Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How are hypertensive children evaluated and managed? A survey of North American pediatric nephrologists

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess how children with hypertension are currently evaluated and managed, we surveyed 438 North American pediatric nephrologists on how they measure blood pressure (BP), BP goals used in pharmacologically treated patients, and antihypertensive drug choices. 190 replies were received (43% response rate), and 185 were analyzable. Oscillometric and aneroid sphygmomanometers were the most commonly used devices for office BP measurement (74.8% of respondents). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was used by 63% of respondents. Goal BP in pharmacologically treated patients was set at the 95th percentile by 39% of respondents, and at the 90th percentile by 59%. Only 37% used a different goal BP in children with hypertension and renal disease; of these, 85% used a lower goal and 15% a higher goal. For hypertensive children with diabetes, 47% used a different goal; 99% lower and 1% higher. Whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and calcium-channel blockers (CCB) were chosen by similar proportions of respondents as initial agents for treatment of primary hypertension, most (84%) chose ACEI as their initial agent for hypertension in children with renal disease.

Although most pediatric nephrologists treat hypertensive children to a BP goal below the 90th percentile, most do not use lower goals for patients with renal disease or diabetes, in contrast with current recommendations for treatment of adults with these conditions. These findings highlight the need for further studies to determine whether recommendations for treatment of hypertension in adults should be followed in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3 a
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents (1967) Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension: results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg. JAMA 202:1028–1034

    Google Scholar 

  2. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents (1970) Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension: II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg. JAMA 213:1143–1152

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. (2003) The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA 289:2560–2572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bakris GL, Williams M, Dworkin L, Elliot WJ, Epstein M, Toto R, Tuttle K, Douglas J, Hsueh W, Sowers J (2000) Preserving renal function in adults with hypertension and diabetes: A consensus approach. Am J Kidney Dis 36:646–661

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (1987) Report of the second task force on blood pressure control in children—1987. Pediatrics 79:1–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents (1996) Update on the 1987 task force report on high blood pressure in children and adolescents: a working group report from the national high blood pressure education program. Pediatrics 98:649–658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sorof JM, Portman RJ (2001) Ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Curr Opin Pediatr 13:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flynn JT (2001) What’s new in pediatric hypertension? Curr Hypertens Rep 3:503–510

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sakarcan A, Tenney F, Wilson JT, Stewart JJ, Adcock KG, Wells TG, Vachharajani NN, Hadjilambris OW, Slugg P, Ford NF, Marino MR. (2001) The pharmacokinetics of irbesartan in hypertensive children and adolescents. J Clin Pharmacol 41:742–749

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wells T, Frame V, Soffer B, Shaw W, Zhang Z, Herrera P, Shahinfar S; Enalapril Pediatric Hypertension Collaborative Study Group (2002) A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of the effectiveness and safety of enalapril for children with hypertension. J Clin Pharmacol 42:870–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Trachtman H, Frank R, Mahan JD, Portman R, Restaino I, Matoo TJ, Tou C, Kilbaner M (2003) Clinical trial of extended-release felodipine in pediatric essential hypertension. Pediatr Nephrol 18:548–553

    Google Scholar 

  12. Flynn JT (2003) Successes and shortcomings of the FDA modernization act. Am J Hypertens 16:889–891

    Google Scholar 

  13. O’Brien E (2003) Demise of the mercury sphygmomanometer and the dawning of a new era in blood pressure measurement. Blood Press Monit 8:19–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufmann MA, Pargger H, Drop LJ (1996) Oscillometric blood pressure measurements by different devices are not interchangeable. Anesth Analg 82:377–381

    Google Scholar 

  15. Butani L, Morgenstern BZ (2003) Are pitfalls of oscillometric blood pressure measurements preventable in children? Pediatr Nephrol 18:313–318

    Google Scholar 

  16. Canzanello VJ, Jensen PL, Schwartz GL (2001) Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings? Arch Intern Med 161:729–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lurbe E, Sorof JM, Daniels SR (2004) Clinical and research aspects of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children. J Pediatr 144:7–16

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bald M, Hoyer PF (2001) Measurement of blood pressure at home: survey among pediatric nephrologists. Pediatr Nephrol 16:1058–1062

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mansoor GA (2003) A practical approach to persistent elevation of blood pressure in the hypertension clinic. Blood Press Monit 8:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  20. Staessen JA, Den Hond E, Celis H, Fagard R, Keary L, Vandenhoven G, O’Brien ET; Treatment of Hypertension Based on Home or Office Blood Pressure (THOP) Trial Investigators (2004) Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician’s office: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291:955–964

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wuhl E, Hadtstein C, Mehls O, Schaefer F; Escape Trial Group (2004) Home, clinic, and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children with chronic renal failure. Pediatr Res 55:492–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Soergel M, Verho M, Wuhl E, Gellermann J, Teichert L, Scharer K (2000) Effect of ramipril on ambulatory blood pressure and albuminuria in renal hypertension. Pediatr Nephrol 15:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  23. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents (2004) The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 114(2 Suppl 4th Report):555–576

    Google Scholar 

  24. ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group (2002) Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs. diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 288:2981–2997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph T. Flynn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woroniecki, R.P., Flynn, J.T. How are hypertensive children evaluated and managed? A survey of North American pediatric nephrologists. Pediatr Nephrol 20, 791–797 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-004-1804-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-004-1804-6

Keywords

Navigation