Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical features and outcomes of 98 children and adults with dense deposit disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Dense deposit disease (DDD) is an ultra-rare renal disease.

Methods

In the study reported here, 98 patients and their families participated in a descriptive patient-centered survey using an online research format. Reports were completed by patients (38%) or their parents (62%). Age at diagnosis ranged from 1.9 to 38.9 years (mean 14 years).

Results

The majority of patients presented with proteinuria and hematuria; 50% had hypertension and edema. Steroids were commonly prescribed, although their use was not evidence-based. One-half of the patients with DDD for 10 years progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), with young females having the greatest risk for renal failure. Of first allografts, 45% failed within 5 years, most frequently due to recurrent disease (70%). Type 1 diabetes (T1D) was present in over 16% of families, which represents a 116-fold increase in incidence compared with the general population (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Based on these findings, we suggest that initiatives are needed to explore the high incidence of T1D in family members of DDD patients and the greater risk for progression to ESRD in young females with DDD. These efforts must be supported by sufficient numbers of patients to establish evidence-based practice guidelines for disease management. An international collaborative research survey should be implemented to encourage broad access and participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nasr S, Valeri A, Appel GB, Sherwinter J, Stokes MB, Said SM, Markowitz GS, D'Agati VD (2009) Dense deposit disease: clinicopathologic study of 32 pediatric and adult patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:22–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Strobel S, Zimmering M, Papp K, Prechl J, Jozsi M (2010) Anti-factor B autoantibody in dense deposit disease. Mol Immunol 47:1476–1483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Walker PD, Ferrario F, Joh K, Bonsib SM (2007) Dense deposit disease is not a membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Mod Pathol 20:605–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith RJ, Alexander J, Barlow PN, Botto M, Cassavant TL, Cook HT, de Córdoba SR, Hageman GS, Jokiranta TS, Kimberling WJ, Lambris JD, Lanning LD, Levidiotis V, Licht C, Lutz HU, Meri S, Pickering MC, Quigg RJ, Rops AL, Salant DJ, Sethi S, Thurman JM, Tully HF, Tully SP, van der Vlag J, Walker PD, Würzner R, Zipfel PF; Dense Deposit Disease Focus Group (2007) New approaches to the treatment of dense deposit disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 18:2447–2456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith RJ, Harris CL, Pickering MC (2011) Dense deposit disease. Mol Immunol 48:1604–1610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sethi S, Fervenza FC, Zhang Y, Nasr SH, Leung N, Vrana J, Cramer C, Nester CM, Smith RJ (2011) Proliferative glomerulonephritis secondary to dysfunction of the alternative pathway of complement. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6:1009–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Appel GB, Cook HT, Hageman G, Jennette JC, Kashgarian M, Kirschfink M, Lambris JD, Lanning L, Lutz HU, Meri S, Rose NR, Salant DJ, Sethi S, Smith RJ, Smoyer W, Tully HF, Tully SP, Walker P, Welsh M, Würzner R, Zipfel PF (2005) Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II (dense deposit disease): an update. J Am Soc Nephrol 16:1392–1403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Public law 107–280 (2002) Rare Diseases Act of 2002. Public law 107–280. Available at: http://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/PL107-280.pdf

  9. Misra A, Peethambaram A, Garg A (2004) Clinical features and metabolic and autoimmune derangements in acquired partial lipodystrophy: report of 35 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 83:18–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D'souza YB, Jones CJ, Short CD, Roberts IS, Bonshek RE (2009) Oligosaccharide composition is similar in drusen and dense deposits in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II. Kidney Int 75:824–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith RJH, Sethi S, Zipfel PF (2011) Dense deposit disease/membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II. Available at: http://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/PL107-280.pdf. Updated 2011. Accessed 2 July 2011

  12. Pickering MC, Warren J, Rose KL, Carlucci F, Wang Y, Walport MJ, Cook HT, Botto M (2006) Prevention of C5 activation ameliorates spontaneous and experimental glomerulonephritis in factor H-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9649–9654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ponticelli C, Glassock RJ (1997) Treatment of Primary Glomerulonephritis, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cameron JS, Turner DR, Heaton J, Williams DG, Ogg CS, Chantler C, Haycock GB, Hicks J (1983) Idiopathic mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis. Comparison of types I and II in children and adults and long-term prognosis Am J Med 74:175–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu JC, Yang JY, Xiao HJ, Huang JP, Yao Y, Li X, Wang SX (2009) Clinical and pathological characteristics of children with dense deposit disease. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 47:593–597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cansick JC, Lennon R, Cummins CL, Howie AJ, McGraw ME, Saleem MA, Tizard EJ, Hulton SA, Milford DV, Taylor CM (2004) Prognosis, treatment and outcome of childhood mesangiocapillary (membranoproliferative) glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19:2769–2777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu DF, McCarthy AM, Lanning LD, Delaney C, Porter C (2007) A descriptive study of individuals with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Nurs J 34:295–302, quiz 303

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Little MA, Dupont P, Campbell E, Dorman A, Walshe JJ (2006) Severity of primary MPGN, rather than MPGN type, determines renal survival and post-transplantation recurrence risk. Kidney Int 69:504–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwertz R, de Jong R, Gretz N, Kirschfink M, Anders D, Scharer K (1996) Outcome of idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in children. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Pädiatrische Nephrologie. Acta Paediatr 85:308–312

