Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Premedication during micturating cystourethrogram to achieve sedation and anxiolysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Micturating cystourethrogram (MCUG) is an imaging technique indicated in the diagnosis and follow-up of many diseases. We investigated the reliability and the efficacy of midazolam and chloral hydrate in sedation and anxiolysis during micturating cystourethrogram. Fifty-three children of similar ages (39 girls, 14 boys, mean age of 5.8±3.5 years) were randomized to midazolam (n=17), chloral hydrate (n=18) and control groups (n=18). Oral midazolam 0.6 mg/kg or chloral hydrate 25 mg/kg or saline were administered to the study groups 15–30 min prior to the urinary catheterization. Brietkopf and Buttner, Frankl and Houpt scales and Spielberger’s State Anxiety Inventory and parent’s impressions were used to assess the level of sedation and anxiety. The Brietkopf and Buttner classification of emotional status and Houpt behavior rating scale demonstrated a significantly better emotional status and sedation in the midazolam group when compared to controls (P=0.01 and P=0.018, respectively). The catheterization was described as a more unpleasant and distressing event by the parents of the control and the chloral hydrate groups when compared to the parents of the midazolam group (P<0.05). Bladder capacity and frequency of detection of residual urine were not statistically different between the three study groups (P>0.05). Vital signs did not change significantly in any child. Sedation with midazolam does not have adverse effects on the results of micturating cystourethrogram, while it reduces the discomfort in children undergoing this radiological technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gordon I, Bruyn RD (1999) Diagnostic imaging. In: Barratt TM, Avner ED, Harmon WE (eds) Pediatric nephrology. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 377–390

  2. Hellström M, Jacobson B (1999) Diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux. Acta Paediatr [Suppl] 431:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  3. Phillips D, Watson AR, Collier J (1996) Distress and radiological investigations of the urinary tract in children. Eur J Pediatr 155:684–687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Phillips DA, Watson AR, MacKinlay D (1998) Distress and the micturating cystourethrogram: does preparation help? Acta Paediatr 87:175–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Elder JS, Longenecker R (1995) Premedication with oral midazolam for voiding cystourethrography in children: safety and efficacy. AJR 164:1229–1232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stokland E, Andreasson S, Jacobsson B, Jodal U, Ljung B (2003) Sedation with midazolam for voiding cystourethrography in children: a randomized double-blind study. Pediatr Radiol 33:247–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ljungman G, Kreuger A, Andréasson S, Gordh T, Sorensen S (2000) Midazolam nasal spray reduces procedural anxiety in children. Pediatrics 105:73–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson KE, Welbury RR, Girdler NM (2002) A randomised, controlled, crossover trial of oral midazolam and nitrous oxide for paediatric dental sedation. Anaesthesia 57:860–867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coskun S, Yuksel H, Onag A (2001) Chloral hydrate in children undergoing echocardiography. Ind J Pediatr 68:319–322

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Agostino J, Tendrup TE (2000) Chloral hydrate versus midazolam for sedation of children for neuroimaging: A randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Emerg Care 16:1–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper J, Jobling D, Edmunds DH (1978) Sedation for minor oral surgery: inhalation sedation with 25 per cent nitrous oxide. J Dent 6:265–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hosey MT, Blinkhorn AS (1995) An evaluation of four methods of assessing the behaviour of anxious child dental patients. Int J Paediatr Dent 5:87–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spielberger CD, Lushene RE. Gorsuch RL, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA (1983). State-trait anxiety inventory (professional manual). Mind Garden Inc, Redwood City, CA

  14. Robinson M, Savage J, Stewart M, Sweeney L (1999) The diagnostic value, parental and patient acceptability of micturating cysto-urethrography in children. Ir Med J 92:366–368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmit P, Sfez M (1997) Management of anxious and painful manifestations in pediatric uroradiology. J Radiol 78:367–372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stephens BK, Barkey ME, Hall HR (1999) Techniques to comfort children during stressful procedures. Accid Emerg Nurs 7:226–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bozkurt P, Kilic N, Kaya G, Yeker Y, Elicevik M, Soylet Y (1996) The effects of intranasal midazolam on urodynamic studies in children. Br J Urol 78:282–286

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ipek Akil.

Additional information

This paper was presented as an oral poster at the Thirteenth Congress of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akil, I., Ozkol, M., Ikizoglu, O.Y. et al. Premedication during micturating cystourethrogram to achieve sedation and anxiolysis. Pediatr Nephrol 20, 1106–1110 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-005-1874-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-005-1874-0

Keywords

Navigation