Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability of renal ultrasound measurements in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the investigation reported here was to assess the intraobserver and interobserver variability of renal measurements in children. The study comprised 56 paired measurements in 28 children (median age 7.5 years, range 3.0–15.0 years) without renal or ureterovesical anomalies. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was assessed by repeated measurements of the left and right renal length, width, and thickness. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Bland and Altman plots were computed to assess the agreement of the measurements. Limits of agreement ± 2 standard deviations (SD) for the mean differences in renal measurements were derived. Intraobserver ICCs ranged from 0.93 (left and right renal width and right renal thickness) to 0.99 (left renal length), and interobserver ICCs ranged from 0.64 (right renal thickness) to 0.90 (right renal length). Limits of agreement in the Bland and Altman plots ranged from −8.0 to 9.2% (intraobserver left renal width) to the widest limit from −18.0 to 19.2% (interobserver left renal length). Overall, this study demonstrated the good reproducibility and agreement of most renal dimensions in children measured by ultrasound (US). Based on these results, we conclude that US is an appropriate measure to assess renal dimensions in both clinical and epidemiological studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoy WE, Rees M, Kile E, Mathews JD, McCredie DA, Pugsley DJ, Wang Z (1998) Low birthweight and renal disease in Australian aborigines. Lancet 352:1826–1827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Geelhoed JJ, Verburg BO, Nauta J, Lequin M, Hofman A, Moll HA, Witteman JC, van der Heijden AJ, Steegers EA, Jaddoe VW (2009) Tracking and determinants of kidney size from fetal life until the age of 2 years: The Generation R Study. Am J Kidney Dis 53:248–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner BM, Chertow GM (1994) Congenital oligonephropathy and the etiology of adult hypertension and progressive renal injury. Am J Kidney Dis 23:171–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Edell SL Kurtz AB, Rifkin MD (1990) Normal renal ultrasound measurements. In: Goldberg BB, Kurtz AB (eds) Atlas of ultrasound measurements. Year book Medical Publishers, Chicago, pp 146–160

  5. Bakker J, Olree M, Kaatee R, de Lange EE, Moons KG, Beutler JJ, Beek FJ (1999) Renal volume measurements: accuracy and repeatability of US compared with that of MR imaging. Radiology 211:623–628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sargent MA, Long G, Karmali M, Cheng SM (1997) Interobserver variation in the sonographic estimation of renal volume in children. Pediatr Radiol 27:663–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sargent MA, Wilson BP (1992) Observer variability in the sonographic measurement of renal length in childhood. Clin Radiol 46:344–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schlesinger AE, Hernandez RJ, Zerin JM, Marks TI, Kelsch RC (1991) Interobserver and intraobserver variations in sonographic renal length measurements in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:1029–1032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeanty P, Dramaix-Wilmet M, Elkhazen N, Hubinont C, van Regemorter N (1982) Measurements of fetal kidney growth on ultrasound. Radiology 144:159–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta AK, Anand NK, Lamba IM (1993) Ultrasound evaluation of kidney dimensions in neonates. Indian Pediatr 30:319–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bland JM, Altman DG (2003) Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:85–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones TB, Riddick LR, Harpen MD, Dubuisson RL, Samuels D (1983) Ultrasonographic determination of renal mass and renal volume. J Ultrasound Med 2:151–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moskowitz PS, Carroll BA, McCoy JM (1980) Ultrasonic renal volumetry in children: accuracy and simplicity of the method. Radiology 134:61–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ablett MJ, Coulthard A, Lee RE, Richardson DL, Bellas T, Owen JP, Keir MJ, Butler TJ (1995) How reliable are ultrasound measurements of renal length in adults. Br J Radiol 68:1087–1089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Emamian SA, Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF (1995) Intraobserver and interobserver variations in sonographic measurements of kidney size in adult volunteers. A comparison of linear measurements and volumetric estimates. Acta Radiol 36:399–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the departments of Epidemiology and Pediatrics of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Disclosures

We have no personal or financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent W. V. Jaddoe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geelhoed, J.J.M., Kleyburg-Linkers, V.E., Snijders, S.P.E. et al. Reliability of renal ultrasound measurements in children. Pediatr Nephrol 24, 1345–1353 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-009-1148-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-009-1148-3

Keywords

Navigation