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Braun MC, Stablein DM, Hamiwka LA, Bell L, Bartosh SM, Strife CF (2005) Recurrence of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II in renal allografts: The North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study experience. J Am Soc Nephrol 16:2225–2233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dizdar O, Kahraman S, Gençtoy G, Ertoy D, Arici M, Altun B, Yasavul U, Turgan C (2004) Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis associated with type 1 diabetes mellitus and Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19:988–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Srikanta S, Malaviya AN, Rajagopalan P, Bhuyan UN, Ahuja MM (1983) Association of type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, autoimmunity, antinuclear antibody, and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Diabetes Care 6:71–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heinig M, Petretto E, Wallace C, Bottolo L, Rotival M, Lu H, Li Y, Sarwar R, Langley SR, Bauerfeind A, Hummel O, Lee YA, Paskas S, Rintisch C, Saar K, Cooper J, Buchan R, Gray EE, Cyster JG; Cardiogenics Consortium, Erdmann J, Hengstenberg C, Maouche S, Ouwehand WH, Rice CM, Samani NJ, Schunkert H, Goodall AH, Schulz H, Roider HG, Vingron M, Blankenberg S, Münzel T, Zeller T, Szymczak S, Ziegler A, Tiret L, Smyth DJ, Pravenec M, Aitman TJ, Cambien F, Clayton D, Todd JA, Hubner N, Cook SA (2010) A trans-acting locus regulates an anti-viral expression network and type 1 diabetes risk. Nature 467:460–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Holcomb CL, Hoglund B, Anderson MW, Blake LA, Böhme I, Egholm M, Ferriola D, Gabriel C, Gelber SE, Goodridge D, Hawbecker S, Klein R, Ladner M, Lind C, Monos D, Pando MJ, Pröll J, Sayer DC, Schmitz-Agheguian G, Simen BB, Thiele B, Trachtenberg EA, Tyan DB, Wassmuth R, White S, Erlich HA (2011) A multi-site study using high-resolution HLA genotyping by next generation sequencing. Tissue Antigens 77:206–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Leung AK, Wong AH (2010) Proteinuria in children. Am Fam Physician 82:645–651

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kalaitzidis R, Bakris GL (2009) Effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers on diabetic nephropathy. J Hypertens Suppl 27:S15–S21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Galle J (2008) Reduction of proteinuria with angiotensin receptor blockers. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 5[Suppl 1]:S36–S43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Alchi B, Jayne D (2010) Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Pediatr Nephrol 25:1409–1418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Donadio JV Jr, Offord KP (1989) Reassessment of treatment results in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, with emphasis on life-table analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 14:445–451

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. West CD (1992) Idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in childhood. Pediatr Nephrol 6:96–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shaw AC, Joshi S, Greenwood H, Panda A, Lord JM (2010) Aging of the innate immune system. Curr Opin Immunol 22:507–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gameiro C, Romao F (2010) Changes in the immune system during menopause and aging. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2:1299–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gonzalez DA, Diaz BB, Rodriguez Perez Mdel C, Hernandez AG, Chico BN, de Leon AC (2010) Sex hormones and autoimmunity. Immunol Lett 133:6–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Riaño-Galán I, Málaga S, Rajmil L, Ariceta G, Navarro M, Loris C, Vallo A (2009) Quality of life of adolescents with end-stage renal disease and kidney transplant. Pediatr Nephrol 24:1561–1568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pradel FG, Jain R, Mullins CD, Vassalotti JA, Bartlett ST (2008) A survey of nephrologists’ views on preemptive transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:1837–1845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Boehm M, Winkelmayer WC, Arbeiter K, Mueller T, Aufricht C (2010) Late referral to paediatric renal failure service impairs access to pre-emptive kidney transplantation in children. Arch Dis Child 95:634–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Davis CL (2010) Preemptive transplantation and the transplant first initiative. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 19:592–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. U.S. Renal Data System (2009) USRDS 2009 annual data report: atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States. National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda

  39. American Academy of Pediatrics. Recommendations for preventive pediatric health care. Available at: http://brightfutures.aap.org/pdfs/AAP%20Bright%20Futures%20Periodicity%20Sched%20101107.pdf. Updated 2008. Accessed 12 Aug 2011

  40. Iitaka K, Igarashi S, Sakai T (1994) Hypocomplementaemia and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in school urinary screening in Japan. Pediatr Nephrol 8:420–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Putkowski S (2010) The National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD): providing advocacy for people with rare disorders. NASN School Nurse 25:38–41. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=jlh&AN=2010524084&site=ehost-live

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the generous support from the University of Iowa Information Technology Service, Research Service. Mr. Timothy VanFosson developed the online research survey platform. This work was supported in part by NIH grant DK074409 to RJHS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Der-Fa Lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, DF., Moon, M., Lanning, L.D. et al. Clinical features and outcomes of 98 children and adults with dense deposit disease. Pediatr Nephrol 27, 773–781 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-011-2059-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-011-2059-7

Keywords

Navigation