Skip to main content
Log in

The femoral hernia

An ideal approach for the transabdominal preperitoneal technique (TAPP)

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: We designed a study to determine the rate of intra- and postoperative complications as well as the rate of recurrences in elective operated femoral hernias treated via the laparoscopic technique.

Methods: Between 1993 and 1998, we performed 1,097 operations in our department using the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique. Femoral hernias amounted to only 4.6% (51 cases) of these patients. The male/female ratio was 1:2. The data concerning the operations and pre- and postoperative treatment were recorded prospectively. The patients were followed up at 2 weeks and 1 year after the operation.

Results: We encountered one intraoperative bladder lesion, one subcutaneous port site infection, two postoperative hematomas that required reoperation, and two nerve irritation syndromes, which disappeared spontaneously after 6 months. Two patients developed an ileus; one required laparoscopic reintervention, and the other was treated with conventional open reoperation and intestinal resection. There were no recurrences.

Conclusions: The application of the laparoscopic approach to the treatment of femoral hernias using the TAPP technique in nonemergency situations is highly effective. To date, we have seen no recurrences. Although the rate of major complications is low, current surgical techniques need to be perfected to avoid the type of complication recognized in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bendavid R (1987) A femoral “umbrella” for femoral hernia repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet 165: 153–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bittner R, Kraft K, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, Leibl B (1998) Risiko und Nutzen der laparoskopischen Hernioplastik (TAPP). Chirurg 69: 854–858 DOI: 10.1007/s001040050500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burton C, Bauer AR Jr (1985) Femoral hernia: a review of 165 repairs. Ann Surg 148: 913–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Furtschegger A, Sandbichler P, Judmaier W, Gstir H, Steiner F, Egender G (1995) Sonography in the postoperative evaluation of lapara-scopic inguinal hernia repair. J Ultrasound Med 14: 679–684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Glassow F (1985) Femoral hernia—review of 2105 repairs in a 17 year period. Am J Surg 150: 353–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hofbauer C, Andersen PV, Juul P, Quist N (1998) Late mesh rejection as a complication to transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 12: 1164–1165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koontz AR (1952) Femoral hernia. Arch Surg 64: 298–308

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Krähenbühl L, Striffeler H, Baer HO, Büchler MW (1997) Retroperitoneal endoscopic neurectomy for nerve entrapment after hernia repair. Br J Surg 84: 216–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kraus A (1993) Nerve injury during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 342–345

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lichtenstein IL, Shore JM (1974) Simplified repair of femoral and inguinal hernia by a “plug” technique. Am J Surg 128: 439–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marenem HV, Go PM (1994) Surgical anatomy of the inferior inguinal region: consequences for laparoscopic polyprene mesh hernia repair. Surg Endosc 8: 1212–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller K, Junger W (1997) Iliocutaneous fistula formation following laparoscopic polypropylene mesh hernia repair. Surg Endosc 11: 772–773 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohta J, Yamaguchi Y, Yoshida S, Ishikawa H, Kodama J, Takeda J, Noutomi M, Suematso T, Shirouzu K (1997) Laparoscopic intervention to relieve small bowel obstruction following laparoscopic herniorraphy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6: 464–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patterson M, Walters D, Browder W (1993) Postoperative bowel obstruction following laparoscopic surgery. Am Surg 59: 656–657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosen A, Halevy A (1997) Anatomical basis for nerve injury during laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 469–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanchez-Bustos F, Ramia JM, Fernandez Ferrero F (1998) Prosthetic repair of femoral hernia: audit of long term Follow-up. Eur J Surg 164: 191–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Seelig MH, Kasperk R, Tietze L, Schumpelick V (1995) Enterokutane Fistel nach Marlex-Netz-Implantation. Chirurg 66: 739–741

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stoppa RE, Rives JL, Warlaumont CR, Palot JP, Verhaege PJ, Delattre JF (1984) The use of Dacron in the repair of hernias of the groin. Surg Clin North Am 64: 269–285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Waddington RT (1971) Femoral hernia: a recent appraisal. Br J Surg 58: 920–922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 13 June 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hernandez-Richter, T., Schardey, H.M., Rau, H.G. et al. The femoral hernia. Surg Endosc 14, 736–740 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000108

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000108

Key words

Navigation