Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Relaparoscopy” to treat early complications following colorectal surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic surgery has shown clear benefits that could also be useful in the emergency setting such as early reoperations after colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic reintervention (“relaparoscopy”) (RL) to manage postoperative complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study based on a prospectively collected database from 2000 to 2019. Patients who required a reoperation after undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were included. According to the approach used at the reoperation, the cohort was divided in laparoscopy (RL) and laparotomy (LPM). Demographics, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed.

Results

A total of 159 patients underwent a reoperation after a laparoscopic colorectal surgery: 124 (78%) had RL and 35 (22%) LPM. Demographics were similar in both groups. Patients who underwent left colectomy were more frequently reoperated by laparoscopy (RL: 42.7% vs. LPM: 22.8%, p: 0.03). The most common finding at the reoperation was anastomotic leakage, which was treated more often by RL (RL: 67.7% vs. LPM: 25.7%, p: 0.0001), and the most common strategy was drainage and loop ileostomy (RL: 65.8% vs. LPM: 17.6%, p: 0.00001). Conversion was necessary in 12 patients (9.6%). Overall morbidity rate was 52.2%. Patients in the RL group had less postoperative severe complications (RL: 12.1% vs. LPM: 22.8, p: 0.01). Mortality rate was similar in both groups.

Conclusion

Relaparoscopy is feasible and safe for treating early postoperative complications, particularly anastomotic leakage after left colectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keller DS, Ibarra S, Haas EM (2015) Minimally invasive colorectal surgery: status and technical specifications. Minerva Chir 70(5):373–380

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aly EH (2009) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91(7):541–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feo LJ, Jrebi N, Asgeirsson T et al (2014) Anastomotic leaks: technique and timing of detection. Am J Surg 207(3):371–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blumetti J, Chaudhry V, Cintron JR et al (2014) Management of anastomotic leak: lessons learned from a large colon and rectal surgery training program. World J Surg 38(4):985–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyce SA, Harris C, Stevenson A, Lumley J, Clark D (2017) Management of low colorectal anastomotic leakage in the laparoscopic era: more than a decade of experience. Dis Colon Rectum 60(8):807–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chadi SA, Fingerhut A, Berho M et al (2016) Emerging trends in the etiology, prevention, and treatment of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. J Gastrointest Surg 20(12):2035–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwak JM, Kim SH, Son DN et al (2011) The role of laparoscopic approach for anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(1):29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ricciardi R, Roberts PL, Read TE, Marcello PW, Hall JF, Schoetz DJ (2012) How often do patients return to the operating room after colorectal resections? Colorectal Dis 14(4):515–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang KH, Bourke MG, Kavanagh DO, Neary PC, O’Riordan JM (2016) A systematic review of the role of re-laparoscopy in the management of complications following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgeon 14(5):287–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cimitan A, Contardo T, Molaro R, Morpurgo E (2016) The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive colorectal resections for cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26(4):e80–e84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilshtein H, Yellinek S, Setton I, Wexner SD (2019) What are the results of laparoscopic re-operative rectal surgery? Am J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marano A, Giuffrida MC, Giraudo G, Pellegrino L, Borghi F (2017) Management of peritonitis after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: can we stick to laparoscopy? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(4):342–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yellinek S, Gilshtein H, Krizzuk D, Wexner SD (2020) Re-operation surgery following IPAA: is there a role for laparoscopy? Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07537-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rotholtz NA, Laporte M, Lencinas SM, Bun ME, Aued ML, Mezzadri NA (2009) Is a laparoscopic approach useful for treating complications after primary laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 52(2):275–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cuccurullo D, Pirozzi F, Sciuto A et al (2015) Relaparoscopy for management of postoperative complications following colorectal surgery: ten years experience in a single center. Surg Endosc 29(7):1795–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ibáñez N, Abrisqueta J, Luján J et al (2018) Reoperation after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Does the laparoscopic approach have any advantages? Cir Esp. 96(2):109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee CM, Huh JW, Yun SH et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open reintervention for anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 29(4):931–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Riordan JM, Larkin JO, Mehigan BJ, McCormick PH (2013) Re-laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of postoperative complications following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgeon 4:183–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vennix S, Abegg R, Bakker OJ et al (2013) Surgical re-interventions following colorectal surgery: open versus laparoscopic management of anastomotic leakage. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:739–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wind J, Koopman AG, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Slors JF, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2007) Laparoscopic reintervention for anastomotic leakage after primary laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94(12):1562–1566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wright DB, Koh CE, Solomon MJ (2017) Systematic review of the feasibility of laparoscopic reoperation for early postoperative complications following colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 104(4):337–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Av. Pueyrredón 1640, C1118AAT, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Nicolas A. Rotholtz & Francisco Schlottmann

  2. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Nicolas A. Rotholtz, Mariano Laporte, Mariana Matzner & Maximiliano E. Bun

Authors
  1. Nicolas A. Rotholtz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mariano Laporte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mariana Matzner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francisco Schlottmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maximiliano E. Bun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas A. Rotholtz.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Nicolás A. Rotholtz, MD, Mariano Laporte, MD, Mariana Matzner, MD, Francisco Schlottmann, MD, MPH, and Maximiliano E. Bun, MD have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rotholtz, N.A., Laporte, M., Matzner, M. et al. “Relaparoscopy” to treat early complications following colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 36, 3136–3140 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08616-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08616-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation