Skip to main content
Log in

County socioeconomic characteristics and pediatric renal transplantation outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Existing risk adjustment models for solid organ transplantation omit socioeconomic status (SES). With limited data available on transplant candidates’ SES, linkage of transplant outcomes data to geographic SES measures has been proposed. We investigate the utility of county SES for understanding differences in pediatric kidney transplantation (KTx) outcomes.

Methods

We identified patients < 18 years of age receiving first-time KTx using United Network for Organ Sharing registry data in two eras: 2006–2010 and 2011–2015, corresponding to periods of county SES data collection. In each era, counties were ranked by 1-year rates of survival with intact graft, and by county SES score. We used Spearman correlation (ρ) to evaluate the association between county rankings on SES and transplant outcomes in each era and consistency between these measures across eras. We also evaluated the utility of county SES for improving prediction of individual KTx outcomes.

Results

The analysis included 2972 children and 108 counties. County SES and transplant outcomes were not correlated in either 2006–2010 (ρ = 0.06; p = 0.525) or 2011–2015 (ρ = 0.162, p = 0.093). County SES rankings were strongly correlated between eras (ρ = 0.99, p < 0.001), whereas county rankings of transplant outcomes were not correlated between eras (ρ = 0.16, p = 0.097). Including county SES quintile in individual-level models of transplant outcomes did not improve model predictive utility.

Conclusions

Pediatric kidney transplant outcomes are unstable from period to period at the county level and are not correlated with county-level SES. Appropriate adjustment for SES disparities in transplant outcomes could require further collection of detailed individual SES data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, Gustafson SK, Stewart DE, Cherikh WS, Wainright JL, Kucheryavaya A, Woodbury M, Snyder JJ, Kasiske BL, Israni AK (2017) OPTN/SRTR 2015 annual data report: kidney. Am J Transplant 17(Suppl 1):21–116

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Valapour M, Skeans MA, Smith JM, Edwards LB, Cherikh WS, Uccelini K, Israni AK, Snyder JJ, Kasiske BL (2017) OPTN/SRTR 2015 annual data report: lung. Am J Transplant 17(Suppl 1):357–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frequently asked questions about multiple listing and waiting time transfer (2017) United Network for Organ Sharing. Available at: https://www.unos.org/wp-content/uploads/unos/Multiple_Listing.pdf. Accessed January 15, 2018

  4. Howard RJ, Cornell DL, Schold JD (2009) CMS oversight, OPOs and transplant centers and the law of unintended consequences. Clin Transpl 23:778–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. VanWagner LB, Skaro AI (2013) Program-specific reports: implications and impact on program behavior. Curr Opin Org Transplant 18:210–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Adler NE, Newman K (2002) Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health Aff (Millwood) 21:60–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Chen J, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Parvizi J, Della Valle CJ, Hamilton WG, Nunley RM (2014) Impact of socioeconomic factors on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:86–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lasser KE, Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S (2006) Access to care, health status, and health disparities in the United States and Canada: results of a cross-national population-based survey. Am J Public Health 96:1300–1307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Schold JD, Phelan MP, Buccini LD (2017) Utility of ecological risk factors for evaluation of transplant center performance. Am J Transplant 17:617–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh TP, Naftel DC, Addonizio L, Mahle W, Foushee MT, Zangwill S, Blume ED, Kirklin JK, Singh R, Johnston JK, Chinnock R (2010) Association of race and socioeconomic position with outcomes in pediatric heart transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 10:2116–2123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans JD, Kaptoge S, Caleyachetty R, Di Angelantonio E, Lewis C, Parameshwar KJ, Pettit SJ (2016) Socioeconomic deprivation and survival after heart transplantation in England: an analysis of the United Kingdom transplant registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 9:695–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tumin D, Horan J, Shrider EA, Smith SA, Tobias JD, Jr HD, Foraker RE (2017) County socioeconomic characteristics and heart transplant outcomes in the United States. Am Heart J 190:104–112

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Press R, Carrasquillo O, Nickolas T, Radhakrishnan J, Shea S, Barr RG (2005) Race/ethnicity, poverty status, and renal transplant outcomes. Transplantation 80:917–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Subramanian SV (2005) Painting a truer picture of US socioeconomic and racial/ethnic health inequalities: the public health disparities geocoding project. Am J Public Health 95:312–323

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Data. Available at: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data—Accessed October 16, 2017

  16. United States Census Bureau: American Community Survey Data. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/data.html—Accessed October 16, 2017

  17. Diez Roux AV, Merkin SS, Arnett D, Chambless L, Massing M, Nieto FJ, Sorlie P, Szklo M, Tyroler HA, Watson RL (2001) Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 345:99–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Quillin RC 3rd, Wilson GC, Wima K, Hohmann SF, Sutton JM, Shaw JJ, Paquette IM, Woodle ES, Abbott DE, Shah SA (2014) Neighborhood level effects of socioeconomic status on liver transplant selection and recipient survival. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:1934–1941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Glance LG, Kellermann AL, Osler TM, Li Y, Li W, Dick AW (2016) Impact of risk adjustment for socioeconomic status on risk-adjusted surgical readmission rates. Ann Surg 263:698–704

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Patzer RE, Amaral S, Wasse H, Volkova N, Kleinbaum D, McClellan WM (2009) Neighborhood poverty and racial disparities in kidney transplant waitlisting. J Am Soc Nephrol 20:1333–1340

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Schold JD, Heaphy EL, Buccini LD, Poggio ED, Srinivas TR, Goldfarb DA, Flechner SM, Rodrigue JR, Thornton JD, Sehgal AR (2013) Prominent impact of community risk factors on kidney transplant candidate processes and outcomes. Am J Transplant 13:2374–2383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cao B, Adler JT, Bababekov YJ, Markmann JF, Chang DC, Yeh H (2018) Pediatric kidney transplantation and mortality: distance to transplant center matters. Pediatr Transplant. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13120

  23. Begaj I, Khosla S, Ray D, Sharif A (2013) Socioeconomic deprivation is independently associated with mortality post kidney transplantation. Kidney Int 84:803–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stephens MR, Evans M, Ilham MA, Marsden A, Asderakis A (2010) The influence of socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes following renal transplantation in the United Kingdom. Am J Transplant 10:1605–1612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ward FL, O’Kelly P, Donohue F, ÓhAiseadha C, Haase T, Pratschke J, deFreitas DG, Johnson H, Conlon PJ, O’Seaghdha CM (2015) Influence of socioeconomic status on allograft and patient survival following kidney transplantation. Nephrology (Carlton) 20:426–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aitken E, Dempster N, Ceresa C, Daly C, Kingsmore D (2013) The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes following renal transplantation in the West of Scotland. Transplant Proc 45:2176–2183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Laging M, Kal-van Gestel JA, van de Wetering J, IJzermans JN, Weimar W, Roodnat JI (2014) Understanding the influence of ethnicity and socioeconomic factors on graft and patient survival after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 98:974–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV, Carson R (2002) Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol 156:471–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. DeJong NA, Wood CT, Morreale MC, Ellis C, Davis D, Fernandez J, Steiner MJ (2016) Identifying social determinants of health and legal needs for children with special health care needs. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 55:272–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Patel M, Bathory E, Scholnick J, White-Davis T, Choi J, Braganza S (2017) Resident documentation of social determinants of health: effects of a teaching tool in the outpatient setting. Clin Pediatr (Phila). https://doi.org/10.1177/000992281772869

  31. Using social determinants of health data to improve health care and health: a learning report. Health Leads USA. Available at: https://healthleadsusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/RWJF-SDOH-Learning-Report.pdf—Accessed November 29, 2017

  32. Screening for social determinants of health: two member experiences. Children’s Hospital Association. Available at: https://www.childrenshospitals.org/events/2016/04/14/screening-for-social-determinants-of-health-two-member-experiences—Accessed November 29, 2017

  33. Peterson, EE (2017) Screening families for unmet social needs in a pediatric clinic. Wright State University

  34. Isaacs R (2004) Ethical implications of ethnic disparities in chronic kidney disease and kidney transplantation. Adv Ren Replace Ther 11:55–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Johansen KL, Zhang R, Huang Y, Patzer RE, Kutner NG (2012) Association of race and insurance type with delayed assessment for kidney transplantation among patients initiating dialysis in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7:1490–1497

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Epstein AM, Ayanian JZ, Keogh JH, Noonan SJ, Armistead N, Clearly PD, Weissman JS, David-Kasdan JA, Carlson D, Fuller J, Marsh D, Conti RM (2000) Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation—clinically appropriate or due to underuse or overuse? N Engl J Med 343:1537–1544

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Allmon AL, Shaw K, Martens JL, Yamada TH, Lohngberg JA, Schultz JM, Tallman BA, Altmaier EM (2010) Organ transplantation: issues in assessment and treatment. The Register Report

  38. Laurentine KA, Bramstedt KA (2010) Too poor for transplant: finance and insurance issues in transplant ethics. Prog Transplant 20:178–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schaffer RL 3rd, Kulkarni S, Harper A, Millis JM, Cronin DC 2nd (2003) The sickest first? Disparities with model for end-stage liver disease-based organ allocation: one region’s experience. Liver Transpl 9:1211–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Trotter JF, Osgood MJ (2004) MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes. JAMA 291:1871–1874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Barshes NR, Becker NS, Washburn WK, Halff GA, Aloia TA, Goss JA (2007) Geographic disparities in deceased donor liver transplantation within a single UNOS region. Liver Transpl 13:747–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. (1996) Pretending to be poor. The New York Times

  43. Lieber R (2017) The ethics of adjusting your assets to qualify for Medicaid. The New York Times

  44. (2005) Medicaid for millionaires. The Wall Street Journal

  45. Tumin D, Foraker RE, Smith S, Tobias JD, Hayes D Jr (2016) Health insurance trajectories and long-term survival after heart transplantation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 9:576–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Schlansky B, Shachar C (2016) Implications of expanded medicaid eligibility for patient outcomes after liver transplantation: Caveat emptor. Liver Transpl 22:1062–1064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Foraker RE, Tumin D, Smith S, Tobias JD, Hayes D Jr (2016) Insurance status by region at the time of heart transplantation: implications for survival. J Heart Lung Transplant 35:1480–1486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Miller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The data reported here have been supplied by the United Network for Organ Sharing as the contractor for the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the author(s) and in no way should be seen as an official policy of or interpretation by the OPTN or the US Government.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, R., Akateh, C., Thompson, N. et al. County socioeconomic characteristics and pediatric renal transplantation outcomes. Pediatr Nephrol 33, 1227–1234 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-018-3928-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-018-3928-0

Keywords

Navigation