana. Bulletin 51. Yale University, School of Forestry, Yale, New Haven

  • Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest stand dynamics. Wiley, New York

  • Pfeifer P, Avnir D (1983) Chemistry in noninteger dimensions between two and three. I. Fractal theory of heterogeneous surfaces. J Chem Phys 79:3558–3564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reineke LH (1933) Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. J Agric Res 46:627–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt MDC, Grigal DF (1981) Generalized biomass estimations for Betula papyrifera Marsh. Can J For Res 11:837–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr SH (1952) Forest inventory. Ronald, New York

  • Stahelin R (1949) Thinning even-aged loblolly and slash pine stands to specified densities. J For 47:538–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Toumey JW, Korstian CF (1947) Foundations of silviculture upon an ecological basis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

  • Tursky MK (2000) Silviculture, 9th edn (in Russian). Moscow University of Forestry, Moscow

  • Vose JM, Allen HL (1988) Leaf area, stemwood growth, and nutrition relationships in loblolly pine. For Sci 34:547–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlenberg WG (1960) Loblolly pine. The School of Forestry, Duke University, Durham

  • Weller DE (1987) A reevaluation of the −3/2 power rule of self-thinning. Ecol Monogr 57:23–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger KF (ed) (1984) Forestry handbook, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

  • West PW (1982) Comparison of stand density measures in even-aged regrowth eucalypt forest of southern Tasmania. Can J For Res 13:22–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams RA (1994) Stand density management diagram for loblolly pine plantations in north Louisiana. South J Appl For 18:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams RA (1996) Stand density index for loblolly pine plantations in north Louisiana. South J Appl For 20:110–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff DR, Bond BJ, Ritchie GA, Scott W (2002) Effects of stand density on the growth of young Douglas-fir trees. Can J For Res 32:420–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoda K, Kira T, Ogawa H, Hozumi K (1963) Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. J Biol Osaka City Univ 14:107–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeide B (1985) Tolerance and self-tolerance of trees. For Ecol Manage 13:149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeide B (1987) Analysis of the 3/2 power law of self-thinning. For Sci 33:517–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeide B (1991) Self-thinning and stand density. For Sci 37:517–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeide B (1993) Analysis of growth equations. For Sci 39:591–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeide B (1995) A relationship between size of trees and their number. For Ecol Manage 72:265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeide B (1998) Fractal analysis of foliage distribution in loblolly pine crowns. Can J For Res 28:106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeide B (2000) Fractal geometry: addressing the intrinsic spatial uncertainty. In: Heuvelink GBM, Lemmens MJPM (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, July 2000, Amsterdam, pp 755–768

  • Zeide B (2004) Intrinsic units in growth modeling. Ecol Model (in press)

  • Zeide B, Pfeifer P (1991) A method for estimation of fractal dimension of tree crowns. For Sci 37:1253–1265

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Burkhart HE, Amateis RL (1996) Modeling individual tree growth for juvenile loblolly pine plantations. For Ecol Manage 89:157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I appreciate many useful comments by Jayaraman Kadiroo, Ralph Meeker, Mike Shelton, and two anonymous referees. My thanks to Dan Leduc for reviewing the manuscript and digitizing Reineke’s data. Support from the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station is appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Zeide.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeide, B. How to measure stand density. Trees 19, 1–14 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0343-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0343-x

Keywords

Navigation