Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of minimally invasive surgery on hospital readmissions, emergency department visits and functional recovery after distal pancreatectomy

  • 2020 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A recent RCT showed similar postoperative outcomes and a reduced time to functional recovery in patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (DP) compared to open approach. However, it reported very-high post-discharge readmission rates, calling for further investigation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the extent to which minimally invasive surgery impacts on postoperative readmissions following DP.

Methods

Clinical data for patients undergoing DP between 2011 and 2018 were reviewed. Primary outcome was hospital readmission at 90 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included post-discharge emergency department (ED) visits and time to functional recovery. Regression analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of the laparoscopic approach and other perioperative factors.

Results

Overall, 376 consecutive patients underwent DP during the study period. Laparoscopy was successfully performed in 219 (58%) patients. Overall, 62 patients (16.5%) returned to the ED after discharge, 41 (18.7%) of laparoscopically operated patients, and 21 (13.4%) of those undergoing open surgery (p = 0.162). Forty-six (12.2%) of them required readmission, 31 (14.2%) after laparoscopic, and 15 (9.6%) after open procedures (p = 0.179). At multivariate regression, a low preoperative physical status (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2–4.7; p = 0.017), occurrence of pancreatic fistula (OR 6.8, 95% CI 2.9–15.9; p < 0.001), and post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.2–13.1; p = 0.025) were significantly associated with 90-day readmission, while laparoscopy had no impact. Median time to reach functional recovery was 5 (IQR 4–6) days. At multivariate analysis, laparoscopy reduced time to functional recovery by 13% (95% CI − 19 to − 6%; p < 0.001), time to adequate oral intake by 19% (95% CI − 27 to − 10%; p < 0.001), and time to adequate pain control by 12% (95% CI − 18 to − 5%; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Hospital readmissions and ED visits following DP were not influenced by the surgical approach. A low preoperative physical status, occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula and hemorrhage were significantly associated with post-discharge readmission within 90 days. Laparoscopy reduced time to functional recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 255:1048–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, Boerma D, van den Boezem P, Daams F, van Dam R, Dejong C, van Duyn E, Dijkgraaf M, van Eijck C, Festen S, Gerhards M, Groot Koerkamp B, de Hingh I, Kazemier G, Klaase J, de Kleine R, van Laarhoven C, Luyer M, Patijn G, Steenvoorde P, Suker M, Abu Hilal M, Busch O, Besselink M (2019) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Regenbogen SE, Cain-Nielsen AH, Norton EC, Chen LM, Birkmeyer JD, Skinner JS (2017) Costs and consequences of early hospital discharge after major inpatient surgery in older adults. JAMA Surg 152:e170123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang J, Upfill-Brown A, Dann AM, Kim SS, Girgis MD, King JC, Donahue TR (2019) Association of hospital length of stay and complications with readmission after open pancreaticoduodenectomy. JAMA Surg 154:88–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanchez-Velazquez P, Muller X, Malleo G, Park JS, Hwang HK, Napoli N, Javed AA, Inoue Y, Beghdadi N, Kalisvaart M, Vigia E, Walsh CD, Lovasik B, Busquets J, Scandavini C, Robin F, Yoshitomi H, Mackay TM, Busch OR, Hartog H, Heinrich S, Gleisner A, Perinel J, Passeri M, Lluis N, Raptis DA, Tschuor C, Oberkofler CE, DeOliveira ML, Petrowsky H, Martinie J, Asbun H, Adham M, Schulick R, Lang H, Koerkamp BG, Besselink MG, Han HS, Miyazaki M, Ferrone CR, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Lillemoe KD, Sulpice L, Boudjema K, Del Chiaro M, Fabregat J, Kooby DA, Allen P, Lavu H, Yeo CJ, Barroso E, Roberts K, Muiesan P, Sauvanet A, Saiura A, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Boggi U, Yoon DS, Bassi C, Puhan MA, Clavien PA (2019) Benchmarks in pancreatic surgery: a novel tool for unbiased outcome comparisons. Ann Surg 270:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher AV, Fernandes-Taylor S, Campbell-Flohr SA, Clarkson SJ, Winslow ER, Abbott DE, Weber SM (2017) 30-day readmission after pancreatic resection: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 266:242–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marchegiani G, Andrianello S, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Malleo G, Marchese T, Panzeri F, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Lillemoe KD, Bassi C, Salvia R, Ferrone CR (2018) Hospital readmission after distal pancreatectomy is predicted by specific intra- and post-operative factors. Am J Surg 216:511–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, Rocchetti S, Capitanio V, Di Carlo V (2008) Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg 95:357–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pecorelli N, Capretti G, Balzano G, Castoldi R, Maspero M, Beretta L, Braga M (2017) Enhanced recovery pathway in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy: a case-matched study. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 19:270–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Braga M, Ridolfi C, Balzano G, Castoldi R, Pecorelli N, Di Carlo V (2012) Learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a high-volume hospital. Updates Surg 64:179–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic S (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zogg CK, Pawlik TM, Haider AH (2018) Three common methodological issues in studies of surgical readmission rates: the trouble with readmissions. JAMA Surg 153:1074–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, Rawashdeh M, Aleotti F, Al-Sarireh B, Alseidi A, Ateeb Z, Balzano G, Berrevoet F, Bjornsson B, Boggi U, Busch OR, Butturini G, Casadei R, Del Chiaro M, Chikhladze S, Cipriani F, van Dam R, Damoli I, van Dieren S, Dokmak S, Edwin B, van Eijck C, Fabre JM, Falconi M, Farges O, Fernandez-Cruz L, Forgione A, Frigerio I, Fuks D, Gavazzi F, Gayet B, Giardino A, Groot Koerkamp B, Hackert T, Hassenpflug M, Kabir I, Keck T, Khatkov I, Kusar M, Lombardo C, Marchegiani G, Marshall R, Menon KV, Montorsi M, Orville M, de Pastena M, Pietrabissa A, Poves I, Primrose J, Pugliese R, Ricci C, Roberts K, Rosok B, Sahakyan MA, Sanchez-Cabus S, Sandstrom P, Scovel L, Solaini L, Soonawalla Z, Souche FR, Sutcliffe RP, Tiberio GA, Tomazic A, Troisi R, Wellner U, White S, Wittel UA, Zerbi A, Bassi C, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M (2019) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a Pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg 269:10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baker MS, Bentrem DJ, Ujiki MB, Stocker S, Talamonti MS (2011) Adding days spent in readmission to the initial postoperative length of stay limits the perceived benefit of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy when compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 201:295–299 (discussion 299–300)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Loos M, Strobel O, Legominski M, Dietrich M, Hinz U, Brenner T, Heininger A, Weigand MA, Buchler MW, Hackert T (2018) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: microbial growth determines outcome. Surgery 164:1185–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Seykora TF, Liu JB, Maggino L, Pitt HA, Vollmer CM Jr (2019) Drain management following distal pancreatectomy: characterization of contemporary practice and impact of early removal. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maggino L, Malleo G, Bassi C, Allegrini V, Beane JD, Beckman RM, Chen B, Dickson EJ, Drebin JA, Ecker BL, Fraker DL, House MG, Jamieson NB, Javed AA, Kowalsky SJ, Lee MK, McMillan MT, Roses RE, Salvia R, Valero V 3rd, Velu LKP, Wolfgang CL, Zureikat AH, Vollmer CM Jr (2019) Identification of an optimal cut-off for drain fluid amylase on postoperative day 1 for predicting clinically relevant fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis and external validation. Ann Surg 269:337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Buren G 2nd, Bloomston M, Schmidt CR, Behrman SW, Zyromski NJ, Ball CG, Morgan KA, Hughes SJ, Karanicolas PJ, Allendorf JD, Vollmer CM Jr, Ly Q, Brown KM, Velanovich V, Winter JM, McElhany AL, Muscarella P 2nd, Schmidt CM, House MG, Dixon E, Dillhoff ME, Trevino JG, Hallet J, Coburn NSG, Nakeeb A, Behrns KE, Sasson AR, Ceppa EP, Abdel-Misih SRZ, Riall TS, Silberfein EJ, Ellison EC, Adams DB, Hsu C, Tran Cao HS, Mohammed S, Villafane-Ferriol N, Barakat O, Massarweh NN, Chai C, Mendez-Reyes JE, Fang A, Jo E, Mo Q, Fisher WE (2017) A prospective randomized multicenter trial of distal pancreatectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg 266:421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ecker BL, McMillan MT, Allegrini V, Bassi C, Beane JD, Beckman RM, Behrman SW, Dickson EJ, Callery MP, Christein JD, Drebin JA, Hollis RH, House MG, Jamieson NB, Javed AA, Kent TS, Kluger MD, Kowalsky SJ, Maggino L, Malleo G, Valero V 3rd, Velu LKP, Watkins AA, Wolfgang CL, Zureikat AH, Vollmer CM Jr (2019) Risk factors and mitigation strategies for pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: analysis of 2026 resections from the international, multi-institutional distal pancreatectomy study group. Ann Surg 269:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramanathan R, Mason T, Wolfe LG, Kaplan BJ (2018) Predictors of short-term readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 22:998–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wahl TS, Graham LA, Hawn MT, Richman J, Hollis RH, Jones CE, Copeland LA, Burns EA, Itani KM, Morris MS (2017) Association of the modified frailty index with 30-day surgical readmission. JAMA Surg 152:749–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hall DE, Arya S, Schmid KK, Blaser C, Carlson MA, Bailey TL, Purviance G, Bockman T, Lynch TG, Johanning J (2017) Development and initial validation of the risk analysis index for measuring frailty in surgical populations. JAMA Surg 152:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pecorelli N, Nobile S, Partelli S, Cardinali L, Crippa S, Balzano G, Beretta L, Falconi M (2016) Enhanced recovery pathways in pancreatic surgery: state of the art. World J Gastroenterol WJG 22:6456–6468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Alam R, Montanez J, Law S, Lee L, Pecorelli N, Watanabe Y, Chiavegato LD, Falconi M, Hirano S, Mayo NE, Feldman LS, Fiore JF Jr (2020) Development of a conceptual framework of recovery after abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 34:2665–2674

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy

    Nicolò Pecorelli, Giovanni Guarneri, Stefano Partelli, Stefano Crippa, Renato Castoldi, Gianpaolo Balzano & Massimo Falconi

  2. Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy

    Kemal Alagol, Michele Mazza, Roberto Quattromani, Stefano Partelli, Stefano Crippa & Massimo Falconi

Authors
  1. Nicolò Pecorelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giovanni Guarneri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kemal Alagol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michele Mazza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Roberto Quattromani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stefano Partelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stefano Crippa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Renato Castoldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gianpaolo Balzano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Massimo Falconi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Falconi.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Nicolò Pecorelli, Giovanni Guarneri, Kemal Alagol, Michele Mazza, Roberto Quattromani, Stefano Partelli, Stefano Crippa, Renato Castoldi, Gianpaolo Balzano, and Massimo Falconi have no conflicts of interests or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pecorelli, N., Guarneri, G., Alagol, K. et al. The impact of minimally invasive surgery on hospital readmissions, emergency department visits and functional recovery after distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 35, 5740–5751 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08051-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08051-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation