Skip to main content
Log in

The technical outcomes of delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a single-center safety and feasibility study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The indications for laparoscopic gastrectomy for early stomach cancer have spread worldwide, and the short-term outcomes have been favorable. Intraabdominal delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy using endoscopic linear staplers, a technique which was developed by Kanaya et al. is one of the feasible reconstructive procedures. Pure laparoscopic surgery is reported to be associated with several intraoperative and postoperative advantages in comparison with laparoscopy-assisted surgery. However, the clinical results remain uncertain. The present study aimed to evaluate both the technical feasibility and safety of delta-shaped anastomosis with LDG according to the short-term outcomes.

Methods

The study group was composed of 229 patients who underwent delta-shaped anastomosis with LDG at Gifu University School of Medicine from December 2004 to December 2014.

Results

The median total operative blood loss and operative time were 20 ml and 277 min, respectively. Postoperative complications were detected in 20 (8.7 %) patients. The complications included: anastomotic stenosis, n = 3 (1.3 %); anastomotic leakage, n = 3 (1.3 %); pancreatic injury, n = 8 (3.5 %); anastomotic ulcer, n = 1 (0.4 %); bowel obstruction, n = 1 (0.4 %); abdominal abscess, n = 1 (0.4 %); lymphorrhea, n = 1 (0.4 %); cardiac failure, n = 1 (0.4 %); and infection, n = 1 (0.4 %). The complications were classified as grade 2, n = 4 (1.7 %); grade 3a, n = 12 (5.2 %); grade 3b, n = 4 (1.7 %); and grade 4 and 5, n = 0 (0 %).

Conclusion

The findings of the present study indicate the safety of Kanaya’s procedure and that it should provide better outcomes in patients who undergo intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A et al (2000) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 135:806–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitano S, Shiraishi N (2004) Current status of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in Japan. Surg Endosc 18:182–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Tanigawa N (2007) Japanese Laparoscopic Surgical Study Group A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg 245:68–72

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Noshiro H, Nagai E, Shimizu S et al (2005) Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy with standard radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 19:1592–1596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shimizu S, Noshiro H, Nagai E, Uchiyama A, Tanaka M et al (2003) Laparoscopic gastric surgery in a Japanese institution: analysis of the initial 100 procedures. J Am Coll Surg 197:372–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee SW, Nomura E, Bouras G et al (2010) Long-term oncologic outcomes from laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single center experience of 601 consecutive resection. J Am Coll Surg 211:33–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsuhashi N, Osada S, Yamaguchi K et al (2013) Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy: a single-center safety and feasibility study. Surg Endosc 27(6):1973–1979

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Song KY, Park CH, Kang HC et al (2008) Is totally laparoscopic gastrectomy less invasive than laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy? Prospective, multicenter study. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1015–1021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim MG, Kawada H, Kim BS et al (2010) A totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with gastroduodenostomy (TLDG) for improvement of the early surgical outcomes in high BMI patients. Surg Endosc 25:1076–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanaya S, Gomi T, Momoi H et al (2002) Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy: new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy. J Am Coll Surg 195:284–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA et al (2004) Classification of surgical complication: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kitano S, Isono Y, Moriyama M et al (1994) Laparoscopyassisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Noh SH, Hyung WJ, Cheong JH (2005) Minimally invasive treatment for gastric cancer: approaches and selection process. J Surg Oncol 90(3):188–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Etoh T, Shiraishi N, Kitano S (2009) Current trends of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Japan. Asian J Endosc Surg 2(1):18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Etoh T, Inomata M, Shiraishi N et al (2012) Minimally invasive approaches for gastric cancer-Japanese experiences. J Surg Oncol 107(3):282–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bouras G, Lee SW, Nomura E et al (2011) Surgical outcomes from laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction: evolution in a totally intracorporeal technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21(1):37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takaori K, Nomura E, Mabuchi H et al (2005) A secure technique of intracorporeal Roux-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Am J Surg 189(2):178–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Miyasaka Y et al (2011) An additional suture secures against pitfalls in delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 14:385–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T et al (2000) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg 135(9):1029–1033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang HP, Lin LL, Jiang X et al (2016) Meta-analysis of hand-sewn versus mechanical gastrojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Int J Surg 32:150–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujiwara M, Kodera Y, Miura S et al (2005) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymph node dissection: a phase II study following the learning curve. J Surg Oncol 91(1):26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee SW, Tanigawa N, Nomura E et al (2012) Benefits of intracorporeal gastrointestinal anastomosis following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. World J Surg Oncol 10:267

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeong O, Park YK, Ryu SY et al (2010) Effect of age on surgical outcomes of extended gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma: prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1589–1596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, Nonaka K et al (2013) Laroscopic technique and safety experience with barbed suture closure for pelvic cavity after abdominoperineal resection. World J Surg Oncol 27(11):115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, Ichikawa K et al (2015) A single case of single-port access laparoscopic appendectomy during the puerperium. Int Surg 100(1):101–104

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Matsuhashi N, Osada S, Yamaguchi K et al (2013) Long-term outcomes of treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor by laparoscopic surgery. Hepatogastroenterology 60(128):2011–2015

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuhiro Yoshida.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

K. Yoshida has received honoraria for lecture from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly and Company, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Merck Serono Co., Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., Sanofi K.K., and research funding from Ajinomoto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. All remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsuhashi, N., Yamaguchi, K., Okumura, N. et al. The technical outcomes of delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a single-center safety and feasibility study. Surg Endosc 31, 1257–1263 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5103-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5103-7

Keywords

Navigation