Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Smaller is better

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berci G. (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using fine caliber instruments: smaller is not necessarily better. Surg Endosc 12: 1997

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kimura T, Sakuramachi S, Yoshida M, Kobayashi T, Takeuchi Y (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using fine caliber instruments. Surg Endosc 12: 283–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Traverso LW, Koo KP, Hargrave K, Unger SW, Roush TS, Swanstrom LL, Woods MS, Donohue JH, Deziel DJ, Simon IB, Froines E, Hunter J, Soper NJ (1997) Standardizing laparoscopic procedure time in determining the effect of patient age, gender and presence or absence of surgical residents during operation. Surg Endosc 11: 226–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mt. Sinai Hospital, 4300 Alton Road, Miami Beach, FL, 33140, USA

    S. W. Unger, J. Paramo & M. Perez-Izquierdo

Authors
  1. S. W. Unger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Paramo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Perez-Izquierdo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Unger, S.W., Paramo, J. & Perez-Izquierdo, M. Smaller is better. Surg Endosc 12, 1450 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900881

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900881

Keywords

Search

Navigation