Abstract
Background
The clinical benefits of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) are proven, but overall financial benefits are not fully explored. Our goal was to evaluate the financial benefits of MIS from the payer’s perspective to demonstrate the value of minimally invasive colorectal surgery.
Methods
A Truven MarketScan® claim-based analysis identified all 2013 elective, inpatient colectomies. Cases were stratified into open or MIS approaches based on ICD-9 procedure codes; then costs were assessed using a similar distribution across diagnosis related groups (DRGs). Care episodes were compared for average allowed costs, complication, and readmission rates after adjusting costs for demographics, comorbidities, and geographic region.
Results
A total of 4615 colectomies were included—2054 (44.5 %) open and 2561 (55.5 %) MIS. Total allowed episode costs were significantly lower MIS than open ($37,540 vs. $45,284, p < 0.001). During the inpatient stay, open cases had significantly greater ICU utilization (3.9 % open vs. 2.0 % MIS, p < 0.001), higher overall complications (52.8 % open vs. 32.3 % MIS, p < 0.001), higher colorectal-specific complications (32.5 % open vs. 17.9 % MIS, p < 0.001), longer LOS (6.39 open vs. 4.44 days MIS, p < 0.001), and higher index admission costs ($39,585 open vs. $33,183 MIS, p < 0.001). Post-discharge, open cases had significantly higher readmission rates/100 cases (11.54 vs. 8.28; p = 0.0013), higher average readmission costs ($3055 vs. $2,514; p = 0.1858), and greater 30-day healthcare costs than MIS ($5699 vs. $4357; p = 0.0033). The net episode cost of care was $7744/patient greater for an open colectomy, even with similar DRG distribution.
Conclusions
In a commercially insured population, the risk-adjusted allowed costs for MIS colectomy episodes were significantly lower than open. The overall cost difference between MIS and open was almost $8000 per patient. This highlights an opportunity for health plans and employers to realize financial benefits by shifting from open to MIS for colectomy. With increasing bundled payment arrangements and accountable care sharing programs, the cost impact of shifting from open to MIS introduces an opportunity for cost savings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150
Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238:67–72
Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247:819–824
Senagore AJ, Stulberg JJ, Byrnes J, Delaney CP (2009) A national comparison of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data. Dis Colon Rectum 52:183–186
Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W, Vignali A, Pecorelli N, Di Carlo V (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection. Br J Surg 97:1180–1186
Senagore AJ (2015) Adoption of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: it was quite a journey. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 28:131–134
Dowson HM, Huang A, Soon Y, Gage H, Lovell DP, Rockall TA (2007) Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:908–919
Murray A, Lourenco T, de Verteuil R et al (2006) Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 10:1–141, iii–iv
Noblett SE, Horgan AF (2007) A prospective case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcomes of open versus laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 21:404–408
Berto P, Lopatriello S, Aiello A et al (2012) Cost of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 26:1444–1453
Kang CY, Chaudhry OO, Halabi WJ et al (2012) Outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009. Am J Surg 204:952–957
Jordan J, Dowson H, Gage H, Jackson D, Rockall T (2014) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection for cancer and polyps: a cost-effectiveness study. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 6:415–422
Asgeirsson T, Jrebi N, Feo L, Kerwel T, Luchtefeld M, Senagore AJ (2014) Incremental cost of complications in colectomy: a warranty guided approach to surgical quality improvement. Am J Surg 207:422–426 (discussion 425–6)
Keller DS, Pedraza R, Flores-Gonzalez JR, LeFave JP, Mahmood A, Haas EM (2015) The current status of emergent laparoscopic colectomy: a population-based study of clinical and financial outcomes. Surg Endosc 30:3321–3326
Aly OE, Quayyum Z (2012) Has laparoscopic colorectal surgery become more cost-effective over time? Int J Colorectal Dis 27:855–860
Dowson HM, Ballard K, Gage H, Jackson D, Williams P, Rockall TA (2013) Quality of life in the first 6 weeks following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. Value Health 16:367–372
Crawshaw BP, Chien HL, Augestad KM, Delaney CP (2015) Effect of laparoscopic surgery on health care utilization and costs in patients who undergo colectomy. JAMA Surg 150:410–415
