Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Independent risk factors for esophageal refractory stricture after extensive endoscopic submucosal dissection

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is accepted as a standard therapeutic technique for superficial esophageal neoplasms (SENs). However, esophageal refractory stricture is a serious adverse event secondary to extensive ESD (≥ 3/4 of the luminal circumference). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the risk factors for refractory postoperative stricture after extensive ESD.

Methods

The data of patients who underwent esophageal ESD at the Endoscopy Center of Changhai Hospital were reviewed between January 2011 and September 2019. Risk factors for postoperative refractory stricture [≥ 6 sessions of endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD)] after extensive ESD were then identified using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 69 SENs in 67 patients treated by extensive ESD were enrolled in this study. The refractory stricture incidence was 62% (43/69). Significant differences between non-refractory stricture group and refractory stricture group were observed in depth of infiltration (m1or m2/m3 or sm1:20/6 vs. 17/26, P = 0.003), longitudinal resection length (< 50 mm/ ≥ 50 mm:19/7 vs. 10/33, P < 0.001), circumferential range (3/4~ < 1/1:20/6 vs. 19/24, P = 0.008), muscular injury (NO/YES:18/8 vs. 19/24, P = 0.043), and clip number (≤ 5/ > 5:15/11 vs. 12/31, P = 0.014). Multivariate analysis revealed that longitudinal resection length ≥ 50 mm (odds ratio [OR] 11.099, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.620–47.019), depth of infiltration above m2 (OR 5.716, 95%CI 1.324–24.672) and muscular injury happened (OR 4.431, 95%CI 1.052–18.659) were independent risk factors for refractory stricture. In addition, the EBD sessions for treatment of refractory stricture was related to longitudinal resection length (relation coefficient γ = 0.528; P  <0.05).

Conclusions

The longitudinal resection length, depth of tumor infiltration and muscular injury are the reliable risk factors for esophageal refractory stricture after extensive ESD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shimizu Y, Takahashi M, Yoshida T, Ono S, Mabe K, Kato M, Asaka M (2012) Endoscopic resection is the criterion standard of treatment for patients with early squamous cell neoplasia of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 76:464–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsujii Y, Nishida T, Nishiyama O, Yamamoto K, Kawai N, Yamaguchi S, Yamada T, Yoshio T, Kitamura S, Nakamura T, Nishihara A, Ogiyama H, Nakahara M, Komori M, Kato M, Hayashi Y, Shinzaki S, Iijima H, Michida T, Tsujii M, Takehara T (2015) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endoscopy 47:775–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Odagiri H, Yasunaga H, Matsui H, Matsui S, Fushimi K, Kaise M (2017) Hospital volume and adverse events following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan. Endoscopy 49:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, Goto O, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Omata M (2009) Predictors of postoperative stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous cell neoplasms. Endoscopy 41:661–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shi Q, Ju H, Yao LQ, Zhou PH, Xu MD, Chen T, Zhou JM, Chen TY, Zhong YS (2014) Risk factors for postoperative stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal carcinoma. Endoscopy 46:640–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wen J, Lu Z, Yang Y, Liu Q, Yang J, Wang S, Wang X, Du H, Meng J, Wang H, Linghu E (2014) Preventing stricture formation by covered esophageal stent placement after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer. Dig Dis Sci 59:658–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamamoto Y, Kikuchi D, Nagami Y, Nonaka K, Tsuji Y, Fujimoto A, Sanomura Y, Tanaka K, Abe S, Zhang S, De Lusong MA, Uedo N (2019) Management of adverse events related to endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms: Review of the literature and recommendations from experts. Dig Endosc 31(Suppl 1):4–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li J, Tang J, Lua GW, Chen J, Shi X, Liu F, Li Z (2017) Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection of large (>/=3 cm) subepithelial tumors located in the cardia. Surg Endosc 31:5183–5191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kochman ML, McClave SA, Boyce HW (2005) The refractory and the recurrent esophageal stricture: a definition. Gastrointest Endosc 62:474–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Miwata T, Oka S, Tanaka S, Kagemoto K, Sanomura Y, Urabe Y, Hiyama T, Chayama K (2016) Risk factors for esophageal stenosis after entire circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surg Endosc 30:4049–4056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yano T, Yoda Y, Nomura S, Toyosaki K, Hasegawa H, Ono H, Tanaka M, Morimoto H, Horimatsu T, Nonaka S, Kaneko K, Sato A (2017) Prospective trial of biodegradable stents for refractory benign esophageal strictures after curative treatment of esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 86:492–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kadota T, Yoda Y, Hori K, Shinmura K, Oono Y, Ikematsu H, Yano T (2020) Prophylactic steroid administration against strictures is not enough for mucosal defects involving the entire circumference of the esophageal lumen after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Esophagus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00730-z

