Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perfusion speed of indocyanine green in the stomach before tubulization is an objective and useful parameter to evaluate gastric microcirculation during Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy

  • New Technology
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leakage (AL) during Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (ILE), owing to gastric conduit (GC) ischemia, is a serious complication. Measurement parameters during intraoperative ICG fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) are unclear. We aimed to identify objective ICG-FA parameters associated with AL.

Study design

Patients > 18 years with an indication for ILE were enrolled. ICG-FA was performed at the abdominal and thoracic stage, and data, such as time of fluorescence appearance, speed of ICG perfusion, quality of GC perfusion (good, poor, ischemic), blood pressure, baseline patient characteristics, GC dimensions, and other intraoperative parameters were collected. On postoperative day 4 to 6, Gastrografin swallow radiography was performed. AL development was classified based on the Clavien–Dindo and SISG severity classifications. Univariate analysis with a 95% confidence level (p < 0.05) was performed. Factors with p < 0.05 were included in the multivariate analysis.

Results

100 patients were enrolled. During ICG-FA, evaluation of subjective perfusion was a very specific test (94.1%) with good negative predictive value (NPV 71.9%, p 0.034), but not powerful enough to detect patients at risk of leak (sensibility 21.8%, PPV 63.6%). The GC perfusion speed (cm/s) after gastric vascular isolation and before tubulization showed a significant association with AL (p < 0.003). Median arterial blood pressure in the thoracic stage (p < 0.001) or use of inotropic (p < 0.033) was associated with AL development.

Conclusion

GC perfusion speed at ICG-FA is an objective parameter that could predict AL risk. Other results emphasize the importance of the microcirculation in the development of AL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang L, Onaitis M (2014) Minimally invasive and robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 6:S314–S321

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alanezi K, Urschel JD (2004) Mortality secondary to esophageal anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 10:71–75

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell JD (2006) Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 16:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan CE, Paniccia A, Meguid RA, McCarter MD (2017) Transthoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: current trends. Ann Surg Oncol 24:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ et al (2009) Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:569–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Karliczek A, Benaron DA, Baas PC et al (2008) Intraoperative assessment of microperfusion with visible light spectroscopy in esophageal and colorectal anastomoses. Eur Surg Res 41:303–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ikeda Y, Niimi M, Kan S et al (2001) Clinical significance of tissue blood flow during esophagectomy by laser Doppler flowmetry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122:1101–1106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miyazaki T, Kuwano H, Kato H et al (2002) Predictive value of blood flow in the gastric tube in anastomotic insufficiency after thoracic esophagectomy. World J Surg 26:1319–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Servais EL, Rizk NP, Oliveira L et al (2011) Real-time intraoperative detection of tissue hypoxia in gastrointestinal surgery by wireless pulse oximetry. Surg Endosc 25:1383–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Desmettre T, Devoisselle JM, Mordon S (2000) Fluorescence properties and metabolic features of indocyanine green (ICG) as related to angiography. Surv Ophthalmol 45:15–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ladak F, Dang JT, Switzer N et al (2019) Indocyanine green for the prevention of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 33:384–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lerut T, Coosemans W, Decker G et al (2002) Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Dig Surg 19:92–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Slooter MD, Eshuis WJ, Cuesta MA et al (2019) Fluorescent imaging using indocyanine green during esophagectomy to prevent surgical morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 11:S755–S765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumagai Y, Ishiguro T, Sobajima J et al (2016) Factors affecting blood flow at the tip of the reconstructed gastric tube during esophagectomy: a study using indocyanine green fluorescence angiography. Int Surg 101:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumagai Y, Hatano S, Sobajima J et al (2018) Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography of the reconstructed gastric tube during esophagectomy: efficacy of the 90-second rule. Dis Esophagus. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prasetya H, Jansen SM, Marquering HA et al (2019) Estimation of microvascular perfusion after esophagectomy: a quantitative model of dynamic fluorescence imaging. Med Biol Eng Comput 57:1889–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishige F, Nabeya Y, Hoshino I et al (2019) Quantitative assessment of the blood perfusion of the gastric conduit by indocyanine green imaging. J Surg Res 234:303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ohi M, Toiyama Y, Mohri Y et al (2017) Prevalence of anastomotic leak and the impact of indocyanine green fluorescein imaging for evaluating blood flow in the gastric conduit following esophageal cancer surgery. Esophagus 14:351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Oguma J et al (2016) Blood flow speed of the gastric conduit assessed by indocyanine green fluorescence. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e4386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wesselink EM, Kappen TH, Tom HM et al (2018) Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth 121:706–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Low DE, Allum W, De Manzoni G et al (2019) Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J Surg 43:299–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Klevebro F, Boshier PR, Low DE (2019) Application of standardized hemodynamic protocols within enhanced recovery after surgery programs to improve outcomes associated with anastomotic leak and conduit necrosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 11:S692–S701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bahlmann H, Halldestam I, Nilsson L (2019) Goal-directed therapy during transthoracic oesophageal resection does not improve outcome: randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anesthesiol 36:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin M, Shen Y, Feng M, Tan L (2019) Is two lung ventilation with artificial pneumothorax a better choice than one lung ventilation in minimally invasive esophagectomy? J Thorac Dis 11:S707–S712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD et al (2006) Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 82:402–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van Workum F, Berkelmans GH, Klarenbeek BR, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Luyer MD, Rosman C (2017) McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 9:S826–S833

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

There has not been any direct or indirect financial support by extramural sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.R., P.P. and U.E. have done the study conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript. E.T.-U. has helped in the acquisition of data, and has done the analysis and interpretation of data and drafting of the manuscript. S.T. has helped in the analysis and interpretation of data, and in the drafting of the manuscript. A.C. contributed to the study conception and design, and has helped in the acquisition of data. M.P., G.O. and L.B. have helped in the acquisition of data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eider Talavera-Urquijo.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Eider Talavera-Urquijo, Paolo Parise, Marco Palucci, Greta Olivari, Stefano Turi, Andrea Cossu, Lavinia Barbieri, Ugo Elmore and Riccardo Rosati have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Talavera-Urquijo, E., Parise, P., Palucci, M. et al. Perfusion speed of indocyanine green in the stomach before tubulization is an objective and useful parameter to evaluate gastric microcirculation during Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 34, 5649–5659 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07924-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07924-7

Keywords

Navigation