Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urinary diversion in children and adolescents with neurogenic bladder: the Mainz experience

Part I: Bladder augmentation and bladder substitution – therapeutic algorisms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After the failure of conservative treatment of neurogenic bladders (deterioration of the upper urinary tract/incontinence), bladder augmentation/bladder substitution and supravesical urinary diversion have to be considered. In our concept, bladder augmentation is indicated for hyperreflexive and small low compliance bladders with normal upper urinary tracts. In cases with combined sphincteric incompetence, a fascial sling (FS) can be required to achieve continence. In patients with small and hyperreflexive bladders, high-grade reflux and/or dilatation of the upper tracts, bladder substitution and ureteral reimplantation are appropriate. For patients with irreparable sphincter defects and those who are unable to perform transurethral self-catheterization, continent cutaneous diversion is offered. For patients with chronic renal failure, deterioration of the upper urinary tract and those who are not able to perform a self-catheterization of a continent stoma, colonic conduit diversion is our therapy of choice. The current study aims to investigate the long-term safety of our concept for these patients in regard to protecting the upper tracts and providing continence. Between 1968 and 2002, 170 children and adolescents underwent surgery. Of these, 24 received an orthotopic reservoir (bladder augmentation, n =10; combined with FS, n =1; orthotopic bladder substitution with ureteral reimplantation, n =14). The material, methods and results of the remaining 146 patients are reported in parts II and III. One of the 24 patients with an orthotopic reservoir was lost to follow-up. An average follow-up of 9 years (1.3–18 years; median 8.7 years) was available in 23 patients with 42 RUs. As compared to preoperatively, the upper urinary tracts remained stable or improved in all ten patients with bladder augmentation and in 20/23 renal units (RUs) with bladder substitution at the latest follow-up. Eight of ten patients with bladder augmentation are continent. All 13 patients with bladder substitution are continent during the day; one requires a safety pad at night. Bladder augmentation has been effective in patients with hyperreflexive and small low compliance bladders and normal upper urinary tracts. In those with high-grade reflux and/or dilatation of the upper tracts, bladder substitution and ureteral reimplantation are recommended. In very selected patients a fascial sling (FS) can be required to achieve continence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thon WF, Denil J, Stief CG, Jonas U (1994) Urologische Langzeitbetreuung von Patienten mit Meningomyelozele. Akt Urol 25:55–76

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hunt GM, Poulton A (1995) Open spina bifida: A complete cohort reviewed 25 years after closure. Dev Med Child Neurol 37:19–29

    Google Scholar 

  3. Börjeson M-C, Lagergren J (1990) Live conditions of adolescents with myelomenigocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 32:698–706

    Google Scholar 

  4. Herschorn S, Hewitt RJ (1998) Patients perspective of long-term outcome of augmentation cystoplasty for neurogenic bladders. Urology 52:672–678

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufman AM, Ritchey ML, Delbert AC, Rudy DC, McGuire EJ (1996) Decreased bladder compliance in patients with myelomenigocele treated with radiological observation. J Urol 156:2031–2033

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez R, Sidi AA (1985) Preoperative prediction of continence after enterocystoplasty or undiversion in children with neurogenic bladder. J Urol 134:705–707

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stein R, Fisch M, Ermert A, Schwarz M, Black P, Filipas D, Hohenfellner R (2000) Urinary diversion and orthotopic bladder substitution in children and young adults with neurogenic bladder: a safe option for treatment? J Urol 163:568–573

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edelstein RA, Bauer SB, Kelly MD, Darbey MM, Peters CA, Atala A, Mandell J, Colodny AH, Retik AB (1995) The long-term urological response of neonates with myelodysplasia treated proactively with intermittent catheterization and anticholinergic theraphy. J Urol 154:1500–1504

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kasabian NG, Bauer SB, Dyro FM, Colodny AH, Mandell J, Retik AB (1992) The prophylactic value of clean intermittent catheterization and anticholinergic medication in newborns and infants with myelodysplasia at risk of developing urinary tract deterioration. Am J Dis Child 146:840–843

    Google Scholar 

  10. de Jong TP, de Vries SH, Dik P, deJjong-de Vos van Steenwiik CC, van Gool JD (2002) Renal scarring in 146 spina bifida patients treated with CIC and oxybutynin from birth on. Presented at the AAP 2002 in Boston, Podium presentation no. 31

  11. Reiner I, Jones M, Donnell S, Rickwood AM (1992) Incidence of normal micturition in myelomeningocele patients. Arch Dis Child 67:640–641

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ottolini MC, Shaer CM, Rushton HG, Majd M, Gonzales EC, Patel KM (1995) Relationship of asymptomatic bacteriuria and renal scarring in children with neurogenic bladders who are practicing clean intermittent catheterization. J Ped 127:368–372

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rink RC, Hollensbe D, Adams MC (1995) Complications of bladder augmentation in children and comparision of gastrointestinal segments. AUA Update series XIV:122–128

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalez R, Merino FG, Vaughn M (1995) Long-term results of the artificial sphincter in male patients with neurogenic bladders. J Urol 154:769–770

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grein U, Schreiter F (1990) Le sphincter artificiel chez l‘enfant. J Urol 2:93

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kryger JV, Gonzalez R, Barthold JS (2000) Surgical management of urinary incontinence in children with neurogenic sphincteric incompetence. J Urol 163:256–263

    Google Scholar 

  17. Blyth B, Ewalt DH, Duckett JW, Snyder III HM (1992) Lithogenic properties of enterocystoplasty. J Urol 148:575–577

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hendren WH, Hendren RB (1990) Bladder augmentation: experience with 129 children and young adults. J Urol 144:445–453; discussion 460

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kronner KM, Casale AJ, Cain MP, Zerin MJ, Keating MA, Rink RC (1998) Bladder calculi in the pediatric augmented bladder. J Urol 160:1096–1098; discussion 1103.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bauer SB, Hendren WH, Kozakewich H, Maloney S, Colodny AH, Mandell J, Retik AB (1992) Perforation of the augmented bladder. J Urol 148:699–703

    Google Scholar 

  21. Husmann OA, Cain MP (2001) Fecal and urinary continence after ileal cecal cystoplasty for the neurogenic bladder. J Urol 165:922–925

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abol EH, Ghoneim MA (1994) A novel uretero-ileal reimplantation technique: the serous lined extramural tunnel. A preliminary report. J Urol 151:1193–1197

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA (2001) Functional results of orthotopic ileal neobladder with serous-lined extramural ureteral reimplantation: experience with 450 patients. J Urol 165:1427–1432

    Google Scholar 

  24. Helal M, Pow-Sang J, Sanford E, Figueroa E, Lockhart J (1993) Direct (nontunneled) ureterocolonic reimplantation in association with continent reservoirs. J Urol 150:835–837

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pantuck AJ, Han KR, Perrotti M, Weiss RE, Cummings KB (2000) Ureteroenteric anastomosis in continent urinary diversion: long-term results and complications of direct versus nonrefluxing techniques. J Urol 163:450–455

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hohenfellner R, Black P, Leissner J, Allhoff EP (2002) Refluxing ureterointestinal anastomosis for continent cutaneous urinary diversion. J Urol 168:1013–1016; discussion 1016–1017

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raimund Stein.

Additional information

This paper was presented at the AAP 2002 in Boston, Mass., USA

Part II of the article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00467-005-1848-2 and Part III at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00467-005-1849-1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stein, R., Wiesner, C., Beetz, R. et al. Urinary diversion in children and adolescents with neurogenic bladder: the Mainz experience . Pediatr Nephrol 20, 920–925 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-005-1847-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-005-1847-3

Keywords

Navigation