Skip to main content
Log in

Short-term outcome of routine use of EndoFLIP during hiatal hernia repair

  • 2020 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) technology is a tool that can be used to provide intraoperative objective real-time feedback during hiatal hernia repair. We wanted to determine the implication of initial distensibility index (DI) after mobilization of hiatus and final DI after creation of barrier in short-term clinical outcomes.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on the intraoperative use of EndoFLIP during hiatal hernia repair at a single institution from 2017 to 2019. We analyzed the initial DI and final DI with the short-term clinical outcomes.

Results

There were 163 patients who had Nissen (n = 16), Toupet (n = 79) or magnetic sphincter augmentation (n = 68) with (n = 158) or without (n = 5) hiatal hernia repair with median initial DI was 3.2 mm2/mmHg. We used 3 mm2/mmHg as the cutoff for low (n = 84) vs. high (n = 79) initial DI group. There was no difference in DeMeester score (p = 0.76), the peristalsis on manometry (p = 0.13), type of hiatal hernia (p = 0.98), and GERD-HRQL score prior to surgery (p = 0.73) between the groups. There was significantly higher final DI in the high initial DI group compared to low initial DI group; however, there was no significant difference in the GERD-HRQL score at 1–3 months (p = 0.28). All of the patients had a final DI > 0.5 mm2/mmHg at the end of the case with median final DI of 1.6 mm2/mmHg. None of these patients required steroids (0%) and only one patient (0.6%) required EGD and dilatation as well as re-operation for dysphagia within 3 months.

Conclusions

The initial DI was associated with final DI, but it did not correlate with improvement in short-term GERD-HRQL score. Final DI maintained above the cutoff value led to most of the patients not to require intervention for dysphagia. Use of the EndoFLIP can provide objective data during the operation and prevent severe dysphagia after repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jarral OA, Athanasiou T, Hanna GB, Zacharakis E (2012) Is an intra-oesophageal bougie of use during Nissen fundoplication? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 14(6):828–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huttl TP, Hohle M, Wichmann MW, Jauch KW, Meyer G (2005) Techniques and results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in Germany. Surg Endosc 19(12):1579–1587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim MP, Meisenbach LM, Chan EY (2018) Tailored fundoplication with endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe allows for successful minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28(3):178–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tucker E, Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Telakis E, Knowles K, Wright J, Fox M (2013) Measurement of esophago-gastric junction cross-sectional area and distensibility by an endolumenal functional lumen imaging probe for the diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 25(11):904–910

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perretta S, Dallemagne B, McMahon B, Agostino J, Marescaux J (2011) Video Improving functional esophageal surgery with a smart bougie. Endoflip. Surg Endosc. 25(9):3109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Su B, Novak S, Callahan ZM, Kuchta K, Carbray J, Ujiki MB (2019) Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) in the operating room to assess gastroesophageal junction distensibility and predict patient outcomes following fundoplication. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06925-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DeHaan RK, Davila D, Frelich MJ, Gould JC (2017) Esophagogastric junction distensibility is greater following Toupet compared to Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 31(1):193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Turner B, Helm M, Hetzel E, Gould JC (2019) Is that 'floppy' fundoplication tight enough? Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06947-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ilczyszyn A, Botha AJ (2014) Feasibility of esophagogastric junction distensibility measurement during Nissen fundoplication. Dis Esophagus 27(7):637–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lottrup C, McMahon BP, Ejstrud P, Ostapiuk MA, Funch-Jensen P, Drewes AM (2016) Esophagogastric junction distensibility in hiatus hernia. Dis Esophagus 29(5):463–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carlson DA, Kou W, Lin Z, Hinchcliff M, Thakrar A, Falmagne S, Prescott J, Dorian E, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE (2019) Normal values of esophageal distensibility and distension-induced contractility measured by functional luminal imaging probe panometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 17(4):674–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nathanson LK, Brunott N, Cavallucci D (2012) Adult esophagogastric junction distensibility during general anesthesia assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP(R)). Surg Endosc 26(4):1051–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carlson DA, Lin Z, Rogers MC, Lin CY, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE (2015) Utilizing functional lumen imaging probe topography to evaluate esophageal contractility during volumetric distention: a pilot study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 27(7):981–989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ata-Lawenko RM, Lee YY (2017) Emerging roles of the endolumenal functional lumen imaging probe in gastrointestinal motility disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 23(2):164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen JW, Rubenstein JH (2017) Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed using the functional lumen imaging probe. World J Gastroenterol 23(7):1289–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rona KA, Tatum JM, Zehetner J, Schwameis K, Chow C, Samakar K, Dobrowolsky A, Houghton CC, Bildzukewicz N, Lipham JC (2018) Hiatal hernia recurrence following magnetic sphincter augmentation and posterior cruroplasty: intermediate-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 32(7):3374–3379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ayazi S, Zheng P, Zaidi AH, Chovanec K, Chowdhury N, Salvitti M, Komatsu Y, Omstead AN, Hoppo T, Jobe BA (2020) Magnetic sphincter augmentation and postoperative dysphagia: characterization, clinical risk factors, and management. J Gastrointest Surg 24(1):39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min P. Kim.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Min P Kim is consultant for Veran, Intuitive Surgical and Medtronic. Edward Chan is consultant for Veran. Ugoeze Nwokedi, Duc T. Nguyen, Leonora M. Meisenbach, Ray Chihara and Edward A. Graviss does not have any conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nwokedi, U., Nguyen, D.T., Meisenbach, L.M. et al. Short-term outcome of routine use of EndoFLIP during hiatal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 35, 3840–3849 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07788-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07788-x

Keywords

Navigation