  13. Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M, Oda I, Nimura S, Yahagi N, Iishi H, Oka M, Ajioka Y, Ichinose M, Matsui T (2016) Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc 28:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, Repici A, Vieth M, De Ceglie A, Amato A, Berr F, Bhandari P, Bialek A, Conio M, Haringsma J, Langner C, Meisner S, Messmann H, Morino M, Neuhaus H, Piessevaux H, Rugge M, Saunders BP, Robaszkiewicz M, Seewald S, Kashin S, Dumonceau JM, Hassan C, Deprez PH (2015) Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 47:829–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu M, Tan Y, Liu D (2019) Strategies to prevent stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Ann Transl Med 7:271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lew RJ, Kochman ML (2002) A review of endoscopic methods of esophageal dilation. J Clin Gastroenterol 35:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nonaka K, Miyazawa M, Ban S, Aikawa M, Akimoto N, Koyama I, Kita H (2013) Different healing process of esophageal large mucosal defects by endoscopic mucosal dissection between with and without steroid injection in an animal model. BMC Gastroenterol 13:72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Honda M, Nakamura T, Hori Y, Shionoya Y, Nakada A, Sato T, Yamamoto K, Kobayashi T, Shimada H, Kida N, Hashimoto A, Hashimoto Y (2010) Process of healing of mucosal defects in the esophagus after endoscopic mucosal resection: histological evaluation in a dog model. Endoscopy 42:1092–1095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuribayashi Y, Iizuka T, Nomura K, Furuhata T, Yamashita S, Matsui A, Kikuchi D, Mitani T, Kaise M, Hoteya S (2018) Esophageal motility after extensive circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer. Digestion 98:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abe S, Iyer PG, Oda I, Kanai N, Saito Y (2017) Approaches for stricture prevention after esophageal endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc 86:779–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamaguchi N, Isomoto H, Nakayama T, Hayashi T, Nishiyama H, Ohnita K, Takeshima F, Shikuwa S, Kohno S, Nakao K (2011) Usefulness of oral prednisolone in the treatment of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 73:1115–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hanaoka N, Ishihara R, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Higashino K, Ohta T, Kanzaki H, Hanafusa M, Nagai K, Matsui F, Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Ito Y (2012) Intralesional steroid injection to prevent stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal cancer: a controlled prospective study. Endoscopy 44:1007–1011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ezoe Y, Muto M, Horimatsu T, Morita S, Miyamoto S, Mochizuki S, Minashi K, Yano T, Ohtsu A, Chiba T (2011) Efficacy of preventive endoscopic balloon dilation for esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection. J Clin Gastroenterol 45:222–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Muto M, Ezoe Y, Yano T, Aoyama I, Yoda Y, Minashi K, Morita S, Horimatsu T, Miyamoto S, Ohtsu A, Chiba T (2012) Usefulness of endoscopic radial incision and cutting method for refractory esophagogastric anastomotic stricture (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 75:965–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yano T, Yoda Y, Satake H, Kojima T, Yagishita A, Oono Y, Ikematsu H, Kaneko K (2013) Radial incision and cutting method for refractory stricture after nonsurgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Endoscopy 45:316–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Takahashi H, Arimura Y, Okahara S, Uchida S, Ishigaki S, Tsukagoshi H, Shinomura Y, Hosokawa M (2011) Risk of perforation during dilation for esophageal strictures after endoscopic resection in patients with early squamous cell carcinoma. Endoscopy 43:184–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81670604; 81772640; 81670585).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design (ZL); analysis and interpretation of the data (JT, FK); drafting of the article (JT, JL); critical revision of the article for important intellectual content (JL, FL); study supervision (XK). The article has been approved by all authors to be published.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Feng Liu, Xiangyu Kong or Zhaoshen Li.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Jian Tang, Fanyang Kong, Jun Li, Feng Liu, Xiangyu Kong and Zhaoshen Li have no conflicts of interests or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, J., Kong, F., Li, J. et al. Independent risk factors for esophageal refractory stricture after extensive endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 35, 3618–3627 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07840-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07840-w

Keywords

Navigation