Skip to main content
Log in

Surgeon leadership style and risk-adjusted patient outcomes

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There are many reasons to believe that surgeon personality traits and related leadership behaviors influence patient outcomes. For example, participation in continuing education, effective self-reflection, and openness to feedback are associated with certain personalities and may also lead to improvement in outcomes. In this context, we sought to determine if an individual surgeon’s thinking and behavior traits correlate with patient level outcomes after bariatric surgery.

Methods

Practicing surgeons from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative (MBSC) were administered the Life Styles Inventory (LSI) assessment. The results of this assessment were then collapsed into three major styles that corresponded with particular patterns of an individual’s thinking and behavior: constructive (achievement, self-actualizing, humanistic-encouraging, affiliative), passive/defensive (approval, conventional, dependent, avoidance), and aggressive/defensive (perfectionistic, competitive, power, oppositional). We compared patients level outcomes for surgeons in the lowest, middle, and highest quintiles for each style. We then used patient level risk-adjusted rates of complications after bariatric surgery to quantify the impact surgeon style on post-operative outcomes.

Results

We found that patients undergoing bariatric surgery performed by surgeons with high levels of constructive (achievement, self-actualizing, humanistic-encouraging, affiliative) and passive/defensive (approval, conventional, dependent, avoidance) styles had lower rates of adverse events compared with surgeons with low levels of the respective styles [High constructive: 14.7% (13.8–15.6%), low constructive: 17.7% (16.8–18.6%); high passive: 14.8% (13.4–16.1%), low passive: 18.7% (17.3–19.9%)]. Conversely, surgeons identified with high aggressive styles (perfectionistic, competitive, power, oppositional) had similar rates of post-operative adverse events compared with surgeons with low levels [high aggressive: 15.2% (14.3–16.1%), low aggressive: 14.9% (14.2–15.6%)].

Conclusion

Our analysis demonstrates that surgeons’ leadership styles are correlated with surgical outcomes for individual patients. This finding underscores the need for professional development for surgeons to cultivate strengths in the constructive domains including intentional self-improvement, development of interpersonal skills, and the receptiveness to feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Emanuel E, Gudbranson E (2018) Does medicine overemphasize IQ? JAMA 319:651–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Drosdeck J, Osayi S, Peterson L, Yu L, Ellison E, Muscarella P (2015) Surgeon and nonsurgeon personalities at different career points. J Surg Res 196(1):60–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leach L, Myrtle R, Weaver F (2011) Surgical teams: role perspectives and role dynamics in the operating room. Health Serv Manag Res 24(2):81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkmeyer J, Finks J, O’Reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin A, Nunn A, Dimick J, Banerjee M, Birkmeyer N (2013) Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 369(15):1434–1442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Telem D, Jones D, Schauer P, Brethauer S, Rosenthal R, Provost D, Jones S (2018) Updated panel report: best practices for the surgical treatment of obesity. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6160-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative (2018) http://michiganbsc.org/. Accessed 2 Apr 2018

  7. Life Styles Inventory (2018) https://www.humansynergistics.com/change-solutions/change-solutions-for-individuals/assessments-for-individuals/life-styles-inventory. Accessed 2 Apr 2018

  8. Ware M, Leak G, Perry N (1985) Life styles inventory: evidence for its factorial validity. Psychol Rep 56(3):963–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu Y, Parker S, Lipsitz S, Arriaga A, Peyre S, Corso K, Roth E, Yule S, Greenberg C (2016) Surgeons’ leadership styles and team behavior in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 222(1):41–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Makary M, Sexton J, Freischlag J, Holzmueller C, Milliman E, Rowen L, Pronovost P (2006) Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 202(5):746–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frasier L, Quamme S, Becker A, Booth S, Gutt A, Wiegmann D, Greenberg C (2017) Investigating teamwork in the operating room: engaging stakeholders and setting the agenda. JAMA Surg 152(1):109–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.S. is supported by the National Clinician Scholars Program at the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Research at the University of Michigan. A.K. is supported by the NIH Grant T32 HS000053-24. J.D. is supported for this work through R01 Grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Grant #: R01DK101423 and R01HS023597).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah P. Shubeck.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Dimick is a Cofounder of ArborMetrix, a company that makes software for profiling hospital quality and efficiency. Sarah Shubeck and Arielle Kanters have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shubeck, S.P., Kanters, A.E. & Dimick, J.B. Surgeon leadership style and risk-adjusted patient outcomes. Surg Endosc 33, 471–474 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6320-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6320-z

Keywords

Navigation