Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structured assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation skills: the SALAS score

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Tools are needed to assess laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN) in the operating room. Here, we aimed to develop an objective rating scale for LCN.

Study design

We defined the following key aspects of LCN: operational field centering, correct angle of the horizon, correct instrument visualization, verbal commands from the operating surgeon, and manual corrections from the operating surgeon. We then developed a score based on intraoperative error evaluation from intraoperative recordings of 80 procedures. Finally, the newly developed score was validated by four different raters using video-based analysis of 20 elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Results

We developed and validated a tool for the structured assessment of laparoscopic assistant skills (SALAS). This score showed good internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of > 0.7. Intraclass correlation revealed a low interrater variability (ICC 0.866) for the total score. Comparison of experienced and inexperienced camera assistants revealed significantly better SALAS scores for experienced assistants (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our present results show that SALAS score is valid, reliable, and practicable. This score can be used for future investigations of camera navigation efficiency and training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bittner R (2006) Laparoscopic surgery—15 years after clinical introduction. World J Surg 30(7):1190–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0644-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Korndorffer JR Jr, Hayes DJ, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Touchard CL, Markert RJ, Scott DJ (2005) Development and transferability of a cost-effective laparoscopic camera navigation simulator. Surg Endosc 19(2):161–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8901-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Omote K, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A, Arbter K, Wei GQ, Siewert JR, Hirzinger G (1999) Self-guided robotic camera control for laparoscopic surgery compared with human camera control. Am J Surg 177(4):321–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00055-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Franzeck FM, Rosenthal R, Muller MK, Nocito A, Wittich F, Maurus C, Dindo D, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D (2012) Prospective randomized controlled trial of simulator-based versus traditional in-surgery laparoscopic camera navigation training. Surg Endosc 26(1):235–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1860-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huber T, Paschold M, Lang H, Kneist W (2015) Influence of a camera navigation training on team performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. J Surg Sim 2:35–39. https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2015.0008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84(2):273–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondre K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2005) A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 190(1):107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eubanks TR, Clements RH, Pohl D, Williams N, Schaad DC, Horgan S, Pellegrini C (1999) An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 189(6):566–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nilsson C, Sorensen JL, Konge L, Westen M, Stadeager M, Ottesen B, Bjerrum F (2017) Simulation-based camera navigation training in laparoscopy-a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 31(5):2131–2139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5210-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rooney DM, Brissman IC, Gauger PG (2015) Ongoing evaluation of video-based assessment of proctors’ scoring of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery manual skills examination. J Surg Educ 72(3):471–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.10.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nickel F, Hendrie JD, Stock C, Salama M, Preukschas AA, Senft JD, Kowalewski KF, Wagner M, Kenngott HG, Linke GR, Fischer L, Muller-Stich BP (2016) Direct observation versus endoscopic video recording-based rating with the objective structured assessment of technical skills for training of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur Surg Res 57(1–2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roch PJ, Rangnick HM, Brzoska JA, Benner L, Kowalewski KF, Muller PC, Kenngott HG, Muller-Stich BP, Nickel F (2018) Impact of visual-spatial ability on laparoscopic camera navigation training. Surg Endosc 32(3):1174–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5789-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Graafland M, Bok K, Schreuder HW, Schijven MP (2014) A multicenter prospective cohort study on camera navigation training for key user groups in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Innov 21(3):312–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350613505714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paschold M, Huber T, Maedge S, Zeissig SR, Lang H, Kneist W (2017) Laparoscopic assistance by operating room nurses: results of a virtual-reality study. Nurse Educ Today 51:68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.01.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fujii K, Salerno A, Sriskandarajah K, Kwok KW, Shetty K, Yang GZ (2013) Gaze contingent cartesian control of a robotic arm for laparoscopic surgery. Rep US 2013:3582–3589

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gillen S, Pletzer B, Heiligensetzer A, Wolf P, Kleeff J, Feussner H, Furst A (2014) Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 28(1):164–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3142-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cahais J, Schwarz L, Bridoux V, Huet E, Tuech JJ (2017) Is the image “right” for everyone? Introduction to the parallax effect in laparoscopic surgery. J Visc Surg 154(1):11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.06.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank J. Kowalski for his support with software editing, and the members of the surgical department for their participation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany

    T. Huber, M. Paschold, F. Schneble, F. Huettl, F. Watzka, H. Lang & W. Kneist

  2. Institute of Medical Biometrics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

    A. Poplawski

Authors
  1. T. Huber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Paschold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Schneble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Poplawski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Huettl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. Watzka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. H. Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. W. Kneist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Kneist.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

T. Huber, M. Paschold, F. Schneble, A. Poplawski, F. Huettl, F. Watzka, H. Lang, W. Kneist have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huber, T., Paschold, M., Schneble, F. et al. Structured assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation skills: the SALAS score. Surg Endosc 32, 4980–4984 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6260-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6260-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation