Skip to main content
Log in

Solvers for large-displacement fluid–structure interaction problems: segregated versus monolithic approaches

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compare the relative performance of monolithic and segregated (partitioned) solvers for large- displacement fluid–structure interaction (FSI) problems within the framework of oomph-lib, the object-oriented multi-physics finite-element library, available as open-source software at http://www.oomph-lib.org. Monolithic solvers are widely acknowledged to be more robust than their segregated counterparts, but are believed to be too expensive for use in large-scale problems. We demonstrate that monolithic solvers are competitive even for problems in which the fluid–solid coupling is weak and, hence, the segregated solvers converge within a moderate number of iterations. The efficient monolithic solution of large-scale FSI problems requires the development of preconditioners for the iterative solution of the linear systems that arise during the solution of the monolithically coupled fluid and solid equations by Newton’s method. We demonstrate that recent improvements to oomph-lib’s FSI preconditioner result in mesh-independent convergence rates under uniform and non-uniform (adaptive) mesh refinement, and explore its performance in a number of two- and three-dimensional test problems involving the interaction of finite-Reynolds-number flows with shell and beam structures, as well as finite-thickness solids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Förster C, Wall W, Ramm E (2007) Artificial mass instabilities in sequential staggered coupling of nonlinear structures and incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196: 1278–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernandez MA, Gerbeau J-F, Grandmont C (2007) A projection semi-implicit scheme for the coupling of an elastic structure with an incompressible fluid. Int J Numer Methods Eng 69: 794–821

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Heil M, Hazel AL (2006) oomph-lib—An object-oriented multi-physics finite-element library. In: Schafer M, Bungartz H-J (eds) Fluid–structure interaction. Springer (Lecture Notes on Computational Science and Engineering), pp 19–49

  4. Irons BM, Tuck RC (1969) A version of the Aitken accelerator for computer iteration. Int J Num Methods Eng 1: 275–277

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Jensen OE, Heil M (2003) High-frequency self-excited oscillations in a collapsible-channel flow. J Fluid Mech 481: 235–268

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Demmel JW, Eisenstat SC, Gilbert JR, Li XS, Liu JWH (1999) A supernodal approach to sparse partial pivoting. SIAM J. Matrix analysis and applications 20:720-755. http://crd.lbl.gov/~xiaoye/SuperLU/

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heil M (2004) An efficient solver for the fully coupled solution of large-displacement fluid-structure interaction problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193: 1–23

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertram CD, Tscherry J (2006) The onset of flow-rate limitation and flow-induced oscillations in collapsible tubes. J Fluids Struct 22: 1029–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elman HC, Silvester DJ, Wathen AJ (2006) Finite elements and fast iterative solvers with applications in incompressible fluid dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York

  10. Turek S, Hron J, (2007) Proposal for numerical benchmarking of fluid–structure interaction between an elastic object and laminar incompressible flow. In: Schafer M, Bungartz H-J (eds) Fluid–structure interaction. Lecture Notes on Computational Science and Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg. pp 371–385

  11. hypre—High performance preconditioning library. Center for Applied Scientific Computing at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/hypre/software.html

  12. Trilinos. Sandia National Laboratories. http://trilinos.sandia.gov/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Heil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heil, M., Hazel, A.L. & Boyle, J. Solvers for large-displacement fluid–structure interaction problems: segregated versus monolithic approaches. Comput Mech 43, 91–101 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-008-0270-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-008-0270-6

Keywords

Navigation