Abstract
Background
During laparoscpic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of unilateral groin hernias, a significant proportion of patients are found to have unsuspected hernias (incidental defects) on the contralateral side without any clinically demonstrable signs. The reported incidence is 10% to 25%, and controversy exists about the routine repair of these hernias. We present the early results of a prospective randomized study designed to follow the clinical behavior of incidental defects.
Methods
For this study, 32 consecutive men found to have incidental defects on the contralateral side during laparoscopic TAPP repair of groin hernias were prospectively randomized into two categories. In 16 patients (control group), the defects were repaired simultaneously, and in another 16 patients (trial group), surgical repair was not performed. Subsequently, five consecutive patients found to have incidental defects were included in the trial group. Hence, the total number of patients with unrepaired defects was 21. All the patients subsequently were followed up in the clinic and examined by an independent clinician to detect any clinically demonstrable hernias.
Results
The median follow-up was 15 months for the control patients and 12 months for the trial patients. During this time, demonstrable hernias developed in 6 patients of the trial group (28,6%).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that despite a short follow-up period, a significant proportion of incidental defects will progress to a symptomatic hernia if left untreated. Hence, their simultaneous repair is justifiable on the grounds that it reduces the number of operations and hospital visits, and thus the cost to the National Health Service. It also is of major benefit to the patient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crawford DL, Hiatt JR, Phillips EH (1998) Laparoscopy identifies unexpected groin hernias. Am Surg 64: 976–978
Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study: pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 224: 598–602
Evans DS, Ghaneh P, Khan IM (1996) Day-case laparoscopic hernia repair. Br J Surg 83: 1361–1363
Gursoy MH, Gurel M, Koltuksuz Urguralp S, Aydinc M (1997) Intraoperative laparoscopy by a flexible scope: is it reliable in contralateral childhood hernias? Society Laparoendosc Surgeons 1: 225–226
Hay JM, Boudet M-J, Fingerhut A, Poucher J, Hennet H, Habib E, Veyrierei M, Flamant Y, French Association for Surgical Research (1995) Shouldice inguinal repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multicenter controlled trial in 1,578 patients. Ann Surg 222: 719–727
Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Goodwin A, Gray A, Gordon J, Storie J, Britton J, Collin J (1996) An economic evaluation of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. J Public Health Med 18: 41–48
MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. Lancet 354: 185–190
Notaras MJ (1999) Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: for most patients hernias provoke minimal symptoms [letter]. BMJ 318: 189
Panton ONM, Panton RJ (1994) Laparoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg 167: 535–537
Quilici PJ, Greaney EM, Quilici J, Anderson S (1996) Transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: results of 509 repairs. Am Surg 62: 849–852
Wulkan ML, Weiner ES, VanBalen N, Vescio P (1996) Laparoscopy through the open ipsilateral sac to evaluate presence of contralateral hernia. J Pediatr Surg 31: 1174–1176
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Online publication: 18 October 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thumbe, V.K., Evans, D.S. To repair or not to repair incidental defects found on laparoscopic repair of groin hernia. Surg Endosc 15, 47–49 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000254
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000254