Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of emergent laparoscopic and open repair of acutely incarcerated and strangulated hernias—short- and long-term results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Incarcerated and strangulated hernias are a common clinical presentation encompassing several challenges in acute care surgery. The role of laparoscopy is still controversial and the data is scarce. Laparoscopy enables better evaluation of the incarcerated organ and its viability. The use of mesh repair in these emergent operations is also a major concern. In this series we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic emergent repairs of acutely incarcerated and strangulated hernias, and their long-term results, in comparison to the conventional open repairs.

Methods

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of all adult patients, between the ages of 18 and 89, who underwent emergent operation due to an incarcerated and strangulated hernia between November 2017 and December 2020.

Results

During the study period, 89 patients underwent emergent operation due to incarcerated hernias-63 laparoscopic repair and 26 underwent an open repair. In the laparoscopic group (LG) 38 patients had a groin hernia and 25 had a ventral hernia, while in the open group (OG) the distribution was 12 and 14, respectively. When operated laparoscopically, all groin hernias but one were repaired in the TAPP approach and most ventral hernias were repaired using the IPOM + approach. During the peri-operative period there were 3 mortalities (1 in the LG). There were no significant differences between the groups in minor or major complications. Mean follow-up time in the LG was 27.9 months and 29.4 months in the OG. There was no significant difference in recurrence rates. Long-term results showed better outcome in the LG regarding pain at rest, difficulty doing exercise and local discomfort.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic emergent repair of incarcerated hernias is a safe and feasible approach, with better short and long-term results compared to the open approach.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Raw data were generated at Assuta Medical center. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Gallegos NC, Dawson J, Jarvis M, Hobsley M (1991) Risk of strangulation in groin hernias. Br J Surg 78:1171–1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800781007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kulah B, Kulacoglu IH, Oruc MT, Polat Duzgun A, Moran M, Ozmen MM, Coskun F (2001) Presentation and outcome of incarcerated external hernias in adults. Am J Surg 181:101–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00563-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks DC (1994) A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy. Arch Surg 129:361–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vogt DM, Curet MJ, Pitcher DE, Martin DT, Zucker KA (1995) Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic onlay versus conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 169:84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80114-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barkun JS, Wexler MJ, Hinchey EJ, Thibeault D, Meakins JL (1995) Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniorrhaphy: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 118:703–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80038-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramshaw BJ, Tucker JG, Conner T, Mason EM, Duncan TDLG (1996) A comparison of the approaches to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(86)90963-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liem MS, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LP, Vente JP, Weidema WF, van Schrijvers AJVT (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336:1541–1547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liem MSL, Van Duyn EB, Van der Graaf Y, Van Vroonhoven TJMV (2003) Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison. Ann Surg 237:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200301000-00019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mason RJ, Moazzez A, Sohn HJ, Berne TV, Katkhouda N (2011) Laparoscopic versus open anterior abdominal wall hernia repair: 30-day morbidity and mortality using the ACS-NSQIP database. Ann Surg 254:641–652. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823009e6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. HerniaSurge group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:167–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1729-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G, Hunter JG, Fitzgibbons RJ (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238:391–400. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000086662.49499.ab

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Arita NA, Nguyen MT, Nguyen DH, Berger RL, Lew DF, Suliburk JT, Askenasy EP, Kao LS, Liang MK (2015) Laparoscopic repair reduces incidence of surgical site infections for all ventral hernias. Surg Endosc 29:1769–1780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3859-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Al Chalabi H, Larkin J, Mehigan B, McCormick P (2015) A systematic review of laparoscopic versus open abdominal incisional hernia repair, with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 20:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Simone B, Birindelli A, Ansaloni L, Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Di Saverio S, Annessi V, Amico F, Catena F (2020) Emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias: WSES guidelines. Hernia 24:359–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02021-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abramson JH, Gofin J, Hopp C, Makler A, Epstein LM (1978) The epidemiology of inguinal hernia. J Epidemiol Community Health 32:59–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Watson SD, Saye WHP (1993) Combined laparoscopic incarcerated herniorrhaphy and small bowel resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:106–108

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishihara T, Kubota K, Eda N, Ishibashi S, Haraguchi Y (1996) Laparoscopic approach to incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 10:1111–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferzli G, Shapiro K, Chaudry G, Patel S (2004) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach to acutely incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 18:228–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8185-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Saggar VR, Sarangi R (2005) Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of incarcerated inguinal hernia. Hernia 9:120–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-004-0290-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi YY, Kim Z, Hur KY (2011) Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair for incarcerated inguinal hernia. J Korean Surg Soc 80:426–430. https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2011.80.6.426

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang S, Zhang G, Jin C, Cao J, Zhu Y, Shen Y, Wang M (2016) Transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic approach for incarcerated inguinal hernia repair. Med 95:6–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mancini R, Pattaro G, Spaziani E (2019) Laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) surgery for incarcerated inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 23:261–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1828-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Landau O, Kyzer S (2004) Emergent laparoscopic repair of incarcerated incisional and ventral hernia. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 18:1374–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9116-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Olmi S, Cesana G, Erba L, Croce E (2009) Emergency laparoscopic treatment of acute incarcerated incisional hernia. Hernia 13:605–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0525-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Kraft B, Bittner R (2001) Laparoscopic transperitoneal hernia repair of incarcerated hernias: Is it feasible? Results of a prospective study. Surg Endosc 15:1179–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640090073

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shah RH, Sharma A, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal M, Chowbey PK (2008) Laparoscopic repair of incarcerated ventral abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 12:457–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0374-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rebuffat C, Galli A, Scalambra MS, Balsamo F (2006) Laparoscopic repair of strangulated hernias. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 20:131–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0171-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bökeler U, Schwarz J, Bittner R, Zacheja S, Smaxwil C (2013) Teaching and training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): impact of the learning curve on patient outcome. Surg Endosc 27:2886–2893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2849-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by JR, GS-B, KL and SR. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JR and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachmuth Jacob.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Jacob Rachmuth, Guy Steinberg-Barkon, Kamila Lee, Idan Carmeli, Shlomi Rayman and Youri Mnouskin declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical approval

The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Human Research Ethics committee of the Assuta Ashdod Medical center (Ethics Approval Number 0012–19-AAA).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Patients consented to publishing their data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacob, R., Guy, SB., Kamila, L. et al. Comparison of emergent laparoscopic and open repair of acutely incarcerated and strangulated hernias—short- and long-term results. Surg Endosc 37, 2154–2162 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09743-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09743-4

Keywords

Navigation