CMS.gov. National Health Expenditure Data, Updated 12/3/2015. https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statistics-trends-and-reports/nationalhealthexpenddata/nationalhealthaccountshistorical.html. Last accessed 20 Feb 2016
Kocher KE, Nallamothu BK, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2013) Emergency department visits after surgery are common for Medicare patients, suggesting opportunities to improve care. Health Aff (Millwood) 32:1600–1607
Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Baser O, Dimick JB, Sutherland JM, Skinner JS (2010) Medicare payments for common inpatient procedures: implications for episode-based payment bundling. Health Serv Res 45:1783–1795
Keller DS, Chien HL, Hashemi L, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2014) The HARM score: a novel, easy measure to evaluate quality and outcomes in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 259:1119–1125
Krell RW, Girotti ME, Fritze D, Campbell DA, Hendren S (2013) Hospital readmissions after colectomy: a population-based study. J Am Coll Surg 217:1070–1079
Miller DC, Gust C, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer N, Skinner J, Birkmeyer JD (2011) Large variations in Medicare payments for surgery highlight savings potential from bundled payment programs. Health Aff (Millwood). 30:2107–2115
CMS.gov. The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) & Alternative Payment Models (APMs): Delivery System Reform, Medicare Payment Reform, & the MACRA. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs.html. Last accessed 20 Feb 2016
Surgeons. ACo. Frequently Asked Questions about MIPS. https://www.facs.org/advocacy/federal/medicare/faq. Last accessed 20 Feb 2016
Fry DE, Pine M, Jones BL, Meimban RJ (2011) The impact of ineffective and inefficient care on the excess costs of elective surgical procedures. J Am Coll Surg 212:779–786
Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Pigazzi A, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ (2015) Variations in laparoscopic colectomy utilization in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 58:950–956
CMS.gov. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/Evaluation of the CMS-HCC Risk Adjustment Model. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/Downloads/Evaluation_Risk_Adj_Model_2011.pdf. Last Accessed 21 Feb 2016
Senagore AJ, Brannigan A, Kiran RP, Brady K, Delaney CP (2005) Diagnosis-related group assignment in laparoscopic and open colectomy: financial implications for payer and provider. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1016–1020
Dimick JB, Weeks WB, Karia RJ, Das S, Campbell DAJ (2006) Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement. J Am Coll Surg 202:933–937
Schilling PL, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer JD (2008) Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 207:698–704
Lawson EH, Hall BL, Louie R, Zingmond DS, Ko CY (2014) Identification of modifiable factors for reducing readmission after colectomy: a national analysis. Surgery 155:754–766
Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ, Skinner JS (2012) Hospital quality and the cost of inpatient surgery in the United States. Ann Surg 255:1–5
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Physician quality reporting system. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/PQRS/index.html?redirect=/PQRS/. Last Accessed Dec 2014
Cromwell J, Dayhoff DA, Thoumaian AH (1997) Cost savings and physician responses to global bundled payments for Medicare heart bypass surgery. Health Care Financ Rev 19:41–57
Tsai TC, Joynt KE, Wild RC, Orav EJ, Jha AK (2015) Medicare’s Bundled Payment initiative: most hospitals are focused on a few high-volume conditions. Health Aff (Millwood) 34:371–380
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Medtronic Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies group for supporting the data source and actuarial analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Dr. Senagore is a Advisory board member for Ethicon Endosurgery. Ms. Fitch is a Actuary consultant, analysis supported by Medtronic, Inc. Mr. Bochner is an Actuary consultant, analysis supported by Medtronic, Inc. Dr. Haas provided Consulting support to institution from Medtronic, Inc. Dr. Keller has no conflict of interest.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keller, D.S., Senagore, A.J., Fitch, K. et al. A new perspective on the value of minimally invasive colorectal surgery—payer, provider, and patient benefits. Surg Endosc 31, 2846–2853 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5295-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5295-x