Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical benefits and oncologic equivalence of self-expandable metallic stent insertion for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The efficacy of stenting for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical benefits of self-expandable metallic stent insertion for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction.

Methods

Clinical data from patients who underwent right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer from January 2006 to July 2014 at three Korea University hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 39 patients who developed malignant obstruction in the right-sided colon were identified, and their data were analyzed.

Results

Stent insertion was attempted in 16 patients, and initial technical success was achieved in 14 patients (87.5 %). No stent-related immediate complications were reported. Complete relief from obstruction was achieved in all 14 patients. Twenty-five patients, including two patients who failed stenting, underwent emergency surgery. In the stent group, 93 % (13/14) of patients underwent elective laparoscopic surgery, and only one surgery was converted to an open procedure. All patients in the emergency group underwent emergency surgery within 24 h of admission. In the emergency group, only 12 % (3/25) of patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, with one surgery converted to an open procedure. All patients in both groups underwent either laparoscopy-assisted or open right/extended right hemicolectomy with primary anastomoses as the first operation. The operative times, retrieved lymph nodes, and pathologic stage did not differ between the two groups. Postoperative hospital stay (9.4 ± 3.4 days in the stent group vs. 12.4 ± 5.9 in the emergency group, p = 0.089) and time to resume oral food intake (3.2 ± 2.1 days in the stent group vs. 5.7 ± 3.4 in the emergency group, p = 0.019) were shorter in the stent group. And there were no significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival between the two groups.

Conclusions

Stent insertion appears to be safe and feasible in patients with right-sided colonic malignant obstruction. It facilitates minimally invasive surgery and may result in better short-term surgical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tekkis PP, Kinsman R, Thompson MR, Stamatakis JD, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain, Ireland (2004) The association of coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland study of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:76–81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Irvin TT, Greaney MG (1977) The treatment of colonic cancer presenting with intestinal obstruction. Br J Surg 64:741–744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leitman IM, Sullivan JD, Brams D, DeCosse JJ (1992) Multivariate analysis of morbidity and mortality from the initial surgical management of obstructing carcinoma of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174:513–518

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deans GT, Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST (1994) Malignant obstruction of the left colon. Br J Surg 81:1270–1276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Repici A, Adler DG, Gibbs CM, Malesci A, Preatoni P, Baron TH (2007) Stenting of the proximal colon in patients with malignant large bowel obstruction: techniques and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 66:940–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dionigi G, Villa F, Rovera F, Boni L, Carrafiello G, Annoni M, Castano P, Bianchi V, Mangini M, Recaldini C, Laganà D, Bacuzzi A, Dionigi R (2007) Colonic stenting for malignant disease: review of literature. Surg Oncol 16(Suppl 1):S153–S155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Hooft JE, Bemelman WA, Oldenburg B, Marinelli AW, Lutke Holzik MF, Grubben MJ, Sprangers MA, Dijkgraaf MG, Fockens P, collaborative Dutch Stent-In study group (2011) Colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 12:344–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pirlet IA, Slim K, Kwiatkowski F, Michot F, Millat BL (2011) Emergency preoperative stenting versus surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25:1814–1821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho KS, Quah HM, Lim JF, Tang CL, Eu KW (2012) Endoscopic stenting and elective surgery versus emergency surgery for left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a prospective randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:355–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Conrad JK, Ferry KM, Foreman ML, Gogel BM, Fisher TL, Livingston SA (2000) Changing management trends in penetrating colon trauma. Dis Colon Rectum 43:466–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Finlayson A, Hulme-Moir M (2014) Palliative colonic stenting: a safe alternative to surgery in stage IV colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg. doi:10.1111/ans.12821

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ptok H, Meyer F, Marusch F, Steinert R, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Meyer L (2006) Palliative stent implantation in the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction. Surg Endosc 20:909–914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee HJ, Park SJ, Min BS, Cheon JH, Kim TI, Kim NK, Kim WH, Hong SP (2014) The role of primary colectomy after successful endoscopic stenting in patients with obstructive metastatic colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 57:694–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dastur JK, Forshaw MJ, Modarai B, Solkar MM, Raymond T, Parker MC (2008) Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes following either insertion of self-expanding metallic stents or emergency surgery in malignant large bowel obstruction. Tech Coloproctol 12:51–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson R, Marsh R, Corson J, Seymour K (2004) A comparison of two methods of palliation of large bowel obstruction due to irremovable colon cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86:99–103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Adler DG, Young-Fadok TM, Smyrk T, Garces YI, Baron TH (2002) Preoperative chemoradiation therapy after placement of a self-expanding metal stent in a patient with an obstructing rectal cancer: clinical and pathologic findings. Gastrointest Endosc 55:435–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Listorti C, Boselli C, Parisi A, Noya G, Sagar J (2013) Safety and efficacy of endoscopic colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery in the management of intestinal obstruction due to left colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22:14–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abe I, Kawamura YJ, Konishi F (2013) Laparoscopic colectomy for obstructive colorectal carcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:518–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van den Berg MW, Sloothaak DA, Dijkgraaf MG, van der Zaag ES, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Bosker RJ, Fockens P, ter Borg F, van Hooft JE (2014) Bridge-to-surgery stent placement versus emergency surgery for acute malignant colonic obstruction. Br J Surg 101:867–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Small AJ, Coelho-Prabhu N, Baron TH (2010) Endoscopic placement of self-expandable metal stents for malignant colonic obstruction: long-term outcomes and complication factors. Gastrointest Endosc 71:560–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boyle DJ, Thorn C, Saini A, Elton C, Atkin GK, Mitchell IC, Lotzof K, Marcus A, Mathur P (2015) Predictive factors for successful colonic stenting in acute large-bowel obstruction: a 15-year cohort analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:358–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung Myun Kwak.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. WB Ji, JM Kwak, DW Kang, HD Kwak, NS Sung, KD Hong, JW Um, SY Jeoung, SH Kang, SI Lee, BW Min, J Kim, BR Keum, ES Kim, and SH Kim have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, W.B., Kwak, J.M., Kang, D.W. et al. Clinical benefits and oncologic equivalence of self-expandable metallic stent insertion for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction. Surg Endosc 31, 153–158 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4946-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4946-2

Keywords

Navigation